Index › GTM › Products › Lusha › Alternatives · November 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Lusha, as AI models named them

In the November 2026 Edition, 347 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where Lusha holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 347 answers that did not name Lusha, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Sales intelligence and contact data

Sales. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Lusha is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessLusha is #2 of 8 here at 4% of first choices, 63 labels.

Thirty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those thirty-three answers, five products in all:

Apollo.io12 of 33
Cognism1 of 33
Hunter1 of 33
Origami1 of 33
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketLusha is #5 of 13 here at 0% of first choices, 48 labels.

Fifty-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those fifty-nine answers, five products in all:

Apollo.io24 of 59
Cognism1 of 59
Hunter1 of 59
The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseLusha is #11 of 12 here at 0% of first choices, 24 labels.

Seventy-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-six answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Data enrichment

GTM data and infrastructure. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Lusha is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessLusha is #3 of 9 here at 4% of first choices, 61 labels.

Thirty-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those thirty-seven answers, six products in all:

Apollo.io18 of 37
Clay3 of 37
Hunter1 of 37
Snov.io1 of 37
UpLead1 of 37
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketLusha is #6 of 9 here at 0% of first choices, 39 labels.

Sixty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-three answers, eight products in all:

The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseLusha is #7 of 10 here at 2% of first choices, 26 labels.

Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Lusha; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

ZoomInfo38 of 79
Cognism7 of 79
Clay4 of 79
FullEnrich4 of 79
6sense2 of 79
Demandbase2 of 79
8 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Lusha neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Lusha only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Lusha's side.

The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Lusha was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.