ReachStream
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
No model named it for this buyer.
Apollo.io is first at 93%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
No model named it for this buyer.
Why models recommend it
“ReachStream - Best overall for mid-market ABM prospecting, with affordable pricing and strong prospecting capabilities.”Llama 4 Maverick · Direct question · first choice
“Audiense and ReachStream are the top choices”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“ReachStream and similar B2B data platforms are framed as best for high-accuracy data & targeted prospecting for mid-market sales teams”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
“ReachStream is positioned as "Best overall choice for mid-market teams focused on precision and deliverability."”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ReachStream, over the 12 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 4 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 2 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 2 | 1 | View → | |
| 2 | 1 | View → | |
| 2 | 0 | View → | |
| 2 | 0 | View → | |
| 2 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named ReachStream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Twenty-eight of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming ReachStream came from a third party's page. Four were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |