Index › GTM › Products › Jasper › Alternatives · November 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Jasper, as AI models named them

In the November 2026 Edition, 388 of the 490 answers collected in the two categories where Jasper holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 388 answers that did not name Jasper, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Gane, the publisher, sells software in AI marketing agents and Content marketing, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.

AI marketing agents

Marketing. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Jasper is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessJasper is #5 of 8 here at 6% of first choices, 40 labels.

Fifty-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in seven. The first choices in those fifty-six answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketJasper is #2 of 5 here at 6% of first choices, 42 labels.

Fifty-five of the eighty-four answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those fifty-five answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseJasper is #2 of 7 here at 19% of first choices, 37 labels.

Forty-five of the seventy answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in eight. The first choices in those forty-five answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Content marketing platforms

Marketing. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Jasper is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessJasper is #10 of 16 here at 0% of first choices, 22 labels.

Seventy-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-one answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

10 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketJasper is #12 of 16 here at 0% of first choices, 14 labels.

Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseJasper holds 5 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Jasper; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-four products in all, the eight most named:

16 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Jasper neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Jasper only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Jasper's side.

The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Jasper was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.