Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Email verification › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
Email verification for enterprise buyers
Asked as “email verification service”, and as “email list validation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
ZeroBounceClear leader
51ZeroBounce06Hunter Email Verifier06NeverBounce36others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ZeroBounce vs KickboxZeroBounce vs EmailListVerifyZeroBounce vs DeBounceZeroBounce vs NeverBounceBouncer vs Hunter Email VerifierBouncer vs ClearoutBouncer vs KickboxBouncer vs EmailListVerifyBouncer vs DeBounceBouncer vs NeverBounceHunter Email Verifier vs ClearoutHunter Email Verifier vs KickboxHunter Email Verifier vs EmailListVerifyHunter Email Verifier vs DeBounceHunter Email Verifier vs NeverBounceClearout vs KickboxClearout vs EmailListVerifyClearout vs DeBounceClearout vs NeverBounceKickbox vs EmailListVerifyKickbox vs DeBounceKickbox vs NeverBounceEmailListVerify vs DeBounceEmailListVerify vs NeverBounceDeBounce vs NeverBounce
One product takes 51% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Verifications.io
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid: Services with Severe Historical Red Flags ... Why avoid: In 2019, this service suffered one of the largest data breaches in history” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
MillionVerifier75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“describe the company as a "shell company" with no real customer support ... this level of unreliability and non-responsiveness is unacceptable” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
DeBounce50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Popular budget services (such as *DeBounce*) are widely used for small projects but lack these critical certifications.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Hunter Email Verifier24%
5 of 21 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“its per-email cost is significantly higher than dedicated verifiers ... too expensive for pure verification” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Four of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited.
Sites the answers cite
23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 333 links across 144 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
vendor site · ZeroBounce17 answers · 30 citations · 3 models
13 answers · 26 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Hunter10 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Overloop7 answers · 7 citations · 2 models
vendor site · ZoomInfo6 answers · 10 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Kickbox6 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Mailtrap6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · La Growth Machine5 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Clearout5 answers · 5 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Truelist4 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Prospeo4 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Cleanlist4 answers · 4 citations · 1 model
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
9 answers · 3 models
8 answers · 2 models
7 answers · 2 models
6 answers · 3 models
5 answers · 2 models
5 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 1 model
4 answers · 3 models
4 answers · 2 models
4 answers · 2 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email verification service”, “email verification service”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroBounce zerobounce.net | 51% | 250 | 9,900 | 118 | 38,183 | $778 | 120 | 2 |
| NeverBounce neverbounce.com | 6% | 155 | 8,100 | 64 | 73,301 | 16 | ||
| Hunter Email Verifier hunter.io | 6% | 46 | 5,400 | 0 | 152,782 | 6 | 5 | |
| ZoomInfo zoominfo.com | 6% | 542 | 135,000 | 1,810 | 6,376,738 | $1,140 | 120 | |
| Kickbox kickbox.com | 4% | 140 | 74,000 | 15,514 | 39,936 | 31 | ||
| Bouncer usebouncer.com | 4% | 124 | 27,100 | 6,621 | 9,553 | 24 | 6 | |
| BulkEmailChecker bulkemailchecker.com | 4% | 8 | ||||||
| Unlimited Verifier unlimitedverifier.com | 4% | 2 | ||||||
| Truelist truelist.io | 2% | 3 | 7 | |||||
| BillionVerify billionverify.com | 2% | 5 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (hunter.io, mailtrap.io, truelist.io, usebouncer.com, zerobounce.net). The first result for “best email verification service” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best email verification service for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which email list validation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade email verification services and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email verification service for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an email verification service. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email verification services should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SkrappNeverBounce, ZeroBounceChangedno first choiceTruelist, Unlimited Verifierno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Allegrow, ZeroBounce, ZoomInfoOne alternative
MillionVerifierGPT-5.4 miniZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldZeroBounceZeroBounceno first choiceagainst: Kickbox, MailTester, Xverify
Two alternatives
Bouncer, EmailableOne alternative
Mailgun ValidateThree alternatives
Bouncer, BriteVerify, Hunter Email VerifierGemini 3.5 FlashZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldZeroBounceBulkEmailChecker, ZeroBounceKickboxagainst: DeBounce, Verifications.io
Three alternatives
Bouncer, BriteVerify, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
Bouncer, NeverBounceFive alternatives
Bouncer, BriteVerify, Emailable, Kickbox, NeverBounceThree alternatives
Bouncer, Plauti Verify, TruelistTwo alternatives
BriteVerify, ZeroBouncePerplexity SonarZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldZeroBounceZeroBounceagainst: Bouncerno first choiceagainst: DeBounce, EmailListVerify, Emailable, Enrichley, Findymail, Lead Magic, MailerCheck, NeverBounce
Three alternatives
Bouncer, NeverBounce, ZoomInfoTwo alternatives
Bouncer, ZoomInfoSix alternatives
Bouncer, Clearout, Emailable, Hunter Email Verifier, Kickbox, NeverBounceOne alternative
EmailListVerifyGrok 4.20ZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldagainst: Hunter Email VerifierZeroBounceagainst: BriteVerify, Hunter Email VerifierZeroBounceagainst: Bouncer, NeverBounceZeroBounceagainst: Clearout, DeBounce, Email List Validation, EmailListVerify, MillionVerifier, Verifications.io
Five alternatives
Bouncer, Clearout, Hunter Email Verifier, Kickbox, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
Kickbox, NeverBounceThree alternatives
Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounceThree alternatives
BulkEmailChecker, Kickbox, TruelistTwo alternatives
Bouncer, EmailableMistral SmallZoomInfoZoomInfoHeldBouncer, ZeroBounceBillionVerifyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Allegrow, Cognism, Kickbox, ZeroBounceTwo alternatives
NeverBounce, ZeroBounceFive alternatives
Clearout, Emailable, Hunter Email Verifier, MillionVerifier, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
Email List Validation, ZeroBounceDeepSeek V4 FlashHunter Email Verifier, ZeroBounceKickboxChangedNeverBounce, ZeroBounceagainst: Hunter Email Verifier, MillionVerifierBulkEmailChecker's Unlimited APIZeroBounceagainst: DeBounce, MillionVerifier, NeverBounceagainst: MillionVerifier, NeverBounce, Snov.io, Verifications.io
Three alternatives
Clearout, Kickbox, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
NeverBounce, ZeroBounceThree alternatives
Bouncer, Emailable, KickboxTwo alternatives
NeverBounce, ZeroBounceOne alternative
KickboxLlama 4 MaverickNeverBounceZeroBounceChangedno first choiceZeroBounceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ZeroBounce, ZoomInfoThree alternatives
Bouncer, Cleanlist, Hunter Email VerifierTwo alternatives
DeBounce, NeverBounceQwen 3.7 FlashZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldZeroBounceUnlimited Verifierno first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, Enrichley, Findymail, Hunter Email Verifier, Lead Magic, MailerCheck, Snov.io
Seven alternatives
BriteVerify, Emailable, Hunter Email Verifier, Kickbox, NeverBounce, Prospeo, PuzzlyThree alternatives
Kickbox, NeverBounce, VerifaliaFive alternatives
Bouncer, Clearout, Emailable, Kickbox, NeverBounceFour alternatives
BulkEmailChecker, Clearout, NeverBounce, ZeroBounceKimi K2ZeroBounceZeroBounceHeldZeroBounceagainst: BriteVerifyBulkEmailChecker, Hunter Email Verifieragainst: Apollo.iono first choiceagainst: Bounceragainst: EmailListVerify, HubSpot, Mailchimp, MillionVerifier, Verifications.io
Two alternatives
Kickbox, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
Bouncer, KickboxFive alternatives
Bouncer, Clearout, Emailable, Kickbox, NeverBounceTwo alternatives
Kickbox, NeverBounceFour alternatives
BriteVerify, Kickbox, NeverBounce, ZeroBounceGLM 4.7 FlashXZeroBounceagainst: Hunter Email VerifierBouncerChangedNeverBounceBounceragainst: MillionVerifierno first choiceagainst: Verifications.io
Three alternatives
Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounceFour alternatives
Emailable, Kickbox, NeverBounce, ZeroBounceSix alternatives
Bouncer, Clearout, Emailable, Hunter Email Verifier, Kickbox, ZeroBounceTwo alternatives
NeverBounce, ZeroBounceMiniMax M2.5NeverBounce, ZeroBounce, ZoomInfoCleanlist, Hunter Email VerifierChangedNeverBounceagainst: BriteVerifyBulkEmailChecker Unlimited APIno first choicenothing named
One alternative
BouncerTwo alternatives
Clearout, ZoomInfoFour alternatives
Clearout, Emailable, Kickbox, ZeroBounceThree alternatives
MailValid, NeverBounce, ZeroBounceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:19 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-14 23:20 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 01:32 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 03:40 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:47 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:47 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 02:29 | yes | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:34 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:16 | yes | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:28 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 23:33 | yes | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-14 23:38 | yes | 0 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-14 22:53 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 05:03 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:17 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:38 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 01:54 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:58 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 23:10 | yes | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 02:55 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:39 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-14 23:23 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 00:04 | yes | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:57 | yes | 0 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:30 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-14 23:56 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 04:14 | yes | 29 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 01:12 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:21 | yes | 0 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 01:47 | yes | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-15 00:47 | yes | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 00:15 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 04:33 | yes | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 01:16 | yes | 0 | 96 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 01:37 | yes | 0 | 66 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 01:36 | yes | 0 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 03:32 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:19 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-15 00:18 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 04:35 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 04:36 | yes | 0 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:23 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 04:48 | yes | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-14 23:37 | yes | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:58 | yes | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:23 | yes | 0 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 00:45 | yes | 0 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 00:40 | yes | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 01:09 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 00:14 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 23:59 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-15 00:32 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 03:27 | yes | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 03:40 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-14 22:59 | yes | 0 | 87 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 01:04 | yes | 0 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-14 23:46 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 03:20 | yes | 0 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-15 03:46 | yes | 0 | 88 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 02:22 | yes | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-15 02:05 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-15 04:08 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-14 22:52 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-14 23:40 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-15 00:37 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-15 00:29 | yes | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-15 00:09 | yes | 0 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-15 03:50 | yes | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-15 01:47 | yes | 0 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-15 04:52 | yes | 0 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-14 22:52 | yes | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-15 04:09 | yes | 0 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bulk Email Checker read as BulkEmailChecker
Hunter read as Hunter Email Verifier
Hunter (Email Verification) read as Hunter Email Verifier
Hunter (Email Verifier) read as Hunter Email Verifier
Hunter.io read as Hunter Email Verifier
Unresolved, counted raw
BulkEmailChecker Unlimited API
BulkEmailChecker's Unlimited API
DataCaptive
Emaillistchecker
MailValid
Plauti Verify
Puzzly
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.