ProcessMind is a process mining platform that lets users model, mine, and improve processes · processmind.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 21%.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform is first at 68%.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, ProcessMind offers the best balance of affordability, ease of use, and functionality.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Some tools offer free tiers or affordable entry points (e.g., ProcessMind at €29/seat, Mindzie free desktop edition)”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · alternative
“offers a free Individual plan with paid seats starting at $35 per month, which is very accessible”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“If Budget is a Concern: ProcessMind”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · alternative
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as ProcessMind, over the 23 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 6 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → | |
| 11 | 8 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 1 | View → | |
| 3 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on ProcessMind's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named ProcessMind and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-four of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming ProcessMind came from a third party's page. Seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 39 | 4 | 2026-08-25 | Process mining, EA tools | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | Process mining, RPA | |
| Comparison | 12 | 6 | 2026-09-17 | Process mining | |
| News or press | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | Process mining | |
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | Process mining |
Every page processmind.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.