September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Cloud and infrastructure › Container security › Small business · September 2026 Edition

Container and Kubernetes security for small business buyers

Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 64 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Kubescape 23%
28Trivy23Kubescape22Falco27others

28% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Trivy28%4%55accepted challenger
02Kubescape23%0%43accepted challenger
03Falco22%7%54accepted challenger
04Snyk Container14%2%47accepted challenger
05SUSE NeuVector3%16%19accepted challenger
06Microsoft Defender for Containers3%43%14criticized challenger
07Calico2%0%23accepted challenger
08Sysdig Secure2%41%49criticized challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Prisma Cloud0%72%32criticized challenger
11Aqua Security0%52%46criticized challenger
09Wiz0%31%26criticized challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Trivy28%
02Kubescape23%
03Falco22%
04Snyk Container14%
05SUSE NeuVector3%
06Microsoft Defender for Containers3%
07Calico2%
08Sysdig Secure2%
09Wiz0%
10Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%
11Aqua Security0%
12Prisma Cloud0%

What they warned about

Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Aqua Security
52%
24 of 46 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Premium pricing that can feel "heavyweight"... likely unnecessary—and potentially a wasteful investment” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Prisma Cloud
72%
23 of 32 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“While powerful, it is notoriously complex and expensive... for a small business, the sheer volume of alerts and console navigation can overwhelm a lean team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Sysdig Secure
41%
20 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Per-node/workload pricing can surprise small teams as clusters grow; not ideal unless you're already deep into K8s at scale” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for Containers
43%
6 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“platforms that small businesses should be cautious about or avoid include: 1. Microsoft Defender for Cloud - can be expensive for small to medium businesses.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 764 links across 150 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · CyberPress55 answers · 75 citations · 11 models
48 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
39 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Portainer22 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · OX21 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SentinelOne18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Aikido14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Trivy trivy.dev28%2485,4001823,093
Kubescape kubescape.io23%552601150
Falco falco.org22%11927,1004,242383
Snyk snyk.io
Snyk Container 14%
14%11112,10058161,651 company60
SUSE NeuVector suse.com3%1620059,6151039
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender for Containers 3%
3%4318,1003,525
Calico tigera.io2%35135,00020,80221,429$812
Aikido aikido.dev
Aikido Security 2%
2%3262,400516,442 company$936120
Kube-bench kubernetes.ae2%14
Sysdig Secure sysdig.com2%252110250,599$1,06749

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, ox.security, sentinelone.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Snyk Container
Six alternativesAqua Security, Calico, Falco, Kubescape, Portainer, Trivy
Falco, KubescapeChanged
One alternativeTrivy
Falco, Trivy
Three alternativesAqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
SUSE NeuVector
One alternativeTrivy
no first choiceagainst: Anchore, Aqua Security, Falco, Trivy
GPT-5.4 miniSysdig Secure
Two alternativesAmazon ECR scanning, Anchore
against: Aqua Security
TrivyChanged
Two alternativesKube-bench, Kyverno
Sysdig Secure
Three alternativesAqua Security, Falco, Lacework
against: Prisma Cloud
Snyk Container
Two alternativesSysdig Secure, Wiz
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashSnyk Container
Five alternativesAqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Orca Security, Trivy, Wiz
KubescapeChanged
Two alternativesDatadog Cloud Security Management, Trivy
against: Cilium/Tetragon, Falco, Sysdig Secure
Trivy
Four alternativesAikido Security, Docker Scout, Falco, Snyk Container
against: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Falco, Trivy
Four alternativesGrype, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container
against: CrowdStrike, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Aikido Security, Snyk Container
Five alternativesDocker Scout, Falco, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
against: Aqua Security, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Falco, Open Policy Agent, Prisma Cloud, Qualys, SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure, Tenable, Wiz
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for Containers, Snyk Container
Three alternativesAqua Security, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
KubescapeChanged
Two alternativesFalco, Sysdig Secure
Trivy
Four alternativesOrca Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
against: Aqua Security
Trivy
Four alternativesFalco, Kubescape, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Snyk Container
against: SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure
no first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Grok 4.20Trivy
Six alternativesCalico, Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
KubescapeChanged
Two alternativesFalco, Trivy
against: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
One alternativeSnyk Container
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Trivy
Two alternativesFalco, Kubescape
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Free Tier, Sysdig Secure
no first choice
Three alternativesAqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Prisma Cloud
against: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Defender for Containers
Five alternativesCalico, Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Trivy
Kube-bench, TrivyChanged
Two alternativesFalco, Starboard
Trivy
Six alternativesAikido Security, Falco, Kubescape, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
Falco, Trivy
Three alternativesKubescape, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Snyk Container
no first choiceagainst: Falco, SUSE NeuVector, Trivy
DeepSeek V4 FlashTrivy
Five alternativesFalco, Harbor, Kubescape, Snyk Container, TigerGate
against: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Falco, KubescapeChanged
Four alternativesAqua Security, Fairwinds, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
Trivy
Three alternativesFalco, Kubescape, Snyk Container
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
SUSE NeuVector, Trivy
Four alternativesCalico, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk Container
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
Five alternativesAqua Security, Harbor, Kyverno, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Wiz
against: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceFalco, KubescapeChanged
One alternativeAikido Security
no first choiceTrivy
Three alternativesCalico, Falco, Kubescape
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for Containers
Qwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Container
Five alternativesAWS Security Hub, Google Securing Assets, Kubescape, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Trivy
against: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure
KubescapeChanged
Three alternativesFalco, Snyk Container, Wiz
Snyk Container
Two alternativesTrivy, Wiz
against: Sysdig Secure
Snyk Container
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender for Containers, SUSE NeuVector
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
Snyk Container
One alternativeTrivy
against: Sysdig Secure
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys, Sysdig Secure, Tenable
Kimi K2Snyk Container, Trivy
Six alternativesAqua Security, Calico, Falco, Kubescape, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
KubescapeChanged
Three alternativesARMO Platform, Falco, Trivy
Snyk Container
Six alternativesAikido Security, Aqua Security, Docker Scout, Falco, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
Five alternativesCalico, Cilium, Harbor, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container
Falco, Trivy
Four alternativesAikido Security, Calico, Kubescape, Snyk Container
against: Aqua Security
against: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
GLM 4.7 FlashXCalico, Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
Three alternativesAqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
against: Prisma Cloud
Falco, KubescapeChanged
Four alternativesAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
Falco, Trivy
Six alternativesCalico, Cloudanix, Kubescape, OX Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk Container
against: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure
Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
Three alternativesCalico, Snyk Container, Syft/Grype
against: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable
MiniMax M2.5Falco, Kubescape, Trivy
Five alternativesAqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
Falco, KubescapeChangedTrivy
Four alternativesFalco, Kubescape, Snyk Container, Wiz
Falco, Trivy
Two alternativesSUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container
no first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:17yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:49yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:31yes823 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:05yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:29yes3415 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:22yes109 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:48yes1717 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:55yes54 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:23no039 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:50yes822 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:06yes1151 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:10yes642 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:09yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:41no04 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:49yes722 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:12yes196 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:28yes1814 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:17no04 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:00yes817 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:05yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 14:14yes557 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:32yes1328 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:28yes12208 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 14:04yes558 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:49yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:48yes410 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:10yes1926 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:45yes209 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:36yes3321 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:23yes711 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:29yes1518 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:44yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:20no044 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 14:01yes861 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:20yes1349 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:02yes1234 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:27yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:11yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:03yes823 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:43yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:03yes2315 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:50yes77 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:33yes1317 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:00yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:53yes533 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 14:09yes727 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:23yes1182 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:29yes1340 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:46no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:17no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:32yes625 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:56yes208 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:47yes1814 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:16no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:21yes1419 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:08yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:05no042 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:01yes1734 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:01yes1384 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:54yes515 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 14:05yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:48no05 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:38yes2323 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:43yes1912 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:58yes2315 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:25yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:40yes2531 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:46yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:16yes547 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:47yes1228 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:55yes1791 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:57yes1254 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Amazon ECR scanning read as Amazon ECR scanning
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Microsoft Defender for Cloud read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Snyk (Container) read as Snyk Container
Snyk (free tier) read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Sysdig (Commercial Enterprise Suite) read as Sysdig Secure
Unresolved, counted raw
Checoscan
Google Securing Assets (GCP)
Starboard (by Aqua Security)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ColocationEnterprise storage →