Cloud cost management for small business buyers
Asked as “cloud cost management platform”, and as “FinOps tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 64 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Vantage19AWS Cost Explorer09Microsoft Cost Management31others
41% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Cloud Cost Management is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models three times of 44. Google Cloud Billing is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models one time of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Vantage vs Microsoft Cost ManagementVantage vs nOpsVantage vs InfracostCloudZero vs AWS Cost ExplorerCloudZero vs FinoutCloudZero vs Microsoft Cost ManagementCloudZero vs nOpsCloudZero vs InfracostAWS Cost Explorer vs FinoutAWS Cost Explorer vs Microsoft Cost ManagementAWS Cost Explorer vs nOpsAWS Cost Explorer vs InfracostFinout vs Microsoft Cost ManagementFinout vs nOpsFinout vs InfracostMicrosoft Cost Management vs nOpsMicrosoft Cost Management vs InfracostnOps vs Infracost
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05K06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Vantage41%
Vantage41%02AWS Cost Explorer19%
AWS Cost Explorer19%03Microsoft Cost Management9%
Microsoft Cost Management9%04Google Cloud Cost Management5%
Google Cloud Cost Management5%05Infracost2%
Infracost2%06Kubecost2%
07Google Cloud Billing2%
Google Cloud Billing2%08SpendArk2%
SpendArk2%09CloudZero2%
CloudZero2%10Finout2%
Finout2%11VMware Tanzu CloudHealth2%
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth2%12OpenCost0%
OpenCost0%13CAST AI0%
CAST AI0%14ProsperOps0%
ProsperOps0%15nOps0%
nOps0%16Flexera One0%
Flexera One0%17IBM Apptio Cloudability0%
IBM Apptio Cloudability0%What they warned about
Five of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
IBM Apptio Cloudability85%
23 of 27 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 13 hard negative
“Enterprise-grade tools (like IBM Cloudability or Broadcom’s CloudHealth) are generally overkill and too expensive for smaller scales.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
VMware Tanzu CloudHealth91%
21 of 23 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 12 hard negative
“Why to Avoid: They typically require custom sales negotiations, professional services setups, and can cost significantly more per month than your actual cloud bill.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Flexera One79%
11 of 14 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“prohibitive upfront costs for SMBs, implementation complexity, and UI navigation issues. Better for large multi-cloud enterprises.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
CloudZero22%
8 of 36 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Enterprise-focused platforms (e.g., Cloudaware, CloudZero, some offerings from Flexera) are often too expensive or complex for small businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 916 links across 163 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Cloudaware53 answers · 64 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CloudZero49 answers · 69 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SpendArk38 answers · 72 citations · 9 models
vendor site · nOps28 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Usage.ai25 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Amnic22 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Vantage20 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · PointFive17 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
14 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 11 models
36 answers · 10 models
32 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud cost management platform”, “cloud cost management platform”, “cloud cost management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantage vantage.sh | 41% | 190 | 49,500 | 10,715 | 37,252 | 4 | ||
| AWS parent site AWS Cost Explorer 19% | 19% | 131 | 368,000 | 114,001 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Cost Management 9% | 9% | 97 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Google Cloud cloud.google.com Google Cloud Cost Management 5%, Google Cloud Billing 2% | 6% | 43 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 7,405,347 | |||
| Azure parent site Azure Advisor 3%, Azure Cost Management + Advisor 2% | 5% | 9 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| GCP Recommender | 3% | 135,000 | 5,203 | |||||
| Infracost infracost.io | 2% | 32 | 590 | 21 | 4,599 | |||
| Kubecost | 2% | 1,000 | 25 | |||||
| SpendArk spendark.com | 2% | 14 | 10 | 0 | 269 | |||
| CloudZero cloudzero.com | 2% | 168 | 2,400 | 32 | 99,194 | $25,945 | 5 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudaware.com, cloudzero.com, gartner.com, nops.io, reddit.com, usage.ai). The first result for “best cloud cost management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cloud cost management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which FinOps tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top cloud cost management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud cost management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a cloud cost management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud cost management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AWS Cost Explorer, Microsoft Cost ManagementVantageChangedAWS Cost ExplorerAWS Cost Explorerno first choiceagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost
Five alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Economize, ProsperOps, VantageTwo alternatives
CloudZero, nOpsSix alternatives
CAST AI, CLOUD TOGGLE, CloudZero, Finout, ProsperOps, SedaiTwo alternatives
Finout, VantageGPT-5.4 miniVantageAWS Cost Explorer, Cost ExplorerChangedVantageAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: CloudKeeper, nOpsno first choiceagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Kubecost, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Three alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, CloudKeeperTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost ManagementFour alternatives
CloudZero, Finout, Kubecost, Spot by NetAppOne alternative
VantageGemini 3.5 FlashVantageagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageHeldVantageagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware AriaVantageagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageagainst: IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, ProsperOps, Usage.ai, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Five alternatives
CAST AI, CloudZero, Infracost, Kubecost, ProsperOpsFour alternatives
Anchor, Chargebee, CloudZero, PaddleFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Infracost, KubecostFive alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, C3X, CAST AI, Infracost, KubecostEight alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, Harness Cloud Cost Management, Infracost, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, ProsperOps, ZestyPerplexity SonarVantageCloudZeroChangedAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost Management, Vantageagainst: Harness Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageno first choiceagainst: Cloudaware, Dynatrace, Finout, Flexera One, Harness Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, ProsperOps, ServiceNow, Usage.ai, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, Vantage
Five alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Kubecost / OpenCost, Microsoft Cost Management, ProsperOpsFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Finout, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost ManagementFour alternatives
CloudZero, Infracost, Kubecost, OpenCostTwo alternatives
ManageEngine CloudSpend, native cloud billing toolsGrok 4.20VantageVantageHeldagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, KubecostVantageagainst: CloudZero, Finout, Flexera One, IBM Apptio CloudabilityAWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management + Advisor, Google Cloud Billing + RecommenderSpendArk, Vantageagainst: Cloudaware, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, ServiceNow Cloud Cost Management, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Two alternatives
Cloudchipr, Native Cloud ToolsFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudQuell, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost ManagementFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Infracost, Kubecost, SpendArkTwo alternatives
Pump, VantageSix alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudZero, Harness Cloud Cost Management, Infracost, Kubecost, OpenCostMistral SmallVantageKubecost, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthChangedAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost Management, SpendArk, Vantageagainst: IBM Apptio CloudabilityAWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, GCP Recommenderno first choiceagainst: CloudZero, Cloudaware, Flexera One
Two alternatives
CloudKeeper, CloudZeroTwo alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Microsoft Cost ManagementThree alternatives
CloudZero, Infracost, KubecostTwo alternatives
Infracost, VantageDeepSeek V4 FlashVantageagainst: CAST AI, IBM Apptio Cloudability, Spot by NetApp, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageHeldagainst: Flexera One, IBM Apptio CloudabilityVantageagainst: CloudZero, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: CloudZero, Flexera One, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthAWS Cost Explorer, Vantageagainst: CAST AI, CloudZero, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Six alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, Google Cloud Cost Management, Infracost, Kubecost / OpenCost, Microsoft Cost ManagementFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudZero, Google Cloud Billing, Microsoft Cost ManagementSeven alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Infracost, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, OpenCost, nOpsFour alternatives
AWS Compute Optimizer, CAST AI, Infracost, VantageEight alternatives
CloudZero, GCP native tools, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, OpenCost, ProsperOps, Usage.ai, nOpsLlama 4 MaverickVantageFinoutChangedSpendArkVantageno first choiceagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Cloudaware
Two alternatives
Flexera One, SpendArkFour alternatives
CloudZero, Cloudaware, FinOpsly, VantageTwo alternatives
CloudZero, VantageThree alternatives
CloudZero, Infracost, OpenCostQwen 3.7 FlashBetter Stackagainst: IBM Apptio CloudabilityVantageChangedSpendArkagainst: CloudZero, IBM Apptio CloudabilityAWS Cost Explorer, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: Finout, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthHologree, Vantageagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, Azure Dashboard, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthagainst: AWS Cost Explorer, AWS X-Ray, Anodot, Azure Advisor, Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Densify, Dynatrace, Google Cloud Billing, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Three alternatives
Datadog Cloud Cost Management, Finout, KubecostOne alternative
CloudZeroTwo alternatives
Kubecost, VantageFour alternatives
Google Cloud Billing, Infracost, Kubecost, VantageThree alternatives
CAST AI, Kubecost, OpenCostKimi K2Vantageagainst: CloudZeroVantageHeldVantageAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: VMware Tanzu CloudHealthVantageagainst: CAST AI, DoiT Cloud Intelligence, Flexera One, IBM Apptio Cloudability, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
One alternative
ProsperOpsTwo alternatives
CloudZero, CloudchiprSix alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudToggle, Infracost, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, SpendArkFour alternatives
Infracost, OpenCost, SpendArk, VantageTwo alternatives
CloudZero, KubecostGLM 4.7 FlashXVantageagainst: CloudZero, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthManageEngine CloudSpendChangedSpendArk, Vantageagainst: CAST AI, Cloudaware, ProsperOps, Usage.ai, nOpsAWS Cost Explorer, Google Cloud Cost Management, Microsoft Cost Managementagainst: Spot by NetApp, VMware Tanzu CloudHealthno first choicenothing named
One alternative
EconomizeOne alternative
CloudZeroThree alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, Infracost, KubecostFive alternatives
Cloudchipr, Infracost, ManageEngine CloudSpend, SpendArk, VantageMiniMax M2.5VantageVantageHeldagainst: FinoutVantageAWS Cost Explorer, Azure Advisor, GCP Recommender, InfracostVantageagainst: VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Three alternatives
CloudZero, Infracost, SpendArkOne alternative
CloudZeroSeven alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CAST AI, Google Cloud Billing, Infracost, Kubecost, Microsoft Cost Management, SpendArkOne alternative
VantageFour alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer, CloudZero, DoiT Cloud Intelligence, Microsoft Cost ManagementBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:53 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:30 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:58 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:30 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 40 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:50 | yes | 7 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:15 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:00 | yes | 29 | 83 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:58 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:57 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:00 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 31 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:47 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:25 | yes | 21 | 96 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:36 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:08 | yes | 34 | 91 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:42 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:05 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:01 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:13 | yes | 42 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:42 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:05 | yes | 28 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:13 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:51 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 14:15 | yes | 16 | 139 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:05 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:06 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:25 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:32 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:30 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 37 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 8 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:20 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:57 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 13 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:04 | yes | 14 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:50 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:31 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:18 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:37 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:14 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:43 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:53 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:37 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:06 | yes | 41 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 26 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:06 | yes | 8 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:09 | yes | 19 | 71 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:27 | yes | 12 | 80 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer & Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer + AWS Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer/Budgets read as AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Management read as AWS Cost Explorer
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Cost Management
Datadog (Cloud Cost Management Add-on) read as Datadog Cloud Cost Management
DoiT read as DoiT Cloud Intelligence
Flexera read as Flexera One
Flexera (including Cloud Cost Optimization and former Spot/CloudCheckr) read as Flexera One
Google Cloud Billing / Cost Management read as Google Cloud Cost Management
Harness read as Harness Cloud Cost Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Anchor
Azure Dashboard
C3X
CLOUD TOGGLE
CloudToggle
GCP native tools
Hologree
OpenOps
Paddle
VMware Aria (formerly CloudHealth)
native cloud billing tools
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.