Container and Kubernetes security
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Aqua Security 18%
29Sysdig Secure18Aqua Security16Trivy37others
29% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sysdig Secure vs KubescapeSysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs SUSE NeuVectorAqua Security vs TrivyAqua Security vs FalcoAqua Security vs KubescapeAqua Security vs WizAqua Security vs Snyk ContainerAqua Security vs SUSE NeuVectorTrivy vs FalcoTrivy vs KubescapeTrivy vs WizTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs SUSE NeuVectorFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs WizFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs SUSE NeuVectorKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs SUSE NeuVectorWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs SUSE NeuVectorSnyk Container vs SUSE NeuVector
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Sysdig Secure29%
Sysdig Secure29%02Aqua Security18%
Aqua Security18%03Trivy16%
Trivy16%04Falco10%
Falco10%05Kubescape10%
Kubescape10%06Wiz4%
Wiz4%07Snyk Container2%
Snyk Container2%08SUSE NeuVector2%
SUSE NeuVector2%09Orca Security2%
Orca Security2%10Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%11Microsoft Defender for Containers0%
Microsoft Defender for Containers0%12Prisma Cloud0%
Prisma Cloud0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Prisma Cloud36%
16 of 44 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid Prisma Cloud if you are a small team or lack dedicated DevOps/SRE resources to configure a complex policy engine.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Wiz29%
11 of 38 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid big CNAPPs like Palo Alto Prisma or Wiz unless you need broader cloud workload coverage.” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Aqua Security15%
8 of 52 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“Aqua has deep container expertise but: Requires integration with separate platforms... Pricing scales significantly by node count” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Sysdig Secure12%
7 of 58 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“Be Cautious with Sysdig if you are deploying on bare metal or have high-performance computing requirements that cannot tolerate agent overhead.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 824 links across 183 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
50 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberPress42 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Checkmarx21 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OX21 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Minimus17 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SentinelOne16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Portainer16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Safeguard14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 29% | 252 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Aqua aquasec.com Aqua Security 18% | 18% | 214 | 880 | 32 | 7,831 company | 0 | 2 | |
| Trivy trivy.dev | 16% | 248 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Falco falco.org | 10% | 119 | 27,100 | 4,242 | 383 | |||
| Kubescape kubescape.io | 10% | 55 | 260 | 1 | 150 | |||
| Wiz wiz.io | 4% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 2% | 2% | 111 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| SUSE NeuVector suse.com | 2% | 16 | 20 | 0 | 59,615 | 103 | 9 | |
| ARMO Platform | 2% | |||||||
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, ox.security, sentinelone.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceKubescapeChangedno first choiceFalcono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Calico, Falco, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig SecureGPT-5.4 miniSysdig SecureKubescapeChangedno first choiceARMO Platform, Chainguard, Falcoagainst: Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, Wizno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Prisma AIRS, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Kyverno, TrivyThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
TrivyGemini 3.5 FlashAikido Securityagainst: WizSysdig SecureChangedagainst: Gatekeeper, Open Policy Agent, Orca Security, WizWizagainst: Snyk ContainerSUSE NeuVectoragainst: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizOrca Security, Wizagainst: Anchore Engine, Carbon Black, Clair, Docker Bench for Security, Elastic’s "Defend for Containers", Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector
Two alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
ARMO Platform, Falco, Kubescape, Kyverno, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
ARMO Platform, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk Container, TrivyFive alternatives
ARMO Platform, Aqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecurePerplexity SonarWizSysdig SecureChangedAqua Security, Sysdig SecureTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wizno first choiceagainst: Clair, Falco, Grype, Tetragon, Trivy
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, KubescapeFive alternatives
OX Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, WizFour alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, TigerGateGrok 4.20Aqua Securityagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizFalco, KubescapeChangedAqua Securityagainst: Falco, Kubescape, TrivyTrivyagainst: Snyk ContainerAqua Securityagainst: Aqua Security, JFrog Artifactory, Prisma Cloud
Five alternatives
Aikido Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, UptycsFive alternatives
ARMO Platform, Aqua Security, Kyverno, Sysdig Secure, TrivySix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizFive alternatives
Calico, Falco, Harbor, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorSix alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Tenable, WizMistral SmallAqua Security, Sysdig SecureAqua Security, Sysdig SecureHeldAqua SecurityTrivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
One alternative
WizTwo alternatives
Falco, KubescapeFour alternatives
Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Calico, Falco, KubescapeDeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Container, Sysdig SecureSysdig SecureChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, WizAqua SecurityTrivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Minimus, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, TrivyFour alternatives
Calico, Falco, Kubescape, TrivyFive alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizFive alternatives
Aikido Security, Calico, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerTwo alternatives
Falco, TrivyLlama 4 MaverickSysdig SecureFalco, KubescapeChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security, WizFive alternatives
ARMO Platform, Aqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, RAD Security, Sysdig SecureQwen 3.7 FlashAqua SecurityAqua Security, Sysdig SecureChangedSnyk ContainerTrivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Bridgecrew, Datadog Cloud Security Management, ELK Stack, Prisma Cloud, Qualys, Splunk, Sslabs, Tenable
Three alternatives
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Checkov, Falco, Kubescape, WazuhKimi K2Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureKubescapeChangedagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizAqua Security, Sysdig SecureFalco, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Six alternatives
Falco, Orca Security, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Trivy, WizFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Sysdig Secure, TrivySix alternatives
Falco, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Trivy, WizThree alternatives
Grype + Syft, Kube-bench, KubescapeGLM 4.7 FlashXAqua Security, Sysdig Secureagainst: Prisma CloudSysdig SecureChangedAqua Security, Prisma CloudTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro Cloud Oneno first choiceagainst: Anchore Community, Clair, Google Cloud Container Security, Microscanner, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
One alternative
Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, TrivyEight alternatives
Falco, JFrog Xray, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizFour alternatives
ARMO Platform, Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorMiniMax M2.5Aqua Security, Sysdig Secureagainst: WizSysdig SecureChangedAqua Security, Sysdig SecureTrivyno first choiceagainst: Wiz
Three alternatives
Falco, SUSE NeuVector, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, Prisma CloudSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, Google Cloud Container Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, WizTwo alternatives
Anchore, TigerGateBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 14:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:43 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:30 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:46 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:25 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:58 | yes | 8 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:43 | yes | 8 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 17 | 119 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:22 | yes | 12 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:01 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:52 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:56 | yes | 30 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:51 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:09 | yes | 7 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:48 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:44 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:46 | yes | 14 | 276 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:15 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:15 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:44 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:53 | yes | 18 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:10 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:07 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 13:06 | yes | 26 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:48 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:41 | yes | 8 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:34 | yes | 9 | 87 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:50 | yes | 8 | 85 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:45 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:50 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:23 | yes | 30 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:56 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 14:14 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 14:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:50 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 09:40 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:24 | yes | 28 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:07 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:42 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:29 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 6 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:52 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:32 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:51 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:16 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:34 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:30 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:59 | yes | 9 | 116 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:37 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:09 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:10 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:38 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:44 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 28 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:58 | no | 0 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:59 | yes | 29 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 30 | 126 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:09 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender for Cloud read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto (Prisma) read as Prisma Cloud
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS, powered by StackRox) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Snyk (Container Security) read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Sysdig (Secure/Monitor) read as Sysdig Secure
Trend read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Anchore Community
Elastic’s "Defend for Containers" (D4C)
GitLab Container Scanning
Microscanner
Sslabs
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.