ChartHop vs Orgvue
Nine of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; zero named Orgvue. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Orgvue by nine and ChartHop carries 48 labels and Orgvue 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgvue
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Orgvue were named in the same answer seventy-five times, of the 419 answers naming ChartHop and the 113 naming Orgvue. In those answers Orgvue took the first choice six times and ChartHop thirteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ChartHop Orgvue first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Orgvue on the right.The direct prompt
ChartHop first, Orgvue not the choice
9 of 14 modelsOrgvue was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ChartHop0%#8 of 13Orgvue—not namedChartHop28%#1 of 15Orgvue4%#7 of 15What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Orgvue
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Invest in Orgvue/Ingentis only if you have dedicated budget for complex workforce costing and global compliance requirements.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend Orgvue if your main need is organizational design plus workforce planning” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tools like *ChartHop*, *OrgVue*, or *Pingboard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for Deep Enterprise-Grade Modeling: Orgvue ... Caveat: Higher learning curve and significantly higher price point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.