Org charts and org design for enterprise buyers
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · OneDirectory 16%
22Orgvue16OneDirectory11OrgChart51others
22% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs draw.ioChartHop vs LucidchartChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs OneDirectoryOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs draw.ioOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs MiroOneDirectory vs OrgChartOneDirectory vs draw.ioOneDirectory vs LucidchartOneDirectory vs PingboardOneDirectory vs MiroOrgChart vs draw.ioOrgChart vs LucidchartOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs Mirodraw.io vs Lucidchartdraw.io vs Pingboarddraw.io vs MiroLucidchart vs PingboardLucidchart vs MiroPingboard vs Miro
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Orgvue22%
Orgvue22%02OneDirectory16%
OneDirectory16%03OrgChart11%
OrgChart11%04ChartHop9%
ChartHop9%05Ingentis org.manager7%
Ingentis org.manager7%06Nakisa Org Design Suite7%
Nakisa Org Design Suite7%07Lucidchart7%
Lucidchart7%08Organimi2%
Organimi2%09Creately2%
Creately2%10Microsoft Visio2%
Microsoft Visio2%11Pingboard0%
Pingboard0%12SmartDraw0%
SmartDraw0%13Microsoft PowerPoint0%
Microsoft PowerPoint0%14Miro0%
Miro0%What they warned about
Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Visio60%
25 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 13 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid (Unsuitable for scale): - Microsoft Visio: Primarily manual/diagramming-focused with shape limits” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Lucidchart51%
24 of 47 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 13 hard negative
“Generic diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Visio, SmartDraw, Canva, or draw.io ... not for enterprise org management” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Miro71%
15 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“General-Purpose Visual Whiteboards & Flowchart Tools (e.g., Lucidchart, Miro, Mural)... they fall short when treated as official, enterprise-wide org chart systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft PowerPoint100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 9 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid—or be highly cautious of—four distinct categories of org chart tools... Microsoft Visio and PowerPoint ... are arguably the most inefficient tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 920 links across 173 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · TheOrgChart.com47 answers · 82 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Gartner38 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OneDirectory37 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Org Chart Studio30 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · TeamOhana19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 38 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 11 models
37 answers · 10 models
30 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orgvue orgvue.com | 22% | 107 | 880 | 10 | 20,029 | $9,026 | 22 | |
| OneDirectory onedirectory.com | 16% | 5 | 170 | 0 | 3,468 | 1 | ||
| OrgChart orgchartstudio.com | 11% | 66 | 33,100 | 5 | 428 | |||
| ChartHop charthop.com | 9% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Nakisa Org Design Suite nakisa.com Nakisa Org Design Suite 7%, Nakisa Workforce Planning 2% | 9% | 19 | 0 | 5,231 | 7 | |||
| Ingentis ingentis.com Ingentis org.manager 7% | 7% | 73 | 30 | 0 | 11,481 company | 5 | ||
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 7% | 164 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| Organimi organimi.com | 2% | 115 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 | |
| OrgPlus orgplus.com | 2% | 1 | ||||||
| Functionly functionly.com | 2% | 39 | 1,300 | 0 | 45,770 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, theorgchart.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Orgvueno first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: LatticeOneDirectoryno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Word, Miro
Three alternatives
OneDirectory, Organimi, PingboardThree alternatives
ChartHop, Org Chart Studio, OrgChartGPT-5.4 miniLucidchartOrgvueChangedLucidchartagainst: MiroMicrosoft Visioagainst: Siftno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, OrgChartOne alternative
OrgChartThree alternatives
Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
OrgChartGemini 3.5 FlashNakisa Workforce Planning, Orgvueagainst: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioOrgvueChangedagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroNakisa Workforce Planning, OrgvueTeamOrgChartagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Pingboard, SiftChartHopagainst: The Orgagainst: BambooHR, Lattice, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Mural, Organimi, Pingboard
Five alternatives
Altify, ChartHop, DemandFarm, OneDirectory, SiftTwo alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Workforce PlanningFive alternatives
Beyond Intranet, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, TeamOhanaThree alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Organimi, SmartDrawTwo alternatives
Pingboard, SiftPerplexity SonarNakisa Org Design SuiteOrgvueChangedChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartagainst: CanvaOneDirectoryagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Mirono first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Freshteam, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, Sift, SmartDraw, draw.io
Four alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, VenngageOne alternative
Nakisa Org Design SuiteSeven alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Nakisa Org Design Suite, Orgvue, SmartDraw, WorkdayOne alternative
OrgChartGrok 4.20Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawOrgvueChangedNakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChartagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDrawOneDirectoryagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Org Chart Studio, Pingboard, SmartDrawOrgChartagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miroagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Excel/Google Sheets, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, Workday, draw.io
Two alternatives
ChartHop, OneDirectoryFour alternatives
ChartHop, Microsoft Visio, OneDirectory, Workday/SAP SuccessFactorsThree alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, OneDirectory, PingboardTwo alternatives
OrgChart, OrganimiTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PingboardMistral SmallIngentis org.manager, LucidchartChartHop, OrgvueChangedNakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChartagainst: Pingboard, SmartDrawIngentis org.manageragainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioChartHopagainst: Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Microsoft 365, SmartDrawTwo alternatives
Mega HOPEX, Power BITwo alternatives
Lucidchart, SiftFour alternatives
Microsoft Viva Insights, OrgChart, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce OrganizationDeepSeek V4 FlashOrgChartagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDrawOrgvueChangedIngentis org.manager, OrgChartCreately, OneDirectoryagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Lucidchart, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workdayagainst: Canva, Creately, Gliffy, Google Slides, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Oracle HCM Cloud, OrgCharting, Organimi, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, draw.io
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgvueThree alternatives
ChartHop, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayThree alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgvueOne alternative
OrgPlease!Six alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, OrgChart, OrgvueLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFunctionlyChangedno first choiceno first choiceOrgChartagainst: Microsoft Visio
Three alternatives
Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgBuilder by BCG X, OrgvueFour alternatives
Cloudairy, HR Directory 365, OneDirectory, PingboardQwen 3.7 FlashGoProfilesagainst: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioOrgChartProChangedagainst: Arithmetica, Excel, Microsoft VisioIngentis org.manager, OrgChartOrganimiagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visiono first choiceagainst: Canva, Excel, Google Sheets, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Prezi
Three alternatives
ChartHop, OrgChart, OrganimiTwo alternatives
ChartHop, WorkdayThree alternatives
ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgvueThree alternatives
OneDirectory, OrgChart, OrgChartPlusKimi K2ChartHopOrgvueChangedChartHop, OrgChartOneDirectoryagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, OrgCanvas, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: Creately, Excel, Gliffy, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Orgvue, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioTwo alternatives
Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectoryFour alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, PingboardTwo alternatives
OrgChart, OrgPlease!Four alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Workforce Planning, OneDirectory, OrgChartGLM 4.7 FlashXNakisa Org Design Suite, Orgvueagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Miro, SmartDrawLucidchart, OrgPlusChangedagainst: MiroOrgPlusagainst: Microsoft VisioOneDirectoryagainst: Lucidchart, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: Asana, Excel/Google Sheets, Google Drawings, Jira, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Monday.com, SmartDraw, Smartsheet, The Org
Seven alternatives
ChartHop, Happeo, Ingentis org.manager, Jostle, OneDirectory, OrgChart, PingboardOne alternative
Microsoft VisioThree alternatives
Lucidchart, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayOne alternative
OrgChartMiniMax M2.5OneDirectoryNakisa Org Design SuiteChangedNakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChartStraclagainst: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgCanvas, OrgChartOrgChartagainst: Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, draw.io
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartFour alternatives
Creately, Microsoft Visio, MindManager, MiroTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, OneDirectoryOne alternative
The OrgThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:56 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:40 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 22:03 | yes | 12 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:51 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:11 | yes | 28 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:28 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:54 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:04 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:10 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 21:41 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:50 | yes | 17 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:59 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:52 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 19:10 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:23 | yes | 17 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:06 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:29 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:51 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:22 | yes | 5 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:44 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:24 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 18 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:43 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 17:55 | yes | 27 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:29 | yes | 19 | 61 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:47 | yes | 18 | 54 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:25 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:05 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:36 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 17:53 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:06 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 37 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:16 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:53 | yes | 5 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:32 | yes | 21 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 12 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:47 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 21:23 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 21:51 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:43 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:57 | yes | 22 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:48 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 21:10 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:27 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:01 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:04 | yes | 28 | 89 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 21:46 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 18:19 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:28 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:37 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 20:12 | yes | 38 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:02 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 20:06 | yes | 24 | 87 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:38 | yes | 5 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:37 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:56 | yes | 17 | 43 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart/Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
ARIS
Altify (by Upland)
Arithmetica
Cortextual
Mega HOPEX
OrgBuilder by BCG X
OrgChartPlus
OrgChartPro
OrgCharting
OrgWiki
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Organization
Signavio
Software AG Alfabet
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Stracl
native modules in Workday/SAP SuccessFactors
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.