Index › HR › Onboarding and employee experience › Employee onboarding › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Employee onboarding for small business buyers
Asked as “employee onboarding software”, and as “new hire onboarding platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47BambooHR21Gusto13Connecteam19others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+13Since October 2026: 34% → 47%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.BambooHR held the lead, +13 points on 34%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BambooHR47%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 34% → 47%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Rippling28%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 25% → 28%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Workday45%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 47% → 45%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
BambooHR47%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 34% → 47%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketRippling28%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 25% → 28%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseWorkday45%Clear leader▼−2Since October 2026: 47% → 45%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01BambooHR47%15%67endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 34% → 47%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.34% → 47%
BambooHR47%15%67endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 34% → 47%, +13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.34% → 47%02
Gusto21%11%65accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 21% → 21%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.21% → 21%
Gusto21%11%65accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 21% → 21%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.21% → 21%03
Connecteam13%4%24accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 5% → 13%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 13%
Connecteam13%4%24accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 5% → 13%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 13%04
TalentHR11%0%11accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 3% → 11%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 11%
TalentHR11%0%11accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 3% → 11%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 11%05Rippling4%20%55accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Rippling4%20%55accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%06
Zoho People4%0%13accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
Zoho People4%0%13accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Enboarder0%27%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Enboarder0%27%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Deel0%19%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Deel0%19%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%07
Trainual0%4%24accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Trainual0%4%24accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%09
WorkBright0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
WorkBright0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Rippling vs Zoho PeopleRippling vs GustoRippling vs HiBobBambooHR vs ConnecteamBambooHR vs Workable HRBambooHR vs Zoho PeopleBambooHR vs GustoBambooHR vs HiBobConnecteam vs Workable HRConnecteam vs Zoho PeopleConnecteam vs GustoConnecteam vs HiBobWorkable HR vs Zoho PeopleWorkable HR vs GustoWorkable HR vs HiBobZoho People vs GustoZoho People vs HiBobGusto vs HiBob
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01BambooHR47%
BambooHR47%02Gusto21%
Gusto21%03Connecteam13%
Connecteam13%04TalentHR11%
TalentHR11%05Rippling4%
Rippling4%06Zoho People4%
Zoho People4%07Trainual0%
Trainual0%08Deel0%
Deel0%09WorkBright0%
WorkBright0%10Enboarder0%
Enboarder0%What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid (by Category) ... Enterprise-Grade Heavyweights (e.g., Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM Cloud)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Rippling20%
11 of 55 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“If you don’t need the IT provisioning / device work Rippling is built for... the effective cost per hire is higher than it appears.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
BambooHR15%
10 of 67 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“the effective cost per hire is higher than it appears... BambooHR and Rippling publish entry fees; selected modules and the complete service package still need a quote.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Gusto11%
7 of 65 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Gusto is widely praised for payroll, but there are distinct functional gaps for businesses focused strictly on onboarding.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 740 links across 196 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
41 answers · 67 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zapier31 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HiBob20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · TalentHR17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Gusto15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Asana15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee onboarding software”, “employee onboarding software”, “onboarding platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 47% | 1074 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | 1 |
| Gusto gusto.com | 21% | 742 | 673,000 | 10,560 | 1,629,483 | 118 | ||
| Connecteam connecteam.com | 13% | 693 | 49,500 | 288 | 312,449 | $13,504 | 120 | |
| TalentHR talenthr.io | 11% | 89 | 480 | 1 | 89,831 | 32 | ||
| Rippling rippling.com | 4% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 4% | 4% | 309 | 6,600 | 50 | ||||
| Trainual trainual.com | 0% | 107 | 22,200 | 94 | 40,498 | 10 | ||
| Deel deel.com | 0% | 480 | 40,500 | 1,210 | 307,175 | $330,608 | 118 | |
| WorkBright workbright.com | 0% | 32 | 5,400 | 86 | 12,280 | 6 | ||
| Factorial factorialhr.com | 0% | 124 | 27,100 | 304,748 | 141,409 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fitsmallbusiness.com, hibob.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best employee onboarding software” is paycor.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee onboarding software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which new hire onboarding platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top onboarding platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee onboarding software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an employee onboarding software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which onboarding platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BambooHR, GustoBambooHR, GustoHeldGustoZoho Peopleno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Homebase, RipplingTwo alternatives
Deel, RipplingFour alternatives
BambooHR, Homebase, Rippling, TrainualFour alternatives
BambooHR, BreatheHR, FirstHR, GustoGPT-5.4 miniGustoagainst: RipplingGustoHeldGustoGustoagainst: Ripplingno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BambooHR, WorkBrightThree alternatives
Rippling, Trainual, WorkBrightThree alternatives
BambooHR, Rippling, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
ADP RUN, BambooHRGemini 3.5 FlashRipplingRipplingHeldGustoZoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: Gainsight, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Totango, Workday
Five alternatives
BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Process Street, TrainualThree alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, TrainualFour alternatives
BambooHR, Deel, Rippling, TrainualNine alternatives
Connecteam, Google Forms, Gusto, Homebase, Notion, OnPay, Trainual, Trello, WaybookSix alternatives
BambooHR, Enboarder, Gusto, Rippling, Sapling, TrainualPerplexity SonarBambooHRBambooHRHeldBambooHR, Gustoagainst: RipplingTalentHRno first choiceagainst: Gusto, Monday.com, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Sage HR, Workday, Workforce.com
Five alternatives
CharlieHR, Deel, Gusto, Rippling, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
Deel, Gusto, Rippling, TrainualThree alternatives
Trainual, Waybook, Workable HRTwo alternatives
BambooHR, GustoGrok 4.20BambooHRBambooHRHeldConnecteam, GustoConnecteamagainst: Continu, Enboarder, Google Workspace, Notion, Ripplingno first choiceagainst: Workdayagainst: Bambee, Deel, Multiplier, Paycom, Remote, Rippling
Four alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, Rippling, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, RipplingFive alternatives
BambooHR, Enboarder, Factorial, TalentLMS, TrainualTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
BambooHR, HiBob, Rippling, WorkBrightMistral SmallBambooHRBambooHRHeldGustoConnecteam, TalentHRno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Enboarder
Four alternatives
CharlieHR, Enboarder, Factorial, TalentHRTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingFive alternatives
BambooHR, Deel, Donut, Rippling, TrainualOne alternative
BambooHRDeepSeek V4 FlashBambooHRBambooHRHeldagainst: RipplingBambooHR, GustoConnecteamagainst: BambooHRBambooHRagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Connecteam, Enboarder, Gusto, Namely, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex Flex, Sapling, Waybook, Workday
Five alternatives
Connecteam, Factorial, Gusto, Rippling, TrainualOne alternative
GustoSix alternatives
Connecteam, Deel, Rippling, Sapling, Trainual, Workable HRThree alternatives
Gusto, TalentHR, Zoho PeopleFour alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, HiBob, RipplingLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBambooHRChangedBambooHRConnecteamno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Gusto, Paylocity, Rippling, ZenefitsFour alternatives
Gusto, OnPay, QuickBooks Workforce, RipplingThree alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, LeapsomeQwen 3.7 FlashGustoBambooHRChangedBambooHR, Gustoagainst: WorkdayGustono first choiceagainst: ADP RUN, BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, QuickBooks Workforce, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Enboarder, Onboardbase, TrainualTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingFour alternatives
Deel, Orbit, Remote, RipplingSeven alternatives
Airtable, DocuSign, Google Docs, Google Forms, Notion, PandaDoc, RipplingKimi K2BambooHRBambooHRHeldagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayBambooHR, GustoConnecteamagainst: BambooHRno first choiceagainst: Asana, Monday.com, Notionagainst: ADP RUN, BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Five alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, Rippling, WorkBright, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingFour alternatives
Connecteam, Deel, Remote, RipplingThree alternatives
Gusto, Innform, TalentHRGLM 4.7 FlashXBambooHRGustoChangedBambooHR, RipplingConnecteamagainst: BambooHRno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
CharlieHR, Deel, Gusto, Rippling, WaybookTwo alternatives
BambooHR, WaybookFive alternatives
Gusto, SkyPrep, TalentLMS, Trainual, iSpring Learn LMSThree alternatives
Innform, Pebb, TalentHRMiniMax M2.5BambooHR, GustoBambooHRChangedBambooHRagainst: RipplingTalentHRno first choiceagainst: Workdayagainst: ADP RUN, Gusto, Trainual
Two alternatives
Connecteam, RipplingThree alternatives
Gusto, Rippling, WorkBrightThree alternatives
Gusto, Trainual, WorkBrightFive alternatives
BambooHR, Connecteam, Gusto, Qualee, Zoho PeopleGPT-6 LunaBambooHRGustoChangedGustoTalentHRagainst: Gustono first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Deel, Rippling
Three alternatives
Gusto, Rippling, TrainualOne alternative
TrainualSix alternatives
BambooHR, Connecteam, Deel, Rippling, Trainual, Zoho PeopleOne alternative
Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30BBambooHRBambooHRHeldBambooHRagainst: ADP Workforce Now, HiBobTalentHRagainst: BambooHRBambooHRagainst: BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Kallidus Sapling, Rippling, Workday
Four alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, Rippling, TalentHRTwo alternatives
Gusto, WaybookSix alternatives
Connecteam, Factorial, Gusto, Rippling, TalentHR, WorkBrightThree alternatives
Connecteam, Qualee, Zoho People Essential HRTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 13 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 23 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:44 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:38 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 20 | 51 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 19 | 73 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:39 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 14 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:57 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:43 | no | 0 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | no | 0 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:07 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:48 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 22 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 24 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
Workable read as Workable HR
Unresolved, counted raw
Envoy
Moxo
Onboardbase
Orbit (formerly Donut/Glint)
SignWell
Tallyfy
Totango
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.