Time and attendance for enterprise buyers
Asked as “time and attendance system”, and as “employee time tracking software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Workday Time Tracking 10%
29UKG Pro Workforce Management10Workday Time Tracking08Rippling53others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.UKG Pro Workforce Management held the lead, −3 points on 32%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Homebase22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Homebase (22%) replaces Harvest (23% then, 15% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Rippling15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rippling (15%) replaces Clockify (12% then, 12% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
UKG Pro Workforce Management29%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Homebase22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Homebase (22%) replaces Harvest (23% then, 15% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketRippling15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rippling (15%) replaces Clockify (12% then, 12% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseUKG Pro Workforce Management29%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01UKG Pro Workforce Management29%10%51accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.32% → 29%
UKG Pro Workforce Management29%10%51accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.32% → 29%02
Workday Time Tracking10%5%44accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 10%
Workday Time Tracking10%5%44accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 10%03Rippling8%8%26accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%
Rippling8%8%26accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%04
Deputy6%14%29accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Deputy6%14%29accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%05
Replicon6%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
Replicon6%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%06
UKG Ready5%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
UKG Ready5%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%07
Dayforce Workforce Management3%5%22accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%
Dayforce Workforce Management3%5%22accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%08
Paycom3%0%14accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%
Paycom3%0%14accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%09
ADP Workforce Now2%14%36accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 14% → 2%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 2%
ADP Workforce Now2%14%36accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 14% → 2%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 2%10
Connecteam2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Connecteam2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Oracle Time and Labor0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Oracle Time and Labor0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Rippling vs DeputyRippling vs JibbleRippling vs TimeCampRippling vs ConnecteamClockify vs HomebaseClockify vs Toggl TrackClockify vs DeputyClockify vs JibbleClockify vs TimeCampClockify vs ConnecteamHomebase vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs DeputyHomebase vs JibbleHomebase vs TimeCampHomebase vs ConnecteamToggl Track vs DeputyToggl Track vs JibbleToggl Track vs TimeCampToggl Track vs ConnecteamDeputy vs JibbleDeputy vs TimeCampDeputy vs ConnecteamJibble vs TimeCampJibble vs ConnecteamTimeCamp vs Connecteam
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011
1213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01UKG Pro Workforce Management29%
UKG Pro Workforce Management29%02Workday Time Tracking10%
Workday Time Tracking10%03Rippling8%
Rippling8%04Deputy6%
Deputy6%05Replicon6%
Replicon6%06UKG Ready5%
UKG Ready5%07Dayforce Workforce Management3%
Dayforce Workforce Management3%08Paycom3%
Paycom3%09ADP Workforce Now2%
ADP Workforce Now2%10Connecteam2%
Connecteam2%11SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%
SAP SuccessFactors Time Management0%12Synerion0%
Synerion0%13Oracle Time and Labor0%
Oracle Time and Labor0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Clockify75%
6 of 8 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“one 2026 review specifically judged Clockify unsuitable for organizations with 1,000 or more employees” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Deputy14%
4 of 29 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Absolutely avoid for your use case: ... most mid-market tools like Deputy” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
UKG Pro Workforce Management10%
5 of 51 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Legacy or Outdated Systems (e.g., older Kronos versions, manual logs, basic card/biometric without integration): Why avoid?” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now14%
5 of 36 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“For standalone time/attendance, UKG itself is often considered more feature-complete than the OEM ADP version.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 922 links across 274 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Lead Change Group25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Nowsta25 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Synerion24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 22 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ADP13 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Workday12 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 12 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 12 models
14 answers · 12 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time and attendance system”, “time and attendance system”, “time and attendance systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UKG Ready ukg.com UKG Pro Workforce Management 29%, UKG Ready 5%, UKG Pro / UKG Ready 3%, UKG Ready/UKG 2% | 39% | 267 | 18,100 | 215 | 310,168 | $11,996 | 120 | |
| Workday parent site Workday Time Tracking 10% | 10% | 43 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| Rippling rippling.com | 8% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | 9 |
| Deputy deputy.com | 6% | 356 | 40,500 | 17,000 | 45,127 | $3,222 | 32 | |
| Replicon deltek.com | 6% | 27 | 9,900 | 128 | 225,755 | $763 | 120 | |
| actiTIME actitime.com | 5% | 14 | ||||||
| ADP parent site ADP Workforce Management 3%, ADP Workforce Now 2% | 5% | 508 | 2,740,000 | 23,897 | ||||
| Dayforce dayforce.com Dayforce Workforce Management 3% | 3% | 23 | 450,000 | 2,983 | 208,252 company | 38 | 3 | |
| Paycom paycom.com | 3% | 244 | 550,000 | 3,427 | 760,349 | $2,652 | 13 | |
| Connecteam connecteam.com | 2% | 693 | 49,500 | 288 | 312,449 | $13,504 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best time and attendance system” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best time and attendance system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee time tracking software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade time and attendance systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time and attendance system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a time and attendance system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time and attendance systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choicePaycom, UKG ReadyChangedHROne, Rippling, UKG Pro Workforce Management, UKG Readyno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Replicon, TimeCampFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Deputy, Paychex FlexGPT-5.4 miniUKG Pro Workforce ManagementADP Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingChangedDayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: RipplingADP Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, WorkForce Softwareagainst: Ripplingno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP WorkForce Suite, ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
Deputy, PaycomThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingGemini 3.5 FlashRepliconRepliconHeldagainst: Harvest, QuickBooks TimeUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce Managementno first choiceagainst: ADP eTime, Clockify, Depot, Homebase, Kronos Workforce Central on-premise, QuickBooks Time, Sling, When I Work
Seven alternatives
ADP Vantage HCM, ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, WorkForce Software, Workday Time TrackingFive alternatives
Clockify, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Toggl Track, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingFive alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Cloud Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, WorkForce Software, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, Replicon, TCP Software, Workday Time TrackingPerplexity SonarUKG Pro Workforce Management, UKG ReadyRepliconChangedDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: DeputyTCP Software—particularly TimeClock Plusno first choiceagainst: Clockify
Six alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Paycom, Rippling, TCP Humanity, TimeClock PlusSix alternatives
BigTime, Kantata, Tempo Timesheets, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time Tracking, actiTIMEEight alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Time and Labor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Synerion, TCP Software, TimeClock Plus, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Synerion, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementGrok 4.20Ripplingagainst: ADP RUN or Workforce Now, Buddy Punch, ConnecteamReplicon, Workday Time Tracking, actiTIMEChangedagainst: Clockify, Toggl TrackUKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: BambooHR Time TrackingUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: Clockify, Homebaseagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Paylocity, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time Tracking
Two alternatives
Paycom, UKG Ready/ProFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Paycom, RipplingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Time and Labor, Workday Time TrackingFive alternatives
Connecteam, Day.io, Deputy, Rippling, SynerionMistral SmallUKG Pro Workforce ManagementPaylocityChangedRippling, UKG ReadyConnecteam, Deputyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Synerion, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Deltek Replicon Time, Paycom, TimeTrex, Toggl TrackThree alternatives
HROne, Tanda, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Synerion, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashRippling, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: ADP Workforce NowUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, When I WorkUKG Pro / UKG Readyagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Clockify, Dayforce Workforce Management, Harvest, TMetric, Toggl Track, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, TimeClock PlusFour alternatives
ADP Vantage, ADP Workforce Now, Clockify, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM — Time & Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
Connecteam, Oracle Time and Labor, actiTIMESix alternatives
ADP Timekeeping Plus, Paycom, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, TCP Software, Workforce.comLlama 4 Maverickno first choicePaycomChangedno first choiceDeputyno first choicenothing named
Nine alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Del, Deputy, QuickBooks Time, TimeTrex, Toggl Track, Wrike, actiTIMEThree alternatives
Connecteam, Synerion, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementQwen 3.7 FlashDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Ready/UKGUKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingChangedDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementactiTIMEUKG Pro Workforce Managementnothing named
Two alternatives
Rippling, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Dayforce Workforce Management, Jira, Paycom, WrikeFour alternatives
Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Synerion, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Time Clock Wizard, TimeTrex Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Day.io, Deputy, TimeClock PlusKimi K2Rippling, UKG Pro / UKG ReadyUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementactiTIMEagainst: ClockifyUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: Connecteam, Deputyagainst: Icon Time / Timesource, Paychex Time in a Box, TimeForce, UKG Pro Workforce Management
One alternative
ADP Workforce NowThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Paycor, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, TCP Software, Workday Time TrackingGLM 4.7 FlashXDayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementClickTime, TimeCampChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementDeputyagainst: Workday Time Trackingno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, Workday Time TrackingThree alternatives
Replicon, TMetric, Workday Time TrackingSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Dayforce Workforce Management, Nowsta, TimeClock Plus, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Connecteam, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementMiniMax M2.5UKG Pro Workforce ManagementWorkday Time TrackingChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementADP Workforce NowRippling, UKG Pro Workforce Managementnothing named
Four alternatives
ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, Rippling, SynerionThree alternatives
PPM Express Time, Replicon, actiTIMESix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Time and Labor, Replicon, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Paylocity, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Deputy, KekaGPT-6 LunaWorkday Time TrackingUKG Pro Workforce ManagementChangedno first choiceDeputyno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Time and Labor, QuickBooks Time, UKG Ready
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, Dayforce Workforce Management, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementThree alternatives
ADP Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BRippling, UKG ReadyUKG Pro HCM, Workday Time TrackingChangedUKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG ReadyJibble, TimeClickagainst: Deputy, TCP Humanityno first choiceagainst: HROne, UKG Pro Workforce Management
One alternative
ADP RUNThree alternatives
Connecteam, Jibble, SAP SuccessFactors HCM SuiteFive alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Dayforce Workforce Management, Oracle Time and Labor, SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, Workday Time TrackingTwo alternatives
Stratus-io, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:53 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 22 | 86 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:33 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 23 | 105 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 22 | 50 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 9 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 25 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 24 | 226 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 74 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:57 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:36 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:27 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:17 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 19 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 22 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 9 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:10 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 9 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (Enterprise Solutions) read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time and Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Time Tracking
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce (Ceridian) read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce (by Ceridian) read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce (formerly Ceridian Dayforce) read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce (formerly Ceridian) read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Kronos read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Kronos (Now UKG) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Kronos (UKG Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Oracle read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM Cloud Time & Labor read as Oracle Time and Labor
Oracle HCM Cloud – Time & Labor read as Oracle Time and Labor
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
Toggl read as Toggl Track
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (UKG Pro Workforce Management) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (formerly Kronos + Ultimate Software) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (formerly Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Workday read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday HCM read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday HCM (with Time Tracking) read as Workday Time Tracking
Workday HCM with Workday Time Tracking read as Workday Time Tracking
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP RUN or Workforce Now
ADP Timekeeping Plus
ADP eTime
Del
Deltek
Deltek Replicon Time
Guidepoint's Kronos
Kronos Workforce Central on-premise
Oracle Cloud Time and Labor
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM — Time & Labor
PPM Express Time
SAP SuccessFactors HCM Suite
SAP SuccessFactors Time & Attendance
Stratus-io
TCP Software—particularly TimeClock Plus
Tanda
Tempo Timesheets
Time Clock Wizard
TimeForce (Acquired by iSolved HCM)
TimeTrex Workforce Management
UKG Pro HCM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.