Time and attendance
Asked as “time and attendance system”, and as “employee time tracking software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Clockify 12%
15Rippling12Clockify12Homebase62others
15% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rippling (15%) replaces Clockify (12% then, 12% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Rippling leads at 15%, replacing Clockify, which led at 12% and stands at 12% now: 3 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Homebase22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Homebase (22%) replaces Harvest (23% then, 15% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Rippling15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rippling (15%) replaces Clockify (12% then, 12% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterprise
UKG Pro Workforce Management29%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Homebase22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Homebase (22%) replaces Harvest (23% then, 15% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketRippling15%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rippling (15%) replaces Clockify (12% then, 12% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterpriseUKG Pro Workforce Management29%Contested▼−3Since October 2026: 32% → 29%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Rippling15%0%27accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 6% → 15%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 15%
Rippling15%0%27accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 6% → 15%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 15%02
Clockify12%11%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 12%
Clockify12%11%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 12%03Homebase12%9%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%
Homebase12%9%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%04
Toggl Track12%10%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%
Toggl Track12%10%10accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%05
Deputy10%3%35accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%
Deputy10%3%35accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%06
Jibble10%0%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
Jibble10%0%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%07
TimeCamp4%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
TimeCamp4%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
Connecteam2%0%40accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
Connecteam2%0%40accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%09
Buddy Punch2%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Buddy Punch2%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
UKG Ready2%6%16accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
UKG Ready2%6%16accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%11
Paylocity2%6%16accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 2%
Paylocity2%6%16accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 12% → 2%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 2%12
Paycom2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Paycom2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17UKG Pro Workforce Management0%29%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
UKG Pro Workforce Management0%29%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
ADP Workforce Now0%17%23accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%
ADP Workforce Now0%17%23accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%15BambooHR Time Tracking0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13QuickBooks Time0%10%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
16
When I Work0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
When I Work0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Rippling vs DeputyRippling vs JibbleRippling vs TimeCampRippling vs ConnecteamClockify vs HomebaseClockify vs Toggl TrackClockify vs DeputyClockify vs JibbleClockify vs TimeCampClockify vs ConnecteamHomebase vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs DeputyHomebase vs JibbleHomebase vs TimeCampHomebase vs ConnecteamToggl Track vs DeputyToggl Track vs JibbleToggl Track vs TimeCampToggl Track vs ConnecteamDeputy vs JibbleDeputy vs TimeCampDeputy vs ConnecteamJibble vs TimeCampJibble vs ConnecteamTimeCamp vs Connecteam
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Q13
14B15
1617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Rippling15%
Rippling15%02Clockify12%
Clockify12%03Homebase12%
Homebase12%04Toggl Track12%
Toggl Track12%05Deputy10%
Deputy10%06Jibble10%
Jibble10%07TimeCamp4%
TimeCamp4%08Connecteam2%
Connecteam2%09Buddy Punch2%
Buddy Punch2%10UKG Ready2%
UKG Ready2%11Paylocity2%
Paylocity2%12Paycom2%
Paycom2%13QuickBooks Time0%
14ADP Workforce Now0%
ADP Workforce Now0%15BambooHR Time Tracking0%
16When I Work0%
When I Work0%17UKG Pro Workforce Management0%
UKG Pro Workforce Management0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
UKG Pro Workforce Management29%
6 of 21 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Enterprise-Level Platforms for Small Businesses (e.g., UKG, ADP Workforce Now, Paycom): ... smaller businesses ... frequently report painful, drawn-out implementations, expensive setup fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
ADP Workforce Now17%
4 of 23 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Enterprise-Level Platforms for Small Businesses (e.g., UKG, ADP Workforce Now, Paycom): ... expensive setup fees, bloated interfaces, and lower-tier customer service routing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
BambooHR Time Tracking
15%
3 of 20 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Simpler and more affordable for lighter needs, but less robust for complex T&A in mid-market” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
QuickBooks Time
10%
3 of 30 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Check that its payroll and scheduling features meet your needs before choosing it as a full workforce-management system.” GPT-6 Luna, comparative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 805 links across 229 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
33 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group29 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TrackingTime16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Synerion13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time and attendance system”, “time and attendance system”, “time and attendance systems”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rippling rippling.com | 15% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | 9 |
| Clockify clockify.me | 12% | 133 | 60,500 | 1,093 | 2,084,749 | 40 | ||
| Homebase joinhomebase.com | 12% | 353 | 201,000 | 3,839 | 472,253 | $793 | 120 | |
| Toggl toggl.com Toggl Track 12% | 12% | 40 | 12,100 | 89 | 257,259 company | 30 | ||
| Deputy deputy.com | 10% | 356 | 40,500 | 17,000 | 45,127 | $3,222 | 32 | |
| Jibble jibble.io | 10% | 57 | 9,900 | 108 | 67,211 | 1 | ||
| Synerion synerion.com | 6% | 22 | ||||||
| TimeCamp timecamp.com | 4% | 33 | 2,400 | 48 | 132,103 | 2 | ||
| ClickTime clicktime.com | 4% | 6 | ||||||
| Connecteam connecteam.com | 2% | 693 | 49,500 | 288 | 312,449 | $13,504 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best time and attendance system” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best time and attendance system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee time tracking software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top time and attendance systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time and attendance system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a time and attendance system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time and attendance systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PaycomToggl TrackChangedDeputyClockify, Jibbleagainst: Homebaseno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Paylocity, RipplingFour alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, Harvest, PaycomThree alternatives
Connecteam, Jibble, QuickBooks TimeOne alternative
ConnecteamGPT-5.4 miniUKG ReadyPaylocity, RipplingChangedUKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: HomebaseHomebaseagainst: QuickBooks Timeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Connecteam, Gusto, QuickBooks Time, RipplingFour alternatives
Buddy Punch, OnTheClock, Toggl Track, UKG ReadySix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Clockify, Deputy, Paylocity, Replicon, RipplingTwo alternatives
When I Work, ZoomShiftGemini 3.5 FlashRipplingagainst: UKG Pro Workforce ManagementHarvestChangedRipplingConnecteam, Homebaseno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Five alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, ClickTime, Paylocity, Replicon, UKG ReadyThree alternatives
Clockify, Hubstaff, Toggl TrackNine alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Buddy Punch, Clockify, Connecteam, Deputy, Jibble, Paylocity, QuickBooks Time, When I WorkThree alternatives
Clockify, OnTheClock, When I WorkEight alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Depot Systems / QuickFMS, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, TCP Software, UKG Ready/UKG, WorkForce SoftwarePerplexity SonarRipplingClickTimeChangedDeputyJibbleno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Paycor, Synerion, UKG ReadyFive alternatives
BigTime, Deputy, Everhour, Keka, QuickBooks TimeNine alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Clockify, Connecteam, Hubstaff, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, Synerion, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementFour alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, Homebase, TimeCampGrok 4.20Ripplingagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Gusto, PaylocityToggl TrackChangedRipplingClockifyagainst: Deputy, QuickBooks Timeno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Bambee, Easy Clocking / WorkEasy Software, Gusto, Paychex Time & Attendance, Proliant, TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce Management, uAttend
Two alternatives
Paycom, UKG ReadyFour alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, Harvest, TimeCampSix alternatives
ADP RUN, ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Paycom, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
Homebase, TimeCampMistral SmallSynerionTMetricChangedUKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingJibble, TimeCampno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved TimeFour alternatives
Apploye, Citadel Time Clock, QuickBooks Time, TimeCampFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Deputy, EmpeonFour alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, OnTheClockDeepSeek V4 FlashTCP HumanityToggl TrackChangedDeputy, Homebase, UKG Pro Workforce Managementagainst: Workday Time TrackingClockify, Homebaseno first choiceagainst: ADP Time & Labor Management / ADP Workforce, Advanced Time & Attendance, ClockShark, Paycor Time & Attendance, TriNet
Five alternatives
Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Deputy, Rippling, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
Clockify, HarvestSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Dayforce Workforce Management, Jibble, QuickBooks TimeThree alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, TimeCampLlama 4 MaverickSynerionno first choiceChangedDeputyTimeCampno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Factorial, Microsoft Teams, isolved TimeFour alternatives
Connecteam, Homebase, OnTheClock, QuickBooks TimeQwen 3.7 FlashDeputyagainst: UKG Pro Workforce ManagementToggl TrackChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementHomebaseno first choiceagainst: Paycom, TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Three alternatives
OnTheClock, QuickBooks Time, SynerionFive alternatives
BambooHR Time Tracking, Deputy, Float, Harvest, RipplingEight alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Connecteam, Deputy, Gusto, Jibble, Rippling, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Clockify, Connecteam, Deputy, JibbleKimi K2Ripplingagainst: BambooHR Time TrackingClickTime, Toggl TrackChangedUKG Pro Workforce ManagementClockify, Jibbleno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, UKG/Kronos
Three alternatives
Paylocity, Synerion, UKG ReadyThree alternatives
Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, TMetricSeven alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR Time Tracking, Clockify, Homebase, Paycor, TimeCamp, When I WorkFour alternatives
Connecteam, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, TimeCampGLM 4.7 FlashXDeputy, RipplingDeputyChangedno first choiceClockifyno first choiceagainst: Clocking Systems, Timeforce / iSolved HCM, Timetrak Time and Attendance, Tyler Time & Attendance, UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) products
Four alternatives
Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, Synerion, TimeCampTwo alternatives
Connecteam, QuickBooks TimeNine alternatives
ClockShark, Connecteam, Deputy, Homebase, QuickBooks Time, Rippling, TimeTrex, UKG Ready, ZimyoSeven alternatives
Buddy Punch, Deputy, Homebase, Hubstaff, Jibble, QuickBooks Time, TimeCampMiniMax M2.5Deputy, Ripplingagainst: ClockifyBuddy PunchChangedagainst: UKG Readyno first choiceClockifyno first choiceagainst: BambooHR Time Tracking, Clockify, Toggl Tracknothing named
Three alternatives
Connecteam, Paylocity, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
Monday.com, QuickBooks TimeThree alternatives
Homebase, TimeCamp, When I WorkGPT-6 LunaRipplingRippling Time & AttendanceChangedADP RUNagainst: QuickBooks TimeHomebaseagainst: Clockifyno first choiceagainst: SwipeClock-branded biometric clocks, UKG Pro Workforce Management
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, UKG ReadyThree alternatives
ClickTime, Deputy, UKG ReadyFive alternatives
Connecteam, Deputy, Paylocity, Rippling, UKG Ready/UKGOne alternative
ConnecteamMuse Glimmer 30BDeputy, SynerionToggl TrackChangedno first choiceHomebase, Jibbleno first choiceagainst: Advanced Time and Attendance, Blip, BrightHR, Mitrefinch, Paychex Time & Attendance, Time Clock Pro plugin, UKG, formerly Kronos, WINTMS, Wasp Barcode Technologies clocks, WordPress Time Clock
Four alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, TimeClock Plus, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementFour alternatives
Clockify, Harvest, Hubstaff, QuickBooks TimeEight alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Buddy Punch, Connecteam, Factorial, Paycom, Rippling, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday Time TrackingFour alternatives
Clockify, Open Time Clock, TimeCamp, TimeTrakGOBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 15 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:02 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 15 | 155 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 8 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 10 | 57 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 15 | 102 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:02 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:37 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 19 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 13 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 22 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 25 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP (RUN Powered by ADP) read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time & Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
ADP Time and Attendance read as ADP Workforce Now
BambooHR read as BambooHR Time Tracking
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Dayforce read as Dayforce Workforce Management
Kronos read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Paychex (Time & Attendance module) read as Paychex Time & Attendance
QuickBooks Workforce read as QuickBooks Time
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management
Toggl read as Toggl Track
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Software) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Workday read as Workday Time Tracking
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP Time & Labor Management / ADP Workforce
Advanced Time & Attendance
Advanced Time and Attendance
AtTrack
Blip
Citadel Time Clock
Clocking Systems
Depot Systems / QuickFMS
Easy Clocking / WorkEasy Software
Empeon
Lac Viet
Mitrefinch
Paycor Time & Attendance
Rippling Time & Attendance
SwipeClock-branded biometric clocks
Time Clock Pro plugin
Timeforce / iSolved HCM
Timetrak Time and Attendance
Tyler Time & Attendance
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) products
UKG, formerly Kronos
WINTMS
Wasp Barcode Technologies clocks
WordPress Time Clock
nTask
uAttend
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.