September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published . The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index › GTM › Sales › Sales enablement · September 2026 Edition

Sales enablement and content

Asked as “sales enablement platform”, and as “sales content management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 22 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · HubSpot Sales Hub 23%
32Highspot23HubSpot Sales Hub23Showpad23others

32% of first choices, contested.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Highspot32%42%33criticized defaultnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 32% now.
02HubSpot Sales Hub23%0%16accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 23% now.
03Showpad23%31%26criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 23% now.
04SalesHood9%0%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 9% now.
05MindTickle5%20%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Seismic0%63%30criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
07Bigtincan0%50%12criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
06Allego0%0%11accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 12 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Highspot32%
02HubSpot Sales Hub23%
03Showpad23%
04SalesHood9%
05MindTickle5%
06Allego0%
07Bigtincan0%
08Seismic0%

What they warned about

Zero of six models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Perplexity Sonar Pro changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Highspot
42%
14 of 33 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 3 hard negative
“you should entirely avoid enterprise-grade sales enablement platforms like Highspot, Seismic, or Mindtickle” Gemini 3.1 Pro, budget prompt
Seismic
63%
19 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid if you lack implementation resources | Recent verified-review summaries flag complex implementation” GPT-5.6 Sol, negative prompt
Showpad
31%
8 of 26 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-oriented platforms such as Showpad, Highspot, or Seismic” GPT-5.6 Sol, budget prompt
Bigtincan
50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 5 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Vendors I'd flag for extra diligence ... Bigtincan (I recall financial and ownership pressure that could affect roadmap stability — verify current status)” Claude Opus 5, negative prompt

What they cite

Six of the six models returned a source list in this edition: six return the pages they cited.

Sites the answers cite

32 of 36 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 6 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 575 links across 193 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 36 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Dock16 answers · 26 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Highspot15 answers · 33 citations · 6 models
vendor site · MindTickle15 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Salesmotion13 answers · 13 citations · 4 models
vendor site · SalesHood12 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Seismic11 answers · 15 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Showpad11 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
10 answers · 38 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Allego10 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
vendor site · HubSpot10 answers · 12 citations · 4 models
vendor site · CaptivateIQ9 answers · 10 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Capterra8 answers · 10 citations · 4 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sales enablement platform”, “sales enablement platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Highspot highspot.com32%37514,80025547,37952
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Sales Hub 23%, HubSpot Content Hub 0%
23%687368,0009,776
Showpad showpad.com23%1474,4007611,38745
SalesHood saleshood.com9%10972011,6280
MindTickle mindtickle.com5%3152,900604,413193
Paperflite paperflite.com5%347201317,3870
Showell showell.com5%20
Allego allego.com0%2085,4005812,354$88329
Dock dock.us0%27190,50081,22239,01608
Spekit spekit.com0%1001,900153,062$8633

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (captivateiq.com, dock.us, highspot.com, mindtickle.com, seismic.com). The first result for “best sales enablement platform” is revenuebase.ai.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best sales enablement platform for a mid-market B2B software company?”Paraphrase“Which sales content management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B software company?”Comparative“What are the top sales enablement platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best sales enablement platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a sales enablement platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which sales enablement platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5MindTickle, Showpad
Six alternativesAllego, Consensus, Dock, Google Drive, Guru, SharePoint
against: Highspot, Seismic
ShowpadChanged
Two alternativesDock, Paperflite
against: Highspot, Seismic
Highspot, Seismic
Five alternativesAllego, Bigtincan, Guru, MindTickle, Showpad
against: CaptivateIQ
Showell
Four alternativesCalendly, HubSpot Sales Hub, Loom, Zoho CRM
against: Highspot, Seismic, Showpad
no first choiceagainst: Bigtincan, Highspot, Seismic
Claude Opus 4.8Highspot
Six alternativesAllego, Dock, Fluint, HubSpot Sales Hub, MindTickle, Showpad
against: Seismic
Highspot, ShowpadChanged
One alternativeHubSpot Sales Hub
against: Seismic
Highspot, Seismic
Six alternativesAllego, Dock, HubSpot Sales Hub, MindTickle, SalesHood, Showpad
HubSpot Sales Hub
Two alternativesClaap, Loom
against: Highspot, Seismic
no first choiceagainst: Highspot, Seismic, Showpad
GPT-6 AstraHighspot
Two alternativesMindTickle, Spekit
PaperfliteChanged
One alternativeHighspot
Highspot, Seismic
Five alternativesAllego, Mediafly, MindTickle, SalesHood, Showpad
HubSpot Sales Hub
Two alternativesBit.ai, SalesHood
no first choiceagainst: Bigtincan, Highspot, MindTickle, Seismic, Showpad
GPT-5.6 SolSalesHood
Four alternativesHighspot, HubSpot Sales Hub, MindTickle, Showpad
HighspotChanged
Five alternativesHubSpot Content Hub, HubSpot Sales Hub, SalesHood, Seismic, Showpad
Highspot, Seismic
Six alternativesAllego, Mediafly, MindTickle, SalesHood, Showpad, Spekit
HubSpot Sales Hub
Two alternativesPipedrive, Zoho CRM
against: Highspot, Seismic, Showpad
no first choice
One alternativeSalesforce Sales Programs
against: Bigtincan, Highspot, Seismic, Showpad
against: Bigtincan, Brainshark, Drift, Guru, Highspot, MindTickle, Salesforce Sales Programs, Seismic, Showpad, Spekit
Gemini 3.1 ProHighspot, Showpad
Two alternativesMindTickle, Seismic
HighspotChanged
Three alternativesDocSend, Paperflite, Showpad
against: Seismic
Seismic, Showpad
Three alternativesMediafly, MindTickle, Spekit
HubSpot Sales Hub
Five alternativesGetAccept, Notion, Peony, Qwilr, Trumpet
against: Highspot, MindTickle, Seismic
Showpad
Four alternativesAllego, Gong Enable, MindTickle, Spekit
against: Seismic
against: Bigtincan, Brainshark, Highspot, Seismic, Showpad
Perplexity Sonar ProSalesHood
Three alternativesDock, MindTickle, Spekit
HighspotChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Content Hub, HubSpot Sales Hub
against: Seismic
no first choiceHubSpot Sales Hub
Four alternativesDock, Freshsales, Guru, Pipedrive
against: Highspot, MindTickle, Seismic
no first choiceagainst: Bigtincan, Highspot, Seismic, Showpad, Storydoc
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Thirty-six rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 19:28yes3957 s
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 19:30yes2353 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:31yes629 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:33yes437 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:04no024 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 19:30yes206 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 19:35yes2859 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 19:36no017 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:37yes426 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:39yes327 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:05no025 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 19:36yes204 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 19:41yes3762 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 19:44yes2858 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:46yes849 s
ComparativeGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:48yes1259 s
ComparativeGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:07yes1852 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-10 00:37yes208 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 19:51yes2845 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 19:52yes3841 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:54yes529 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:55yes427 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:09yes1135 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 19:52yes204 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 19:58yes4174 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 19:59no024 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 20:01yes543 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 20:03yes667 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:12yes12111 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 19:59yes209 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 20:07yes40156 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 20:09yes3758 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 20:12yes633 s
Negative framingGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 20:14yes758 s
Negative framingGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:14yes534 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 20:10yes208 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Gong read as Gong Enable
HubSpot read as HubSpot Sales Hub
Salesforce read as Salesforce Sales Programs
Unresolved, counted raw
None awaiting human review.
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← DialersSales engagement →