September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published . The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index › GTM › Partner and channel › Referrals · September 2026 Edition

Referral and partner programs

Asked as “referral program software”, and as “partner ecosystem and referral tracking tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 23 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Referral Rock 22%
30PartnerStack22Referral Rock09GoAffPro39others

30% of first choices, contested.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01PartnerStack30%14%14endorsed leadernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 30% now.
02Referral Rock22%13%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 22% now.
03ReferralCandy9%44%16criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 9% now.
04Referral Factory4%17%12accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
05Viral Loops0%10%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 12 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01PartnerStack30%
02Referral Rock22%
03ReferralCandy9%
04Referral Factory4%
05Viral Loops0%

What they warned about

One of six models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol and Perplexity Sonar Pro changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ReferralCandy
44%
7 of 16 labels negative · 5 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Tools built specifically for retail (like ReferralCandy or Friendbuy) will generally fall short for your needs.” Gemini 3.1 Pro, direct prompt
Friendbuy
33%
3 of 9 labels negative · 3 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Tools built specifically for retail (like ReferralCandy or Friendbuy) will generally fall short for your needs.” Gemini 3.1 Pro, direct prompt
PartnerStack
14%
2 of 14 labels negative · 2 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise advocate platforms like Influitive or heavy partner-management tools like PartnerStack” Gemini 3.1 Pro, negative prompt
Ambassador
100%
2 of 2 labels negative · 2 of 6 models
“Ambassador ... underwent a sudden and messy ownership change/shutdown ... history warrants caution” Gemini 3.1 Pro, negative prompt

What they cite

Six of the six models returned a source list in this edition: six return the pages they cited.

Sites the answers cite

33 of 36 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 6 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 611 links across 230 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 36 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · ReferralCandy13 answers · 21 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Tremendous13 answers · 13 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Referral Rock12 answers · 17 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Capterra10 answers · 21 citations · 4 models
9 answers · 18 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Extole9 answers · 14 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Cello8 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 5 models
vendor site · PartnerStack7 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Moosend7 answers · 7 citations · 3 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best referral program software”, “referral program software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
PartnerStack partnerstack.com30%4014,4006827,49516
Referral Rock referralrock.com22%2227201018,59912
Rewardful rewardful.com9%1051,600133,6454,37822
UpPromote uppromote.com9%531,6004810,6460
GoAffPro goaffpro.com9%92,400413,8588
ReferralCandy referralcandy.com9%188590318,870286
Referral Factory referral-factory.com4%15748025,11531
Cello cello.so4%42165,00028,0813,1913
Smile.io smile.io4%108260268,962$1,46812
Crossbeam crossbeam.com0%885,400974,2563

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 10 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (extole.com, referral-factory.com, referralcandy.com, referralrock.com, tremendous.com). The first result for “best referral program software” is referral-factory.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best referral program software for a mid-market B2B software company?”Paraphrase“Which partner ecosystem and referral tracking tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B software company?”Comparative“What are the top referral program tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best referral program software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a referral program software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which referral program tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5Referral Factory, Referral Rock
One alternativeCello
against: PartnerStack
PartnerStackChanged
Three alternativesChannelscaler, Crossbeam, Impartner PRM
no first choice
Four alternativesFirstPromoter, Referral Rock, Rewardful, Tapfiliate
against: Extole, GrowSurf, ReferralCandy
ReferralCandy, Rewardful
Three alternativesReferral Factory, Tapfiliate, Viral Loops
against: Talkable
no first choiceagainst: Refersion
Claude Opus 4.8Cello, Referral Rock
Three alternativesIntrow, Partnero, Referral Factory
PartnerStackChanged
Three alternativesChannelscaler, Crossbeam, Kiflo PRM
against: impact.com
ReferralCandy
Seven alternativesCello, Friendbuy, Prefinery, Referral Factory, Referral Rock, Viral Loops, Yotpo Loyalty & Referrals
GoAffPro, UpPromote
Four alternativesAmbassadorFlow, GrowthHero, ReferralCandy, Rivo
against: Referral Rock
no first choiceagainst: Friendbuy, GrowSurf, Referral Rock, ReferralCandy
GPT-6 AstraReferral Rock
Three alternativesCello, PartnerStack, impact.com Advocate
PartnerStackChanged
Two alternativesChanneltivity, Crossbeam
no first choice
Nine alternativesFriendbuy, GrowSurf, Mention Me, Referral Factory, Referral Rock, ReferralCandy, Smile.io, Viral Loops, impact.com Advocate
against: SaaSquatch
Rewardful, Smile.io
One alternativeReferralHero
against: ReferralCandy
no first choiceagainst: Friendbuy, Referral Factory, ReferralCandy, Smile.io
GPT-5.6 SolReferral Rock
Two alternativesCello, PartnerStack
against: Ambassador, impact.com Advocate
PartnerStackChanged
Three alternativesCrossbeam, Kiflo PRM, impact.com
ReferralCandy
Ten alternativesFirstPromoter, Friendbuy, Mention Me, Referral Factory, Referral Rock, Rewardful, Smile.io, Viral Loops, Yotpo Loyalty & Referrals, impact.com Advocate
GoAffPro
Five alternativesBON Loyalty, Referralful, Rewardful, Viral Loops, WC Affiliate
no first choiceagainst: FirstPromoter, ReferralCandy, Rewardful, Viral Loops
Gemini 3.1 ProPartnerStack
Four alternativesFirstPromoter, Referral Rock, Rewardful, SaaSquatch
against: Friendbuy, ReferralCandy
PartnerStackHeld
Five alternativesChannelscaler, Channeltivity, Crossbeam, FirstPromoter, impact.com
no first choice
Eleven alternativesCello, FirstPromoter, Friendbuy, PartnerStack, Referral Rock, ReferralCandy, ReferralHero, Rewardful, Smile.io, Viral Loops, Yotpo Loyalty & Referrals
UpPromote
Seven alternativesBixGrow, Blitz Rocket, Endorsely, FirstPromoter, ReferralCandy, Rewardful, Viral Loops
no first choiceagainst: Ambassador, Influitive, Kickbooster, PartnerStack, ReferralCandy, Smile.io, Yotpo Loyalty & Referrals
Perplexity Sonar ProReferral Rock
Two alternativesPartnerStack, Referral Factory
PartnerStackChanged
Two alternativesCrossbeam, PartnerTap
no first choiceReferralCandy
Three alternativesInviteBox, LinkJolt, Partnero
against: Referral Factory
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Thirty-six rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 20:29yes4164 s
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 20:30yes3248 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 20:32yes635 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 20:34yes442 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:30yes1134 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-10 00:37yes204 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 20:36yes3952 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 20:37yes3454 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 20:39yes427 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 20:40yes528 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:32yes332 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 20:38yes206 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 20:42yes4067 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 20:44yes3953 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 20:47yes946 s
ComparativeGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 20:49yes1146 s
ComparativeGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 18:45yes1034 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 20:45yes207 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 20:51yes3954 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 20:59yes38420 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 21:00yes424 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 21:01yes627 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 18:46yes1031 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 20:59yes207 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 21:03no041 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 21:04no016 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 21:06yes539 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 21:07yes652 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 18:47no026 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 21:04yes207 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 21:09yes4244 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 21:16yes36330 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 21:17yes526 s
Negative framingGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 21:19yes542 s
Negative framingGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 18:49yes729 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 21:16yes208 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Firstbird read as Radancy Firstbird
Impartner read as Impartner PRM
Kiflo read as Kiflo PRM
Yotpo read as Yotpo Loyalty & Referrals
ZINFI read as ZINFI Unified Partner Management
Unresolved, counted raw
None awaiting human review.
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← PRMABM →