Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Financial reporting › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Financial reporting and dashboards for small business buyers
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Wave 15%
30QuickBooks Online15Wave13Xero Analytics43others
30% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.QuickBooks Online held the lead, +4 points on 26%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Sage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketSage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01QuickBooks Online30%13%55accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.26% → 30%
QuickBooks Online30%13%55accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.26% → 30%02
Wave15%0%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 17% → 15%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 15%
Wave15%0%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 17% → 15%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 15%03
Xero Analytics13%0%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 13%
Xero Analytics13%0%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 13%04
Zoho Books13%0%22accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 13%
Zoho Books13%0%22accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 13%05
Fathom9%7%14accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 16% → 9%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.16% → 9%
Fathom9%7%14accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 16% → 9%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.16% → 9%06
Zoho Analytics7%10%30accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
Zoho Analytics7%10%30accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%07
FreshBooks6%15%13accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
FreshBooks6%15%13accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Tableau0%58%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tableau0%58%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10Microsoft Power BI0%28%29criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Databox0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Databox0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs ProphixSage Intacct vs Xero AnalyticsSage Intacct vs Microsoft Power BISage Intacct vs CubeWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs DatarailsWave vs ProphixWave vs Xero AnalyticsWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs CubeZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs ProphixZoho Books vs Xero AnalyticsZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs CubeDatarails vs ProphixDatarails vs Xero AnalyticsDatarails vs Microsoft Power BIDatarails vs CubeProphix vs Xero AnalyticsProphix vs Microsoft Power BIProphix vs CubeXero Analytics vs Microsoft Power BIXero Analytics vs CubeMicrosoft Power BI vs Cube
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809M10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01QuickBooks Online30%
QuickBooks Online30%02Wave15%
Wave15%03Xero Analytics13%
Xero Analytics13%04Zoho Books13%
Zoho Books13%05Fathom9%
Fathom9%06Zoho Analytics7%
Zoho Analytics7%07FreshBooks6%
FreshBooks6%08Looker Studio0%
Looker Studio0%09Databox0%
Databox0%10Microsoft Power BI0%
11Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tableau58%
11 of 19 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Designed for large organizations with dedicated data teams. Steep learning curve, high cost, and unnecessary complexity for small businesses.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Microsoft Power BI
28%
8 of 29 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Small businesses need fast analytics without the heavy setup of tools like Tableau or Power BI.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
QuickBooks Online13%
7 of 55 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Common complaints about: QuickBooks Enterprise, FreshBooks, and similar platforms where basic reporting requires extensive setup and training.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Domo100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Repeatedly cited in reviews for high cost and poor customer support.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 703 links across 216 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Capterra38 answers · 69 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 48 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 26 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FreshBooks17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Maxio11 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zoho10 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Basedash10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Fuelfinance10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
22 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja QuickBooks Online 30% | 30% | 692 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | 253 company | |||
| Wave waveapps.com | 15% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| Xero xero.com Xero Analytics 13% | 13% | 55 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 company | $500 | 119 | 2 |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 13% | 13% | 367 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 9% | 190 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Analytics 7% | 7% | 53 | 2,900 | 23 | ||||
| FreshBooks freshbooks.com | 6% | 304 | 40,500 | 389 | 305,801 | $221 | 113 | |
| QuickBooks parent site QuickBooks Dashboard 4% | 4% | 2 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | ||||
| Maxio maxio.com | 2% | 151 | 2,400 | 49 | 32,891 | $518 | 59 | |
| LivePlan liveplan.com | 2% | 54 | 4,400 | 95 | 216,928 | 32 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (quickbooks.intuit.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top reporting tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5FreshBooksno first choiceChangedDatabox, Looker StudioWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Domo, Geckoboard, Looker Studio, Zoho Analytics
Five alternatives
Autymate, QuickBooks Online, Wave, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
DashThis, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero Analytics, Zoho AnalyticsGPT-5.4 miniFathom, QuickBooks Onlineagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctQuickBooks OnlineChangedagainst: MosaicMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Looker, Looker Studio, ModeZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cube, LiveFlow, Xero AnalyticsFour alternatives
Fathom, Float, Syft Analytics, Xero AnalyticsThree alternatives
Metabase, Redash, TableauThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Wave, Xero AnalyticsGemini 3.5 FlashQuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsFathomChangedLooker Studioagainst: AirtableWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, Full Enterprise Looker, Grafana, IBM Cognos Analytics, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, Oracle Analytics Server, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Crystal Reports
Five alternatives
Clockwork.ai, Fathom, LiveFlow, Maxio, Syft AnalyticsSix alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Finmark, Float, Jirav, LiveFlowFour alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIFour alternatives
Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Patriot Software, Syft AnalyticsSeven alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Jirav, LiveFlow, Mosaic, Syft AnalyticsPerplexity SonarQuickBooks OnlineZoho AnalyticsChangedno first choiceZoho Booksagainst: Fathom, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Three alternatives
Fathom, Maxio, Xero AnalyticsFour alternatives
Looker Studio, Maxio, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks OnlineEight alternatives
Asana, ClickUp, Coupler.io, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Monday.com, Teamwork.com, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Wave, Xero AnalyticsGrok 4.20MaxioQuickBooks OnlineChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, TableauWaveagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choiceagainst: Board, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, QlikView, SAP BusinessObjects, Sisense, Syft Analytics, Tableau
Three alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Rillet, Xero AnalyticsThree alternatives
Databox, Microsoft Power BI, Xero AnalyticsThree alternatives
ClickUp, Monday.com, SmartsheetTwo alternatives
Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsMistral SmallFreshBooks, Xero Analyticsno first choiceChangedGoogle Sheets, Looker Studio, Microsoft Excelagainst: ClickUp, Google Analytics, SmartsheetZoho Analyticsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BQE CORE Suite, QuickBooks OnlineFour alternatives
Databox, Tableau, Whatagraph, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksDeepSeek V4 FlashQuickBooks Onlineagainst: Sage IntacctFathomChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: TableauWaveagainst: QuickBooks OnlineFathom, QuickBooks Online, Xero Analyticsagainst: FreshBooks, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Sisense, Tableau
Three alternatives
FreshBooks, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Databox, LiveFlow, QuickBooks OnlineTwo alternatives
Databox, MetabaseTwo alternatives
Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksOne alternative
Microsoft Power BILlama 4 Maverickno first choiceQuickBooks DashboardChangedno first choiceFreshBooksno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
FineBI, Microsoft Power BI, Xero Analytics, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsQwen 3.7 FlashQuickBooks Online, Xero Analyticsagainst: Sage IntacctQuickBooks OnlineChangedLooker StudioQuickBooks Online, Waveno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Oracle, Qlik Sense, SAP, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Xero Analytics, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Geckoboard, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Zoho BooksKimi K2Xero AnalyticsLivePlanChangedagainst: Futrli, Microsoft Power BI, TableauZoho Analyticsagainst: Asana, ClickUp, Monday.com, WrikeWave, Zoho Booksagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choiceagainst: AgencyAnalytics, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau
Three alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Zoho BooksFive alternatives
Chaser, InvoiceSherpa, Melio, QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsFive alternatives
Better Reports, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, TableauTwo alternatives
Xero Analytics, ZipBooksGLM 4.7 FlashXQuickBooks OnlineZoho AnalyticsChangedagainst: Microsoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: DomoWaveagainst: Sage 50no first choiceagainst: Adobe Acrobat Pro, HubSpot, Marketo Engage, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Tableau
Three alternatives
Sage 50, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Databox, QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsEleven alternatives
Asana, ClickUp, Databox, Datapine, Klipfolio, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Monday.com, Tableau, Whatagraph, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksMiniMax M2.5QuickBooks OnlineQuickBooks Dashboard, Xero AnalyticsChangedClickUpQuickBooks Online, Xero Analyticsno first choiceagainst: AgencyAnalytics, FreshBooks, Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition, QuickBooks Online, SAP
Four alternatives
FreshBooks, Sage Intacct, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIFive alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Monday.com, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
FreeAgent, Zoho BooksGPT-6 LunaQuickBooks OnlineFathomChangedLooker Studioagainst: TableauZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fathom, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Chaser, QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsFour alternatives
Databox, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
WaveMuse Glimmer 30BQuickBooks OnlineQuickBooks Online, Zoho AnalyticsChangedno first choiceWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Domo, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Mode, Prophix, QuickBooks Online, SurePayroll, Tableau, ThoughtSpot, Zoho Analytics
Four alternatives
FreshBooks, Maxio, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
Databox, Xero AnalyticsFour alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero AnalyticsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 21 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 8 | 121 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:41 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 20 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 16 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:48 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 20 | 93 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 6 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 19 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 10 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:38 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:18 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 18 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 23 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (formerly Data Studio) read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Prophix One read as Prophix
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Free read as QuickBooks Online
Sage 50 Accounting read as Sage 50
Syft read as Syft Analytics
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Xero read as Xero Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Acrobat Pro
Airtable reporting
Autymate
BQE CORE Suite
Datapad
Full Enterprise Looker (Google Cloud)
Lucen
Marketo Engage
Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS)
Oracle Analytics Server
Preset.io
QlikView
Reportei
Tableau Cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.