Financial reporting and dashboards
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Wave 13%
15Sage Intacct13Wave11Zoho Books61others
15% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Sage Intacct held the lead, −18 points on 33%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Sage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Sage Intacct15%0%20accepted challenger▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.33% → 15%
Sage Intacct15%0%20accepted challenger▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.33% → 15%02
Wave13%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 13%
Wave13%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 17% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 13%03
Zoho Books11%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%
Zoho Books11%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%04
Datarails9%0%22accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
Datarails9%0%22accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%05
Prophix7%0%14accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
Prophix7%0%14accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%06
Xero Analytics6%12%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Xero Analytics6%12%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%07Microsoft Power BI4%14%35accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
08
Cube4%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Cube4%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%09
Oracle NetSuite4%12%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Oracle NetSuite4%12%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%10
Workday Adaptive Planning4%14%14accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%14%14accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%11QuickBooks Online2%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
QuickBooks Online2%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%12
Zoho Analytics2%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Zoho Analytics2%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%13
Planful2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Planful2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
18
Tableau0%32%25criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Tableau0%32%25criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%16
Looker Lab in the set0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%17
Qlik Sense0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qlik Sense0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Vena0%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Vena0%0%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%15
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs ProphixSage Intacct vs Xero AnalyticsSage Intacct vs Microsoft Power BISage Intacct vs CubeWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs DatarailsWave vs ProphixWave vs Xero AnalyticsWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs CubeZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs ProphixZoho Books vs Xero AnalyticsZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs CubeDatarails vs ProphixDatarails vs Xero AnalyticsDatarails vs Microsoft Power BIDatarails vs CubeProphix vs Xero AnalyticsProphix vs Microsoft Power BIProphix vs CubeXero Analytics vs Microsoft Power BIXero Analytics vs CubeMicrosoft Power BI vs Cube
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506M07
0809101112131415161718Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Sage Intacct15%
Sage Intacct15%02Wave13%
Wave13%03Zoho Books11%
Zoho Books11%04Datarails9%
Datarails9%05Prophix7%
Prophix7%06Xero Analytics6%
Xero Analytics6%07Microsoft Power BI4%
08Cube4%
Cube4%09Oracle NetSuite4%
Oracle NetSuite4%10Workday Adaptive Planning4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%11QuickBooks Online2%
QuickBooks Online2%12Zoho Analytics2%
Zoho Analytics2%13Planful2%
Planful2%14Vena0%
Vena0%15Looker Studio0%
Looker Studio0%16Looker0%
Looker0%17Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%18Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tableau32%
8 of 25 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Steer clear of enterprise-heavy tools like Anaplan or Tableau unless you have dedicated data analysts” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Microsoft Power BI
14%
5 of 35 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Drawback: Requires SQL knowledge and data engineering support to build and maintain financial models” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
SQL Server Reporting Services
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“legacy code-heavy reporting engines are often to be avoided” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Oracle Hyperion100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Enterprise tools (e.g., full Oracle/Hyperion or Workday) may be overkill for a 500-person company in terms of cost and complexity.” Kimi K2, scale prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
68 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 680 links across 250 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
22 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra21 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Simetrik14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · GetApp11 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FreshBooks11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Datarails10 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Prophix10 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Databox10 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FineBI9 answers · 10 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
14 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 9 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 5 models
7 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 15% | 15% | 500 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 | |
| Wave waveapps.com | 13% | 363 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 11% | 11% | 367 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Datarails datarails.com | 9% | 374 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | |
| Prophix prophix.com | 7% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | 1 |
| Xero xero.com Xero Analytics 6% | 6% | 55 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 company | $500 | 119 | 2 |
| Databox databox.com | 6% | 110 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 | ||
| Microsoft Power BI | 4% | 14,800 | 515 | |||||
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 4% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | ||
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 4% | 4% | 542 | 450,000 | 66,611 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (prophix.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Sage IntacctDatarailsChangedno first choiceWaveno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Datarails, Planful, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Microsoft Power BI, Prophix, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksGPT-5.4 miniSage IntacctAbacum, DatarailsChangedMicrosoft Power BIZoho Booksagainst: FreshBooks, Xero Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Power Query, SQL Server Reporting Services
Four alternatives
Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaOne alternative
AnaplanSeven alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Looker Studio, MicroStrategy, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, WaveGemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, Pigmentagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningMosaicChangedagainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIWave, Zoho Booksagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Excel/Google Sheets, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCagainst: BIRT, Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Jaspersoft, Looker, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Analytics, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Four alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, PigmentSix alternatives
Apache Superset, Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Qlik Sense, TableauSeven alternatives
Google Sheets, LivePlan, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI Desktop, Syft Analytics, Xero Analytics, ZipBooksSix alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, VenaPerplexity SonarSage IntacctMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: ClickUp, Google Analytics, Teamwork.comZoho Booksagainst: Fathom, Jiravno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Limelight, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
Cube, Fathom, Maxio, Mosaic, Sigma ComputingTen alternatives
DashThis, Databox, Fathom, Jirav, Looker, Looker Studio, QuickBooks Online, Syft Analytics, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, WaveGrok 4.20Sage Intacctagainst: Oracle NetSuiteCubeChangedagainst: Anaplan, TableauMicrosoft Power BIXero Analytics, Zoho Booksagainst: Intacct, Oracle NetSuite, Sage 50, Spotlight Reportingno first choiceagainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BI, QuickSight, Sigma Computing, Tableau
Two alternatives
Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaFour alternatives
Fathom, Microsoft Power BI, Prophix, QuickBooks OnlineFive alternatives
Domo, Looker Studio, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, WaveOne alternative
Oracle NetSuiteMistral SmallOracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctDataboxChangedno first choiceQuickBooks Online, Xero Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperionnothing named
Two alternatives
Datarails, FathomFour alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Vena, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Spotlight Reporting, Zoho BooksDeepSeek V4 FlashSage IntacctFathom, Microsoft Power BIChangedagainst: Domo, TableauMicrosoft Power BIWave, Zoho Booksagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Databox, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning, Zoho AnalyticsFive alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpot, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Xero AnalyticsLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDatabox, Datarails, Fairview, ProphixChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Remedy, Service Now
Qwen 3.7 FlashSage IntacctDataboxChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: DomoXero Analyticsno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks Online, Xero Analyticsagainst: FineReport, HubSpot reporting, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Salesforce Report Builder, Tableau
Five alternatives
Datarails, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Simetrik, VenaFive alternatives
Cube, Microsoft Power BI, Pigment, Prophix, VenaThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Syft Analytics, Zoho Books / Zoho AnalyticsKimi K2Sage IntacctPlanful, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceWaveno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Hyperion, Tableau, Workdayagainst: Fivetran, Google Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP Business Objects / Crystal Reports, Smartsheet, Tableau
Two alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Microsoft Power BI, VenaFive alternatives
Akaunting, FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksEight alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, FloQast, Jirav, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Spotlight ReportingGLM 4.7 FlashXOracle NetSuiteProphixChangedMicrosoft Power BIWaveagainst: Akaunting, FreshBooks, GnuCashno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
Datarails, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Databox, Microsoft Power BISix alternatives
Amazon QuickSight, Domo, Looker, Metabase, Qlik Cloud Analytics, TableauFive alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Syft Analytics, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksMiniMax M2.5DatarailsZoho AnalyticsChangedno first choiceWaveagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Centage, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Fuelfinance, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks OnlineThree alternatives
FreshBooks, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksGPT-6 LunaProphixCubeChangedMicrosoft Power BIZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Planful, Sage Intacct, VenaThree alternatives
Datarails, Microsoft Power BI, MosaicFive alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Qlik Cloud Analytics, TableauOne alternative
WaveMuse Glimmer 30BProphixDatarails, MaxioChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauWaveno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Maxio, Planful, Sage IntacctFive alternatives
Cube, Databox, Grid, MyReport, VenaOne alternative
LookerFive alternatives
Akaunting, QuickBooks Online, Quicken Business & Personal, Xero Analytics, Zoho BooksBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 12 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 15 | 87 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:34 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:09 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 5 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 15 | 97 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:11 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:21 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 79 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:04 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 19 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle) read as Oracle NetSuite
Prophix One read as Prophix
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Xero read as Xero Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Azure DevOps reporting
BQE CORE Suite
Cube.js
Grow
LibreOffice Base
Microsoft Power BI Desktop
MyReport
Pry Financials
Qlik Cloud Analytics
QuickSight
Remedy
SAP Business Objects / Crystal Reports
Salesforce Report Builder
Service Now
Tableau Cloud
Tremor
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.