FP&A platforms
Asked as “FP&A software”, and as “financial planning and analysis platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Prophix 14%
19Pigment14Prophix12Cube54others
19% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Pigment leads at 19%, replacing Planful, which led at 20% and stands at 7% now: 12 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cube24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Pigment19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Anaplan49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Cube24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketPigment19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.This pageEnterpriseAnaplan49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Pigment19%14%44accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 4% → 19%, +15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.4% → 19%
Pigment19%14%44accepted challenger▲+15Since October 2026: 4% → 19%, +15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.4% → 19%02
Prophix14%3%34accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 0% → 14%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.0% → 14%
Prophix14%3%34accepted challenger▲+14Since October 2026: 0% → 14%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.0% → 14%03Cube12%11%53accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%
Cube12%11%53accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%04
Aleph9%0%25accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%
Aleph9%0%25accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%05
Planful7%15%54accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 20% → 7%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.20% → 7%
Planful7%15%54accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 20% → 7%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.20% → 7%06
Workday Adaptive Planning7%35%62criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%
Workday Adaptive Planning7%35%62criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%07
Vena5%22%49accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.13% → 5%
Vena5%22%49accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.13% → 5%08
Jirav2%19%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Jirav2%19%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Anaplan0%56%59criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Anaplan0%56%59criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
OneStream0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneStream0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Datarails0%12%52accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Datarails0%12%52accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Board0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Board0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Centage0%0%14accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Centage0%0%14accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Pigment vs PlanfulPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs VenaPigment vs JiravProphix vs CubeProphix vs AlephProphix vs PlanfulProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs VenaProphix vs JiravCube vs AlephCube vs PlanfulCube vs Workday Adaptive PlanningCube vs VenaCube vs JiravAleph vs PlanfulAleph vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAleph vs VenaAleph vs JiravPlanful vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful vs VenaPlanful vs JiravWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JiravVena vs Jirav
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Pigment19%
Pigment19%02Prophix14%
Prophix14%03Cube12%
Cube12%04Aleph9%
Aleph9%05Planful7%
Planful7%06Workday Adaptive Planning7%
Workday Adaptive Planning7%07Vena5%
Vena5%08Jirav2%
Jirav2%09Datarails0%
Datarails0%10Centage0%
Centage0%11Board0%
Board0%12OneStream0%
OneStream0%13Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM0%14Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan56%
33 of 59 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Red flag: Enterprise platforms (Anaplan, Oracle EPM) often assume a 5+ person dedicated FP&A staff” Kimi K2, scale prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning35%
22 of 62 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid the mid-market "contact us" vendors (Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Pigment, Planful)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Vena22%
11 of 49 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Extremely slow performance (e.g., single-cell updates taking 20+ minutes)... many call it "the worst decision"” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Planful15%
8 of 54 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“60% of FP&A professionals expressed criticism about Planful. Users report that "the planning feature was almost impossible to use".” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 771 links across 161 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
37 answers · 66 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Prophix32 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 56 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Centage20 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Board15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Datarails12 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best fp&a software”, “fp&a platforms”, “fp&a software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pigment pigment.com | 19% | 198 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | ||
| Prophix prophix.com | 14% | 249 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | 2 |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 12% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Aleph getaleph.com | 9% | 92 | 18,100 | 1,663 | 7,310 | 0 | 3 | |
| Planful planful.com | 7% | 357 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 7% | 7% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | ||
| Vena venasolutions.com | 5% | 404 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | |
| PlanGuru planguru.com | 5% | 43 | ||||||
| Mosaic mosaic.tech | 4% | 45 | 165,000 | 34,052 | 27 | |||
| Excel | 4% | 823,000 | 391,255 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 8 of them are among the sites the models cited here (centage.com, cfoshortlist.com, corporatefinanceinstitute.com, cubesoftware.com, g2.com, getaleph.com, golimelight.com, prophix.com). The first result for “best fp&a software” is irisfinance.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best FP&A software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which financial planning and analysis platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top FP&A platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best FP&A software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a FP&A software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which FP&A platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Planfulno first choiceChangedPigmentJiravno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Oracle Essbase, Oracle NetSuite Planning & Budgeting, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Cube, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
Aleph, Anaplan, Datarails, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixFour alternatives
Aleph, Causal, Clockwork, DatarailsGPT-5.4 miniVenaPlanfulChangedno first choiceLiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Unit4 FP&A, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningEleven alternatives
Abacum, Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Aleph, Coefficient, Cube, MartusGemini 3.5 FlashAbacum, Mosaicagainst: AnaplanMosaic, PigmentChangedno first choiceFathomagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, SAP BPCagainst: Anaplan, Basic add-in tools that act strictly as reporting layers over Excel, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Cube, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, ProphixFive alternatives
Causal, Clockwork, Finmark, Jirav, LiveFlowEight alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningPerplexity SonarPigmentProphixChangedagainst: AnaplanAnaplan, BoardCubeagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Jirav, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena
Three alternatives
Aleph, Planful, ProphixFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, VenaNine alternatives
Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Centage, Datarails, JiravGrok 4.20Cubeagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedagainst: AnaplanAnaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics CloudCubeagainst: Anaplan, Jirav, Workday Adaptive PlanningProphixagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workiva, legacy SAP
Four alternatives
Centage, Maxio, Planful, VenaThree alternatives
Planful, Prophix, VenaSix alternatives
Board, Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, Planful, ProphixTwo alternatives
Google Sheets or Excel, PlanGuruTwo alternatives
Pigment, PlanfulMistral SmallPlanfulProphix, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedno first choiceCubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Vena
Two alternatives
Pigment, ProphixThree alternatives
Anaplan, Planful, VenaTwo alternatives
Fairview, Reach ReportingDeepSeek V4 FlashPigmentProphixChangedAnaplanPlanGuruagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, NetSuite Planning, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAPagainst: Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Jedox, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Aleph, ProphixSix alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, Drivetrain, Mosaic, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningEleven alternatives
Board, Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Enterprise Performance Management, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Cube, Fathom, Google Sheets or Excel, Jirav, Looker Studio, OnPlanLlama 4 MaverickAleph, Pigment, ProphixProphixChangedno first choiceCubeagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Vena
Three alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Aleph, Centage, Pigment, VenaThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningQwen 3.7 FlashPlanful, Workday Adaptive PlanningVenaChangedagainst: Anaplan, SAP BPCno first choiceagainst: Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningAlephagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Centage, Cube, VenaThree alternatives
Cube, Floatplane, PlanfulEight alternatives
Anaplan, Board, Causal, Cube, Datarails, PivotXL, Planful, VenaThree alternatives
Bob Finance, Fairview, PlanGuruSix alternatives
Centage, Cube, Cubesoftware, Pigment, Planful, ProphixKimi K2PigmentProphix, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedagainst: Anaplanno first choiceGoogle Sheets or Excel, PlanGuruagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Limelight, Pigment, Planful, QuickBooks, Sage, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Vena
Four alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Pigment, PlanfulFour alternatives
Centage, Jirav, Looker Studio, StrivenSeven alternatives
Aleph, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, ProphixGLM 4.7 FlashXPigmentAlephChangedagainst: AnaplanBoard, OneStreamExcel, Fairview, PlanGuruno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, EngineBI, IBM Planning Analytics, Jedox, LiveFlow, Phocas Software, Prophix Software, Talentia CPM, UTrakk, Unit4 FP&A, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Aleph, ProphixSix alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Budgyt, Cube, Datarails, Finokapi, ReadyRatiosMiniMax M2.5Aleph, PigmentPigmentChangedAnaplanPivotXLVenaagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Excel, Google Sheets, Host Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Prophix, VenaFour alternatives
Aleph, Centage, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Board, Causal, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Planful, VenaTwo alternatives
G-Accon, LiveFlowFour alternatives
Cube, Jirav, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-6 LunaPigmentPigmentHeldno first choiceExcel, Google Sheetsagainst: Clockwork, Jiravno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Adaptive from Workday, Planful, VenaTwo alternatives
Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningNine alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
FathomMuse Glimmer 30BAleph, PigmentProphixChangedOracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle PBCSCubeno first choiceagainst: Abacum, Anaplan, Bob Finance, Jedox, OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, Planful, Talentia CPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Centage, Cube, Datarails, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
Aleph, Centage, Cube, Planful, VenaNine alternatives
Adaptive from Workday, Anaplan, Causal, Cube, Datarails, Limelight, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Adlega, Aleph, Clockwork, Datarails, Float, RunwayBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 14 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 57 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 15 | 120 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 16 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 9 | 92 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:14 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 9 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 15 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 12 | 176 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 13 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 23 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 21 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (Workday Adaptive Planning) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights (by Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive Insights by Workday read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Clockwork AI read as Clockwork
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Adam
Basic add-in tools that act strictly as reporting layers over Excel
Cascade
Claude or ChatGPT
Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini
Cubewise
EngineBI
Finokapi
Floatplane
Insightly
Martus
NetSuite Planning
ReadyRatios
SAP FP&A
UTrakk
Vareto
Vimaan
legacy SAP
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.