6 categories · RankedJirav
Jirav is FP&A and financial forecasting software for accounting firms and small and midsize businesses · jirav.com ↗
Strongest at small business. Thin evidence at enterprise: four labels.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Cube is first at 24%.
Pigment is first at 19%.
Anaplan is first at 49%.
Why models recommend it
“Jirav is an affordable entry point for small businesses ... making it a relatively cost-effective choice”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Cube or Jirav”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Driver-based three-statement forecasts, budgeting, and cash-runway analysis in a relatively accessible platform.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Jirav is the best pick for SMB finance teams that need a rolling 13-week cash forecast across multiple entities”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid buying dedicated financial-planning platforms such as Jirav, Fathom”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid overpaying for enterprise tools like Datarails or Jirav”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“FP&A platforms (e.g., Cube, Datarails, Jirav, Drivetrain, cfo.ai, Workday Adaptive Planning, Aleph) - may not be effective for 13-week cash flow forecasting.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Be careful with "from $50/month" Jirav pricing: the public plans are described as being for FP&A advisory practices”GPT-6 Luna · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Jirav, over the 166 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 108 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 89 | 9 | View → | |
| 89 | 7 | View → | |
| 80 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 59 | 11 | View → | |
| 58 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 29 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Jirav →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Jirav's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- Accounting Firms & Businesses; accounting firms and SMB's; accounting and CFO firms; small or medium business; small and midsize companies; modern accounting firms; VC-funded companies
- Price stated
- $100/month-$750/month
- Starting price
- 100
- Customers named
- Acuity, ClosedLoop.ai, Compass East, Creative Planning, Eide Bailly, Forvis, GrowthLab, arkona
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 148 of the 166 answers that named Jirav and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
352 of the 352 domain citations in answers naming Jirav came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 198 | 7 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 12 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 12 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Budget vs forecast whats the difference and why both matter comparison
- 2026-09-08What is fpa a complete guide to financial planning and analysis glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Financial modeling for startups from seed to series b blog
- 2026-08-27Cash flow kpis the metrics every cfo and advisor should monitor blog
- 2026-08-03Excel vs fpa software when its time to make the switch comparison
- 2026-07-14Jirav xero advanced forecasting for xero connected firms blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jirav.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.