FP&A platforms for small business buyers
Asked as “FP&A software”, and as “financial planning and analysis platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · Jirav 19%
24Cube19Jirav17Fathom41others
24% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Cube leads at 24%, replacing Fathom, which led at 25% and stands at 17% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cube24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageMid-market
Pigment19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Cube24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageMid-marketPigment19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Cube24%11%62accepted challenger▲+17Since October 2026: 7% → 24%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.7% → 24%
Cube24%11%62accepted challenger▲+17Since October 2026: 7% → 24%, +17 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.7% → 24%02
Jirav19%13%38accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%
Jirav19%13%38accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%03
Fathom17%8%38accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 25% → 17%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 17%
Fathom17%8%38accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 25% → 17%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.25% → 17%04
Datarails8%7%60accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%
Datarails8%7%60accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%05
Aleph5%0%23accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Aleph5%0%23accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%06
PlanGuru5%0%13accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
PlanGuru5%0%13accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%07
Clockwork3%8%13accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 3%
Clockwork3%8%13accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 3%08
LiveFlow2%6%18accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
LiveFlow2%6%18accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%09
Runway2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Runway2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
Mosaic2%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Mosaic2%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%11
Planful2%56%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Planful2%56%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17Anaplan0%87%38criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Anaplan0%87%38criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%16
Workday Adaptive Planning0%79%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Adaptive Planning0%79%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Vena0%44%27criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Vena0%44%27criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14Pigment0%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Pigment0%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Centage0%16%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Centage0%16%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Abacum0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Abacum0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Pigment vs PlanfulPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs VenaPigment vs JiravProphix vs CubeProphix vs AlephProphix vs PlanfulProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs VenaProphix vs JiravCube vs AlephCube vs PlanfulCube vs Workday Adaptive PlanningCube vs VenaCube vs JiravAleph vs PlanfulAleph vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAleph vs VenaAleph vs JiravPlanful vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful vs VenaPlanful vs JiravWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs JiravVena vs Jirav
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314151617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Cube24%
Cube24%02Jirav19%
Jirav19%03Fathom17%
Fathom17%04Datarails8%
Datarails8%05Aleph5%
Aleph5%06PlanGuru5%
PlanGuru5%07Clockwork3%
Clockwork3%08LiveFlow2%
LiveFlow2%09Runway2%
Runway2%10Mosaic2%
Mosaic2%11Planful2%
Planful2%12Centage0%
Centage0%13Abacum0%
Abacum0%14Pigment0%
Pigment0%15Vena0%
Vena0%16Workday Adaptive Planning0%
Workday Adaptive Planning0%17Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan87%
33 of 38 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 23 hard negative
“Tools to generally avoid at your current size: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, OneStream, Board (too heavy, expensive, and slow to implement).” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning79%
31 of 39 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 19 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-grade FP&A platforms: Platforms like Workday Adaptive Planning, Anaplan, or Vena are designed for large, complex organizations and may be too costly and complex for small businesses.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Vena44%
12 of 27 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-grade FP&A platforms: Platforms like Workday Adaptive Planning, Anaplan, or Vena are designed for large, complex organizations” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Heavy operational overhead, rigid structures, and steep learning curves.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 793 links across 147 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G245 answers · 73 citations · 13 models
37 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Datarails21 answers · 45 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Prophix21 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Centage21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fuelfinance17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
35 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best fp&a software”, “fp&a platforms”, “fp&a software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 24% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Jirav jirav.com | 19% | 148 | 720 | 15 | 3,780 | 2 | ||
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 17% | 190 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Datarails datarails.com | 8% | 374 | 6,600 | 134 | 18,964 | $16,697 | 107 | |
| Aleph getaleph.com | 5% | 92 | 18,100 | 1,663 | 7,310 | 0 | 3 | |
| PlanGuru planguru.com | 5% | 43 | ||||||
| Clockwork clockwork.ai | 3% | 24 | 27,100 | 7,178 | 463 | 4 | ||
| LiveFlow liveflow.com | 2% | 52 | 1,300 | 19 | 94,846 | 4 | ||
| Runway runway.com | 2% | 30 | 110,000 | 33,145 | 169,043 | 91 | ||
| Mosaic mosaic.tech | 2% | 45 | 165,000 | 34,052 | 27 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 9 of them are among the sites the models cited here (centage.com, cfoshortlist.com, corporatefinanceinstitute.com, cubesoftware.com, g2.com, getaleph.com, golimelight.com, prophix.com, thefinanceweekly.com). The first result for “best fp&a software” is irisfinance.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best FP&A software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which financial planning and analysis platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top FP&A platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best FP&A software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a FP&A software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which FP&A platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5JiravFreshBooks, XeroChangedDatarails, MosaicJiravno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Jirav, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Clockwork, Cube, DatarailsOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineThree alternatives
Cube, Jirav, VenaFour alternatives
Clockwork, Cube, Datarails, QuickBooks OnlineGPT-5.4 miniCubeagainst: PlanfulDatarailsChangedagainst: Planful, VenaDatarailsFathomno first choiceagainst: Workiva
Three alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, VenaOne alternative
FathomFive alternatives
Abacum, Cube, Planful, Prophix, RunwayTwo alternatives
Centage, DatarailsGemini 3.5 FlashJiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningJiravHeldCubeagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningClockwork, Fathomagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Jirav, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningCube, Mosaic, Runwayagainst: Anaplan, Board, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Six alternatives
Causal, Cube, Datarails, LiveFlow, Mosaic, Syft AnalyticsSix alternatives
Aleph, Clockwork, Cube, Fathom, Mosaic, RunwaySix alternatives
Aleph, Causal, Datarails, Jirav, LiveFlow, MosaicThree alternatives
Causal, Coefficient, LiveFlowFour alternatives
Causal, Jirav, LivePlan, SheetGoPerplexity SonarJiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningJiravHeldCube, Datarails, JiravCubeagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Connected spreadsheets or Aleph, Cube, Datarails, MosaicFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Mosaic, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Aleph, Limelight, RunwayThree alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, JiravGrok 4.20Cubeagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningJiravChangedagainst: Anaplan, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningCube, Jiravagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PigmentLiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Cube, IBM Planning Analytics, Workday Adaptive PlanningCube, Planfulagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Jedox, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Causal, Datarails, Fathom, VenaFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, LiveFlowThree alternatives
Datarails, Planful, VenaFive alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel, Row Zero, Xero or QuickBooks Online + Built-In ToolsSix alternatives
Abacum, Datarails, Fuelfinance, Limelight, Prophix, VenaMistral SmallFathomFuelfinance, JiravChangedCube, Datarails, LiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, FuelfinanceThree alternatives
Cube, Fathom, LiveFlowOne alternative
AlephThree alternatives
Centage, Datarails, FirmbaseDeepSeek V4 FlashCubeFathomChangedagainst: Anaplan, Centage, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: FathomFathomagainst: Anaplan, Centage, Jirav, LiveFlow, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Fathom, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, Fathom, FinmarkFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Jirav, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, RunwayOne alternative
PlanGuruFour alternatives
Aleph, Cube, Datarails, LimelightLlama 4 MaverickAlephFathomChangedAlephCubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Datarails, Pigment, RunwayThree alternatives
Centage, Clockwork, DatarailsTwo alternatives
Cube, DatarailsThree alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, RunwayQwen 3.7 FlashDatarails, FloatCubeChangedAleph, CubePlanGuruno first choiceagainst: NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Fathom, XplaneTwo alternatives
Fathom, LiveFlowThree alternatives
Abacum, Datarails, LiveFlowTwo alternatives
Fathom, RowsKimi K2Cube, Datarailsagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, PlanfulCube, FathomChangedFathom, Jiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanGuruagainst: Anaplan, Centage, Cube, Jirav, SAP, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, SAP, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Aleph, JiravTwo alternatives
Datarails, LiveFlowFive alternatives
Centage, Cube, Datarails, Fuelfinance, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Excel or Google Sheets, QuickBooks Online, XeroFour alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Jirav, LiveFlowGLM 4.7 FlashXFathomFathomHeldno first choicePlanGuruno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Fathom, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Cube, DatarailsTwo alternatives
Datarails, JiravSeven alternatives
Aleph, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Firmbase, LiveFlowFive alternatives
Adlega, Centage, Cube, Firmbase, RunwayMiniMax M2.5Aleph, DatarailsDatarails, JiravChangedCube, Datarailsagainst: VenaCube, Fairviewno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Cube, Fuelfinance, JiravThree alternatives
Cube, Fathom, SMPL.aiTwo alternatives
Centage, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Datarails, Google Sheets / Excel, PlanGuruGPT-6 LunaClockwork, Jiravagainst: CubeJiravChangedJiravExcel, Google Sheetsagainst: Clockworkno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Jirav, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
One alternative
FathomFour alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, MosaicTwo alternatives
Fathom, FloatThree alternatives
Clockwork, Cube, JiravMuse Glimmer 30BAlephFathomChangedAlephagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningCubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Centage, Cube, Datarails, JiravThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, FairviewSeven alternatives
Centage, Cube, Datarails, Fairview, Fathom, PlanGuru, RunwayFour alternatives
Aleph, Clockwork, Datarails, FairviewBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:05 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 24 | 122 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 17 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 22 | 69 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 20 | 70 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 9 | 49 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 25 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 11 | 169 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 12 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 17 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 19 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:26 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 18 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 22 | 76 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 10 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Clockwork AI read as Clockwork
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
VENA Solutions read as Vena
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
AI Assistant (Claude/GPT-4)
Connected spreadsheets or Aleph
Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel (with Add-Ins)
Profitual
SMPL.ai
SheetGo
Xero or QuickBooks Online + Built-In Tools
Xplane
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.