Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Financial modeling › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Financial modeling and scenario planning for small business buyers
Asked as “financial modeling software”, and as “scenario planning tool for finance”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Microsoft Excel 22%
22Google Sheets22Microsoft Excel10Jirav47others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Excel (22%) replaces Google Sheets (19% then, 22% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Microsoft Excel leads at 22%, replacing Google Sheets, which led at 19% and stands at 22% now: 0 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Excel22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Excel (22%) replaces Google Sheets (19% then, 22% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Excel19%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 14% → 19%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan59%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Microsoft Excel22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Excel (22%) replaces Google Sheets (19% then, 22% now), 0 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Excel19%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 14% → 19%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan59%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 56% → 59%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Excel22%3%30accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 14% → 22%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 22%
Microsoft Excel22%3%30accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 14% → 22%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.14% → 22%02
Google Sheets Lab in the set22%4%26accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 19% → 22%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.19% → 22%
Google Sheets Lab in the set22%4%26accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 19% → 22%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.19% → 22%03
Jirav10%27%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%
Jirav10%27%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 10% → 10%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 10%04
Fuelfinance8%0%20accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%
Fuelfinance8%0%20accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%05
LivePlan8%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%
LivePlan8%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%06
Causal8%0%12accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 8%
Causal8%0%12accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 8%07
Cube3%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%
Cube3%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%08
Finmark3%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%
Finmark3%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 3% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 3%09
PlanGuru2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
PlanGuru2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16Anaplan0%91%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Anaplan0%91%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Workday Adaptive Planning0%86%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Adaptive Planning0%86%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Oracle Hyperion0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Hyperion0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Vena0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Vena0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Datarails0%16%19accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Datarails0%16%19accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%10
Fathom0%0%15accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.12% → 0%
Fathom0%0%15accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.12% → 0%11
Float0%0%11accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
Float0%0%11accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Sheets is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models twelve times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Excel vs Workday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Excel vs Prophix OneMicrosoft Excel vs CubeMicrosoft Excel vs VenaDatarails vs Google SheetsDatarails vs PigmentDatarails vs Workday Adaptive PlanningDatarails vs Prophix OneDatarails vs CubeDatarails vs VenaGoogle Sheets vs PigmentGoogle Sheets vs Workday Adaptive PlanningGoogle Sheets vs Prophix OneGoogle Sheets vs CubeGoogle Sheets vs VenaPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs Prophix OnePigment vs CubePigment vs VenaWorkday Adaptive Planning vs Prophix OneWorkday Adaptive Planning vs CubeWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaProphix One vs CubeProphix One vs VenaCube vs Vena
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213141516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Excel22%
Microsoft Excel22%02Google Sheets22%
Google Sheets22%03Jirav10%
Jirav10%04Fuelfinance8%
Fuelfinance8%05LivePlan8%
LivePlan8%06Causal8%
Causal8%07Cube3%
Cube3%08Finmark3%
Finmark3%09PlanGuru2%
PlanGuru2%10Fathom0%
Fathom0%11Float0%
Float0%12Datarails0%
Datarails0%13Vena0%
Vena0%14Oracle Hyperion0%
Oracle Hyperion0%15Workday Adaptive Planning0%
Workday Adaptive Planning0%16Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan91%
21 of 23 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 18 hard negative
“Enterprise performance-management suites such as Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP BPC. They can involve opaque pricing, lengthy implementations” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning86%
19 of 22 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 17 hard negative
“What I'd avoid for a small B2B company - Enterprise platforms like Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Pigment, Planful, or OneStream” GPT-5.4 mini, direct prompt
Oracle Hyperion83%
10 of 12 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Enterprise performance-management suites such as Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP BPC.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
SAP BPC100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Enterprise performance-management suites such as Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP BPC.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 714 links across 243 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Fuelfinance29 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)20 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Datarails19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sourceforge17 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Centage10 answers · 10 citations · 9 models
9 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 5 models
vendor site · PlanGuru8 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
20 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 4 models
8 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial modeling software”, “financial modeling software”, “modeling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Excel microsoft.com Microsoft Excel 22%, Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets 3% | 25% | 148 | 135,000 | 4,387 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Google Sheets google.com | 22% | 112 | 3,350,000 | 53,730 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 | |
| Jirav jirav.com | 10% | 148 | 720 | 15 | 3,780 | 2 | ||
| Fuelfinance fuelfinance.me | 8% | 29 | ||||||
| LivePlan liveplan.com | 8% | 54 | 4,400 | 95 | 216,928 | 32 | ||
| Causal lucanet.com | 8% | 33 | 49,500 | 3,471 | 342 | |||
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 3% | 304 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 4 | |
| Finmark bill.com | 3% | 24 | 720 | 1 | 1,783,039 | $199,231 | 119 | |
| EasyFinancialModels easyfinancialmodels.com | 3% | 10 | ||||||
| Excel/Google Sheets | 3% | 2,016 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fathomhq.com). The first result for “best financial modeling software” is intl.finebi.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial modeling software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which scenario planning tool for finance would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top modeling tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial modeling software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial modeling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which modeling tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Excel/Google SheetsExcel/Google SheetsHeldagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningLivePlanLivePlanno first choiceagainst: Camunda, ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, SAP Signavio
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Float, LivePlanThree alternatives
BILL, Cube, ForecastrThree alternatives
Fathom, PlanGuru, XeroGPT-5.4 miniJiravagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningGoogle Sheets, Microsoft ExcelChangedno first choiceCausal, LiveFlowno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fathom, FloatThree alternatives
Abacum, Cube, DatarailsOne alternative
UpmetricsGemini 3.5 FlashCausalCausalHeldagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excelagainst: Datarails, Jirav, Mosaic, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningMosaicagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Clockwork, Cube, LiveFlow, Mosaic, RunwayThree alternatives
Clockwork, Cube, JiravSeven alternatives
Ben Murray's Standard Financial Plan, Causal, Christoph Janz's Financial Model, Clockwork, Fathom, LivePlan, Score.org Free TemplatesSix alternatives
Aleph, Causal, Cube, Jirav, Parallel, RunwayPerplexity SonarJiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningLivePlanChangedagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excelagainst: Jiravno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Cube, Drivetrain, Excel or Google Sheets, FathomTwo alternatives
Dryrun, FloatFive alternatives
BILL, Finmark, Float, QuickBooks, XeroGrok 4.20Microsoft Excelagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, Quantrix ModelerFuelfinanceChangedagainst: Centage Planning Maestrono first choiceMicrosoft Excelagainst: Anaplan, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Essbase, IBM, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Hyperion, Quantrix Modeler, SAP BPC, SAS, Tableau, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Causal, Jirav, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Float, Google Sheets, JiravFour alternatives
Causal, Dryrun, Google Sheets, JiravSix alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix One, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallCube, Google SheetsGoogle Sheets, Microsoft ExcelChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Excel or Google Sheetsno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Jirav, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Datarails, Finmark, Microsoft ExcelTwo alternatives
Fuelfinance, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Blox, Cube, FinmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashCausal, FinmarkJiravChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Excelagainst: Anaplan, Oracle, Workday Adaptive PlanningJiravagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Amplitude, Anaplan, CoreView, ER/Studio, Erwin Data Modeler, Full RiskLens, Microsoft 365 Lighthouse, Mixpanel, Oracle Hyperion, SAFE Security, SAP BPC, SAP PowerDesigner, Saviynt, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Fuelfinance, Jirav, PlanGuruTwo alternatives
Fathom, FloatFour alternatives
Causal, EasyFinancialModels, Finmark, PlanGuruSeven alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Fuelfinance, Limelight, Syft, VenaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceGoogle SheetsChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Jirav, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Cube, LivePlanQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft ExcelGoogle SheetsChangedLucidchart, SqlDBMLivePlanagainst: Anaplan, Tableauno first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAPagainst: Miro, Mural, Oracle NetSuite, PowerBI, SAP Business One, Siemens Teamcenter, Tableau
Eight alternatives
Agicap, ChartMogul, Fathom, Float, Flylines, Qube, Solvency, ThinknumThree alternatives
Cube, Float, JiravOne alternative
dbtThree alternatives
Compass AI, Excel/Google Sheets, MacabacusKimi K2Causal, Jiravagainst: DatarailsJiravChangedagainst: Google Sheets / ExcelLucidchartEasyFinancialModels, Google SheetsFinmark, Fuelfinanceagainst: Anaplan, Jirav, NetSuite, Oracle Hyperion, Pricefx, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning, Zilliant
Three alternatives
EasyFinancialModels, Excel/Google Sheets, FuelfinanceOne alternative
FathomFour alternatives
DbSchema, QuickDBD / dbdiagram.io, SqlDBM, dbtTwo alternatives
Microsoft Excel, PlanGuruThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Excel/Google SheetsGLM 4.7 FlashXFuelfinancePlanGuruChangedno first choiceEasyFinancialModels, Microsoft Excelno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Business Model Fiddle, ER/Studio, Erwin Data Modeler, Host Analytics, Jirav, Lean Monitor, Lean Stack, Microsoft Power BI, Mosaic, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, SAP PowerDesigner, Strategyzer, Tableau Creator, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Datarails, PlanGuru, UpmetricsFour alternatives
Fuelfinance, Google Sheets, LivePlan, Microsoft ExcelThree alternatives
Datarails, Forevana, Invest for ExcelMiniMax M2.5Fuelfinance, LivePlanGoogle Sheets, Microsoft ExcelChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Excel or Google Sheetsno first choiceagainst: Akeneo, Anaplan, Attentive, Erwin Data Modeler, OpenMage, Pimcore
Three alternatives
Compass AI, Finmark, Microsoft ExcelTwo alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, FuelfinanceFour alternatives
Financial Modeling Prep, Fuelfinance, Looker Studio, PlanGuruGPT-6 LunaGoogle Sheets, Microsoft ExcelLivePlanChangedno first choiceGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excelno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fathom, JiravOne alternative
FloatOne alternative
LivePlanMuse Glimmer 30BFuelfinanceGoogle SheetsChangedagainst: Clockworkno first choiceGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excelagainst: Cube, Datarails, JiravCubeagainst: Adobe Analytics, Anaplan, Google Analytics, Jirav, OneStream, Oracle Essbase, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle NetSuite, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, RiskLens, SAFE Security, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Sage Intacct, Vendavo, Workday Adaptive Planning, Zilliant
Six alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Finmark, Google Sheets, LivePlan, Microsoft ExcelThree alternatives
Cash Flow Frog, Microsoft Excel, PlanGuruFive alternatives
BizPlanBuilder, Compass AI, EasyFinancialModels, Finmark, LivePlanSeven alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Fuelfinance, Futrli, Microsoft Excel, Pry, VenaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:21 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 8 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 13 | 120 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:00 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 7 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 18 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:12 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:57 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:59 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 1 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:59 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:22 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 13 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:11 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 23 | 154 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:16 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Clockwork AI read as Clockwork
Clockwork.ai read as Clockwork
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Visio read as Visio
Prophix read as Prophix One
Quantrix read as Quantrix Modeler
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Adaptiva
Akeneo
Apple Numbers
Attentive
Ben Murray's Standard Financial Plan
Blox
Business Model Fiddle
Christoph Janz's Financial Model
Correlation Point
Crossval
Cube Planning
EasyFinancialModels.com
FinModelsLab
Flylines
Foresee
Full RiskLens
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Invest for Excel
Lean Monitor
Lean Stack
Martus Solutions
Microsoft 365 Lighthouse
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management
Pimcore
ProjectionHub
Qube
QuickDBD / dbdiagram.io
Score.org Free Templates
Siemens Teamcenter
Strategyzer
Tableau Creator
Thinknum
Zoho Sheet
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.