Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Financial modeling › Google Sheets vs Prophix One
Financial modeling and scenario planning · November 2026 Edition

Google Sheets vs Prophix One

Zero of fourteen models named Google Sheets first on the direct prompt; zero named Prophix One. Google Sheets was named by nine of the fourteen models and Prophix One by nine and Google Sheets carries 10 labels and Prophix One 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Google Sheets

accepted challenger

Named in sixteen categories this edition.

Prophix One

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share12%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1014A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Google Sheets reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Datarails was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Excel vs Google Sheets · Microsoft Excel vs Prophix One · Datarails vs Google Sheets

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial modeling and scenario planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Google SheetsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProphix One
Direct00
Paraphrase04
Comparative00
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Google Sheets and Prophix One stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Google Sheets Prophix One first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Google Sheets on the left and Prophix One on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Google Sheets and Prophix One stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashPigment alternatives: Aleph, Cube, Datarails, Prophix One
Muse Glimmer 30BDatarails alternatives: Aleph, Cube, Limelight, Planful, Prophix One, Vena

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Datarails alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Pigment, Planful
GPT-5.4 miniPigment, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarDrivetrain alternatives: Abacum, Datarails, Limelight, Vena
Grok 4.20Datarails alternatives: Cube, Jirav, Quantrix Modeler
Mistral SmallDatarails alternatives: Cube, Limelight, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickAleph, Datarails, Limelight
Qwen 3.7 FlashDatarails, Limelight alternatives: Aleph, Cube, Jedox, Vena
Kimi K2Cube, Datarails alternatives: Drivetrain, Jirav
GLM 4.7 FlashXDatarails alternatives: OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Vena
MiniMax M2.5Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Cube, Vena
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Planful, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Google Sheets leads by twenty-two points.
Google Sheets22%#2 of 16
Prophix One0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Google Sheets leads by five points.
Google Sheets12%#3 of 11
Prophix One7%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Google Sheets is not named for this buyer.
Google Sheets—not named
Prophix One0%#10 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Google Sheets

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“For a truly limited budget, Google Sheets or Excel remains the most cost-effective choice.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Absolute limited budget → Excel/Google Sheets + free templates such as EasyFinancialModels” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“For a truly limited budget, start with Google Sheets or Excel with free templates” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophix One

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Specifically highlighted as the best for mid-sized companies, offering a free demo and strong scenario planning capabilities tailored to mid-market needs.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Prophix One as your first look, followed closely by Planful” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.