Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › FP&A platforms › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

FP&A platforms for enterprise buyers

Name: AI model recommendations for fp&a platforms for enterprise buyers, November 2026 Edition
Creator: Gane
Published: 2026-11-01
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Asked as “FP&A software”, and as “financial planning and analysis platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.

Standing · first-choice share

49%

Anaplan

Clear leader

49Anaplan15OneStream11Workday Adaptive Planning25others

49% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Anaplan held the lead, −4 points on 53%, inside the 10-point floor.

ShowinginAll 57 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

Cube24%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Cube (24%) replaces Fathom (25% then, 17% now), 7 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market

Pigment19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Pigment (19%) replaces Planful (20% then, 7% now), 12 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise

Anaplan49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026

Anaplan22%78endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.53% → 49%

OneStream5%62accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 17% → 15%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.17% → 15%

Workday Adaptive Planning15%68accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%

Pigment17%47accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 6% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.6% → 7%

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM8%50accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%

Planful26%38criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%

Cube48%21criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%

Board9%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%

SAP Analytics Cloud8%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%

Vena37%38criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%

Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Datarails55%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

IBM Planning Analytics23%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

Prophix23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

CCH Tagetik7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

For buyers

Build your shortlist

Head to head

Pigment vs Prophix Pigment vs Cube Pigment vs Aleph

Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%

Key

Anaplan49%

OneStream15%

Workday Adaptive Planning11%

Pigment7%

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM4%

Planful4%

Cube4%

Board2%

SAP Analytics Cloud2%

Vena2%

IBM Planning Analytics0%

CCH Tagetik0%

Prophix0%

Datarails0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Vena

37%

14 of 38 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative

“Excel-Adjacent Tools (e.g., Datarails, Cube, Vena) are not designed for long-term scalability in large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

Anaplan

22%

17 of 78 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative

“Platforms Large Enterprises Should Avoid or Approach with Caution ... Anaplan ... Extremely high TCO ... "bad faith" renewal negotiations” Grok 4.20, negative prompt

Datarails

55%

12 of 22 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative

“Spreadsheet-native FP&A platforms are not built for enterprise-scale connected planning... This includes tools like Cube, Datarails, and other Excel-based solutions.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

Cube

48%

10 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative

“Excel-Adjacent Tools (e.g., Datarails, Cube, Vena) are not designed for long-term scalability in large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 896 links across 183 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 32 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

cfoshortlist.com

42 answers · 75 citations · 12 models

board.com

vendor site · Board41 answers · 69 citations · 13 models

getaleph.com

35 answers · 45 citations · 11 models

g2.com

vendor site · G229 answers · 48 citations · 10 models

erpresearch.com

29 answers · 39 citations · 10 models

prophix.com

vendor site · Prophix29 answers · 37 citations · 12 models

corporatefinanceinstitute.com

24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models

resources.rework.com

20 answers · 26 citations · 11 models

onestream.com

vendor site · OneStream18 answers · 29 citations · 9 models

datarails.com

vendor site · Datarails17 answers · 19 citations · 10 models

gane.ai/index

publisher (Gane)16 answers · 17 citations · 10 models

selecthub.com

15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises

32 answers · 12 models

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software

28 answers · 11 models

erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/fpa-planning

28 answers · 10 models

corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/fpa/fp-a-tools

24 answers · 11 models

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-2026

18 answers · 10 models

prophix.com/blog/17-best-fp-a-software-for-high-performing-fp-a-teams

18 answers · 10 models

resources.rework.com/tools/fpa-planning/best-fpa-software-2026

17 answers · 9 models

gane.ai/index/finance/planning/fpa-platforms/enterprise

16 answers · 10 models

g2.com/categories/financial-planning-and-analysis-fp-a/enterprise

13 answers · 8 models

selecthub.com/c/fp-and-a-software

12 answers · 8 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best fp&a software”, “fp&a platforms”, “fp&a software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Company and products	Share	Own site cited	Name searches, Google	AI search demand, est.	Organic visits	Paid search a month, est.	Google ads, last 30 days	Best Google position
Anaplan anaplan.com	49%	483	18,100	532	78,179		31
OneStream onestream.com	15%	553	12,100	703	32,233	$36	120
Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 11%	11%	430	1,220,000	23,848	2,213,450 company		80
Pigment pigment.com	7%	198	49,500	25,645	12,248		22
Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 4%	4%	326	260	0	7,410,638 company	$247	101
Planful planful.com	4%	357	3,600	685,726	58,997	$137	120
Cube cubesoftware.com Cube 4%, Cube FP&A Software 0%	4%	304	90,500	152,613	168,764		13	1
Board board.com	2%	147	90,500	612,482	44,405		106
SAP sap.com SAP Analytics Cloud 2%, SAP 0%	2%	121	135,000	74,309	2,214,514	$1,251	23	4
Limelight golimelight.com	2%	49	49,500	4,546	4,750		0	4

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cfoshortlist.com, corporatefinanceinstitute.com, g2.com, getaleph.com, prophix.com). The first result for “best fp&a software” is irisfinance.co.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ShowHide

ModelDirect“What is the best FP&A software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which financial planning and analysis platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade FP&A platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best FP&A software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a FP&A software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which FP&A platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Anaplan

Six alternatives

Board, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Three alternatives

Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

no first choiceWorkday Adaptive Planning

Three alternatives

Anaplan, OneStream, Planful

no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful, Vena

GPT-5.4 miniAnaplan

Four alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Three alternatives

OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan, Board, Pigment

Six alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanful, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, Planful, Vena

Gemini 3.5 FlashAnaplan

Six alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningChanged

Two alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud

Anaplan, Pigment

Four alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan

Three alternatives

IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

no first choice

Six alternatives

Anaplan, Oracle Cloud EPCM, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Cube, Datarailsagainst: Aleph, Causal, Centage, Cube, Datarails, IBM Cognos, Jirav, On-premises Hyperion, OnPlan, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Pry, Runway, Vena

Perplexity SonarAnaplan

Three alternatives

OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Five alternatives

IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan

Eight alternatives

Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: VenaOneStream

One alternative

Anaplan

against: Pigment, Planfulno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, Cube, Datarails, Fathom, IBM Planning Analytics, Jirav, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Grok 4.20Anaplan

Five alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Four alternatives

IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite Planning & Budgeting, Workday Adaptive Planning

no first choiceagainst: Pigment, Planful, VenaOneStreamagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planning

Seven alternatives

Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena

against: Centageagainst: Anaplan, Jedox, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC

Mistral SmallAnaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning

Three alternatives

Board, IBM Planning Analytics, Planful

AnaplanChanged

Five alternatives

Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan

Four alternatives

Board, OneStream, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan

Two alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning

no first choiceagainst: Cube, Datarails, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

DeepSeek V4 FlashAnaplan, Pigment

One alternative

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

AnaplanChanged

Two alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment

Anaplan

Five alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: IBM Planning AnalyticsPigment

Two alternatives

Cube, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

against: Anaplan, OneStreamAnaplan

Three alternatives

OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Anaplan, Board, Excel-based models, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planning

Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceAnaplan, Board, OneStreamChangedno first choice

Four alternatives

Aleph, Datarails, Pigment, Runway

Anaplan, OneStream, Venano first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Qwen 3.7 FlashAnaplan, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud

Five alternatives

Causal, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanChanged

Three alternatives

OneStream, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan

Four alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Cube

Two alternatives

Abacum, Board

against: Anaplan, OneStreamOneStream

Four alternatives

Anaplan, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Anaplan, Datarails, Oracle Hyperion, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Kimi K2Pigment

Eight alternatives

Anaplan, Board, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning

Workday Adaptive PlanningChanged

Three alternatives

Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment

Anaplan

Five alternatives

Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, SAP Analytics CloudOneStream

One alternative

Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Anaplan, Cube, Planful, Prophix, Venano first choice

Four alternatives

Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Abacum, Drivetrainagainst: Anaplan, Board Software, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Jedox, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

GLM 4.7 FlashXAnaplan

Three alternatives

Board, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Four alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning

Pigment

Eleven alternatives

Aleph, Anaplan, Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

One alternative

Pigment

against: Anaplan, Board, OneStreamno first choicenothing named

MiniMax M2.5Anaplan

Six alternatives

Board, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

OneStreamChanged

Four alternatives

Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, Workiva

no first choiceLimelight

One alternative

Cube

against: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Aleph, Cube, Datarails, Jirav, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP, Workday Adaptive Planning

GPT-6 LunaAnaplan

Three alternatives

OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning

AnaplanHeld

Three alternatives

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

no first choiceOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Workday Adaptive Planningno first choice

Five alternatives

Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Cube, Datarails, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Vena

Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choiceAnaplanChanged

Six alternatives

Board, CCH Tagetik, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning

Anaplan, Board, OneStream

Nine alternatives

Adaptive from Workday, CCH Tagetik, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud, Vena

Cubeagainst: Anaplan, Pigmentno first choice

Four alternatives

Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning

against: Aleph, Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, Jirav, Vena

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.

Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 12:33	yes	9	7 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 12:32	yes	3	4 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 08:54	no	0	19 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 12:29	yes	10	4 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:08	yes	9	32 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 11:42	yes	5	6 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 08:54	yes	10	14 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 12:21	yes	5	2 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 08:52	no	0	17 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 12:12	yes	9	30 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 12:00	yes	18	23 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 12:56	yes	13	40 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 08:56	yes	3	15 s
Direct recommendation	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 09:04	yes	11	17 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 11:32	yes	9	8 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 10:37	yes	6	5 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 10:56	no	0	13 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 12:05	yes	10	4 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:07	yes	5	24 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 09:00	yes	5	4 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 12:04	yes	23	23 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 09:17	yes	5	3 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 09:44	no	0	27 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 12:53	yes	10	45 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 12:43	yes	14	69 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 09:27	yes	5	19 s
Paraphrase	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 11:59	yes	4	13 s
Paraphrase	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 11:13	yes	14	19 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 09:08	yes	9	7 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 09:16	yes	7	10 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 12:28	yes	8	22 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 10:18	yes	10	5 s
Comparative	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:29	yes	5	31 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 10:51	yes	25	20 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 11:23	yes	21	37 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 09:22	yes	5	2 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 12:42	yes	10	41 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 08:54	yes	23	37 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 11:47	yes	24	266 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 11:19	yes	12	47 s
Comparative	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 11:54	yes	9	26 s
Comparative	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 10:54	yes	14	30 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 08:48	yes	16	8 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 12:35	yes	3	5 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 12:59	yes	17	27 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 10:30	yes	10	4 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:17	yes	5	31 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 12:32	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 11:37	yes	23	28 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 08:57	yes	5	3 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 09:22	yes	9	61 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 11:06	yes	24	67 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 09:04	yes	19	28 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 08:45	yes	19	94 s
Budget constrained	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 12:38	yes	2	24 s
Budget constrained	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 10:18	yes	18	29 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 09:46	yes	19	14 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 12:05	no	0	7 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 12:44	no	0	20 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 12:59	yes	10	9 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:16	yes	15	35 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 09:47	no	0	7 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 12:00	yes	21	37 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 08:59	yes	5	3 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 12:10	yes	5	29 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 09:55	yes	17	61 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 10:00	yes	22	40 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 11:04	no	0	32 s
Scale constrained	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 11:16	yes	4	22 s
Scale constrained	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 12:44	yes	12	19 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-11-01 09:43	yes	19	10 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-11-01 08:49	yes	4	7 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.6-flash` (asked for `gemini-3.5-flash`; the API answered as this version)	2026-11-01 12:00	yes	10	29 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-11-01 09:38	yes	10	5 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.20	`spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai`	2026-11-01 13:24	yes	14	37 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-11-01 09:02	yes	5	5 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-11-01 09:49	yes	23	39 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-11-01 10:53	yes	5	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-11-01 10:57	yes	25	52 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-11-01 12:51	yes	24	45 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-11-01 12:56	yes	15	86 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-11-01 11:57	yes	12	56 s
Negative framing	GPT-6 Luna	`gpt-6-luna`	2026-11-01 11:48	yes	3	26 s
Negative framing	Muse Glimmer 30B	`meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai`	2026-11-01 10:25	yes	25	30 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide

Category-scoped readings

Adaptive Insights (Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning

Adaptive Insights (now part of Workday) read as Workday Adaptive Planning

IBM read as IBM Planning Analytics

Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle Cloud EPM Planning read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle EPM Cloud (Includes Fusion Planning) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Oracle Hyperion Planning read as Oracle Hyperion

Prophix One read as Prophix

Vena Solutions read as Vena

Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) read as CCH Tagetik

Workday read as Workday Adaptive Planning

Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning

Unresolved, counted raw

Board Software

Cube FP&A Software

Excel-based models

On-premises Hyperion (HFM/Planning)

Oracle Cloud EPCM

o9 Solutions

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

FP&A platforms for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

The standing

Recommended versus criticized

What they warned about

What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

Search against answers

How they answered

The record

Normalization in this category

Also in planning and analysis