Financial reporting and dashboards for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Oracle NetSuite 21%
26Microsoft Power BI21Oracle NetSuite13OneStream40others
26% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Power BI held the lead, +4 points on 22%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Sage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This page
QuickBooks Online30%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 26% → 30%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSage Intacct15%Contested▼−18Since October 2026: 33% → 15%, −18 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI26%Contested▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Power BI26%12%41accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.22% → 26%
02
Oracle NetSuite21%20%25accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 9% → 21%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.9% → 21%
Oracle NetSuite21%20%25accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 9% → 21%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.9% → 21%03
OneStream13%0%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 11% → 13%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 13%
OneStream13%0%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 11% → 13%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.11% → 13%04
Workiva11%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%
Workiva11%0%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 9% → 11%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 11%05
Tableau4%22%32accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Tableau4%22%32accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
Workday Adaptive Planning4%11%19accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%11%19accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%07Sage Intacct4%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Sage Intacct4%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%08
Anaplan2%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Anaplan2%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
IBM Cognos Analytics0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
IBM Cognos Analytics0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
SAP S/4HANA0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP S/4HANA0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Domo0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Domo0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Oracle Analytics0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Analytics0%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Looker Lab in the set0%4%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%4%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Qlik Sense0%0%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qlik Sense0%0%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
SAP Analytics Cloud0%0%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%0%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs ProphixSage Intacct vs Xero AnalyticsSage Intacct vs Microsoft Power BISage Intacct vs CubeWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs DatarailsWave vs ProphixWave vs Xero AnalyticsWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs CubeZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs ProphixZoho Books vs Xero AnalyticsZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs CubeDatarails vs ProphixDatarails vs Xero AnalyticsDatarails vs Microsoft Power BIDatarails vs CubeProphix vs Xero AnalyticsProphix vs Microsoft Power BIProphix vs CubeXero Analytics vs Microsoft Power BIXero Analytics vs CubeMicrosoft Power BI vs Cube
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
0203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Power BI26%
02Oracle NetSuite21%
Oracle NetSuite21%03OneStream13%
OneStream13%04Workiva11%
Workiva11%05Tableau4%
Tableau4%06Workday Adaptive Planning4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%07Sage Intacct4%
Sage Intacct4%08Anaplan2%
Anaplan2%09Looker0%
Looker0%10Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%11SAP Analytics Cloud0%
SAP Analytics Cloud0%12Oracle Analytics0%
Oracle Analytics0%13Domo0%
Domo0%14SAP S/4HANA0%
SAP S/4HANA0%15IBM Cognos Analytics0%
IBM Cognos Analytics0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Excel100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Spreadsheets as the primary enterprise reporting platform. Excel or Google Sheets can be useful for controlled analysis, but they create version sprawl” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
IBM Cognos Analytics32%
6 of 19 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Legacy or On-Premises Heavy Tools (e.g., Older SAP BusinessObjects, Oracle BI, or IBM Cognos) ... Phase out where possible” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Tableau22%
7 of 32 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Tableau Server versions receive 24 months of maintenance and full support, so an enterprise unable to keep up with upgrades should factor that into its choice.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Oracle NetSuite20%
5 of 25 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for This Use Case ... Per-user SaaS ERPs (NetSuite at ~$129/user/mo” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 915 links across 355 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
20 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Simetrik17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prophix14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Capterra11 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Bold Reports11 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
17 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 9 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 5 models
7 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power BI | 26% | 14,800 | 515 | ||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 21%, Oracle Analytics 0% | 21% | 542 | 450,000 | 66,611 | |||
| OneStream onestream.com | 13% | 553 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 |
| Workiva workiva.com | 11% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 |
| Tableau tableau.com | 4% | 129 | 135,000 | 15,635 | 1,201,809 | $23 | 85 |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 4% | 4% | 430 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | |
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 4% | 4% | 500 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 |
| Acumatica acumatica.com Acumatica Cloud ERP 4% | 4% | 8 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 company | $2,934 | 120 |
| Microsoft Fabric | 4% | 22,200 | 861 | ||||
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 2% | 483 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (kanerika.com, prophix.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Oracle NetSuiteTableauChangedMicrosoft Power BIAcumatica Cloud ERPagainst: Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: HubSpot Reporting Hub, Microsoft Word, PowerPoint
Three alternatives
OneStream, Sage Intacct, WorkivaFour alternatives
Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP Analytics CloudThree alternatives
Domo, Looker, TableauTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, SAP S/4HANAGPT-5.4 miniOneStreamWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedMicrosoft Power BIWorkivaagainst: SAPno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BlackLine, IRIS CARBON, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAPThree alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Financial Management, WorkivaSeven alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects, TableauOne alternative
Microsoft Dynamics 365Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Microsoft Fabric, Microsoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Fabric / Power BIagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition, Redash, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports
Six alternatives
Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, VenaThree alternatives
Looker, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Looker, MicroStrategy, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau, ThoughtSpotThree alternatives
Acumatica Cloud ERP, OneStream, WorkivaPerplexity SonarOracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIOneStreamagainst: Acumatica Cloud ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANAno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Google Sheets, Metabase, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
Maxio, OneStream, WorkivaFive alternatives
Anaplan, Looker, Sigma Computing, Tableau, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwelve alternatives
Domo, FineReport, IBM Cognos Analytics, Jaspersoft, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Analytics Publisher, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, SQL Server Reporting Services, Sisense, TableauTwo alternatives
Anaplan, WorkivaGrok 4.20Oracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: Domo, Looker, Tableauno first choiceWorkivaagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Basic Excel/Power Query Setups, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Two alternatives
Sage Intacct, WorkivaThree alternatives
OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamMistral SmallOracle NetSuite, WorkivaMicrosoft Power BIChangedno first choiceOracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workdayno first choiceagainst: BlackBerry Enterprise Server, Coupa, Datadog, JD Edwards, Lotus Notes / IBM Notes, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft SharePoint, New Relic, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle PeopleSoft, SAP Ariba, SAP ERP, Sentry, Siebel CRM, Workday
Three alternatives
OneStream, SAP S/4HANA, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, TableauDeepSeek V4 FlashOracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIOneStreamagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctno first choiceagainst: Airtable, Apache Superset, ClickUp, Datapine, Google Docs, Grafana, IBM Cognos Analytics, MeisterTask, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau, Zoho Analytics
Three alternatives
Sage Intacct, Workday Financial Management, WorkivaSix alternatives
Anaplan, Domo, Looker, OneStream, Qlik Sense, TableauSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauTwo alternatives
SAP S/4HANA, WorkivaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceAlephagainst: BambooHR, BusinessObjects BI 4.3, Leapsome, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Two alternatives
BiCXO, Workday Financial ManagementQwen 3.7 FlashOracle NetSuiteagainst: Microsoft ExcelMicrosoft Power BI, TableauChangedMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Fabric, Microsoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Coupa, HubSpot, IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle NetSuite, Prophet, SAP Ariba, SAP Concur, SAP S/4HANA, Tableau
Five alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Fabric / Power BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, VenaThree alternatives
Looker, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite PlanningSix alternatives
Domo, Looker, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Sigma Computing, TableauTwo alternatives
Amazon QuickSight, Tableau Embedded AnalyticsKimi K2Oracle NetSuiteOneStreamChangedagainst: Microsoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIOneStreamagainst: EmLedger, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.3, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PigmentFour alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauTwo alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkivaMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIOracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctno first choiceagainst: Ariba, Coupa, SAP BusinessObjects, Workday, older Oracle BI
Seven alternatives
Cube, FineReport, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning, XledgerFive alternatives
FineReport, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningNine alternatives
Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Sisense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotOne alternative
Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMiniMax M2.5Oracle NetSuiteagainst: Oracle HyperionMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauAcumatica Cloud ERPno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft Excel, SAP Business Objects, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services
Five alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, OneStream, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive Planning, insightsoftwareFour alternatives
Looker, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, TableauSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjectsThree alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-6 LunaPlanfulMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Oracle FCCSno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau, Tableau Public
One alternative
OneStreamTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau, ThoughtSpotOne alternative
OneStreamMuse Glimmer 30BOneStreamMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIWorkivano first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, SSRS, Oracle BI Publisher, SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform 4.3
Nine alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, SAP, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Financial Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
Anaplan, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Sisense, TableauFive alternatives
Microsoft Power BI Premium Per Capacity, OneStream, SAP S/4HANA, Tableau, Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:50 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 20 | 66 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 1 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 24 | 117 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 23 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 24 | 120 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 24 | 110 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:56 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 24 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 24 | 88 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft Dynamics read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud (FCCS / Reporting Cloud) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Fusion read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
PowerBI read as Microsoft Power BI
Prophix One read as Prophix
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Qlik Sense / QlikView) read as Qlik Sense
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
SAP S/4HANA Finance read as SAP S/4HANA
SAP S/4HANA Finance (Cloud) read as SAP S/4HANA
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Syft read as Syft Analytics
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Xero read as Xero Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Angles for SAP
Basic Excel/Power Query Setups
BiCXO
BlackBerry Enterprise Server
EmLedger
HubSpot Reporting Hub
LookML
Lotus Notes / IBM Notes
Microsoft Power BI Premium Per Capacity
Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, SSRS
Microsoft SharePoint (on-premise versions)
Microsoft Word
Omni
One Model
Oracle Analytics Publisher
Oracle BI Publisher
Oracle NetSuite Planning
Plotly Dash Enterprise
Prophet
Qlik Cloud Analytics
SAP Business Objects
SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform 4.3
SAS Viya
Siebel CRM
Strategy One
TIBCO Spotfire
Tableau Embedded Analytics
Visier
Wands for Oracle
Workday Financials reporting
Yellowfin
older Oracle BI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.