Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Financial reporting › Prophix vs Cube
Financial reporting and dashboards · November 2026 Edition

Prophix vs Cube

Two of fourteen models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; zero named Cube. Prophix was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Cube by nine and both carry 14 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Prophix

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Cube

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share7%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1414Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Prophix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sage Intacct was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Sage Intacct vs Prophix · Sage Intacct vs Cube · Wave vs Prophix

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial reporting and dashboards page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProphixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCube
Direct20
Paraphrase22
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Prophix and Cube were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 262 answers naming Prophix and the 352 naming Cube. In those answers Cube took the first choice fourteen times and Prophix eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Prophix and Cube stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Prophix Cube first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Cube on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Prophix and Cube stood in it.

Prophix first, Cube not the choice

2 of 14 modelsCube was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaProphix alternatives: Planful, Sage Intacct, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BProphix alternatives: Maxio, Planful, Sage Intacct

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Planful, Prophix, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, Pigment alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Planful, Sage Intacct
Perplexity SonarSage Intacct alternatives: Limelight, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Prophix, Vena

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workiva
Grok 4.20Sage Intacct alternatives: Workday Adaptive Planning, Workiva
Mistral SmallOracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Fathom
DeepSeek V4 FlashSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Oracle NetSuite, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashSage Intacct alternatives: Datarails, Maxio, Oracle NetSuite, Simetrik, Vena
Kimi K2Sage Intacct alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Workday Adaptive Planning
GLM 4.7 FlashXOracle NetSuite alternatives: Datarails, Sage Intacct
MiniMax M2.5Datarails alternatives: Centage, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Prophix0%#– of 11
Cube0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Prophix leads by four points.
Prophix7%#5 of 18
Cube4%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Prophix0%#– of 15
Cube0%#– of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Prophix

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Cube

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.