November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › SaaS metrics › Small business · November 2026 Edition

SaaS metrics and analytics for small business buyers

Asked as “SaaS metrics dashboard”, and as “ARR analytics tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41ChartMogul21ProfitWell Metrics16Baremetrics21others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−12Since October 2026: 53% → 41%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.ChartMogul held the lead, −12 points on 53%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ChartMogul41%7%68endorsed leader▼−12Since October 2026: 53% → 41%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.53% → 41%
02ProfitWell Metrics21%6%48accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 26% → 21%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.26% → 21%
03Baremetrics16%12%58accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 13% → 16%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.13% → 16%
04Databox7%3%35accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%
05Looker Studio Lab in the set5%9%23accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
06Intempt2%10%10accepted challengernewNew since October 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Tableau0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Maxio Metrics0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Google Analytics Lab in the set0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Amplitude0%54%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Heap0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Microsoft Power BI0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Mixpanel0%27%37criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Metabase0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07PostHog0%7%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models three times of 52. Google Analytics is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
M10
11
12
G13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01ChartMogul41%
02ProfitWell Metrics21%
03Baremetrics16%
04Databox7%
05Looker Studio5%
06Intempt2%
07PostHog0%
08Mixpanel0%
09Metabase0%
10Microsoft Power BI0%
11Heap0%
12Amplitude0%
13Google Analytics0%
14Maxio Metrics0%
15Tableau0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amplitude
54%
15 of 28 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Enterprise-heavy tools like Amplitude, Mixpanel, or Pendo are excluded as they're more product analytics-focused and can get expensive quickly.” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Mixpanel
27%
10 of 37 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Enterprise-heavy tools like Amplitude, Mixpanel, or Pendo are excluded” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Tableau
82%
9 of 11 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid until you have a dedicated analytics person: Tableau (~$70/user/month): Requires SQL knowledge and data modeling expertise.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Maxio Metrics
77%
10 of 13 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Tools like Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics) or NetSuite SuiteAnalytics are built for late-stage SaaS companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 795 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Baremetrics46 answers · 82 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Intempt35 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Databox32 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ChartMogul23 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Basedash15 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · NetSuite14 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics dashboard”, “saas metrics tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ChartMogul chartmogul.com41%1761,00044,4672
ProfitWell paddle.com
ProfitWell Metrics 21%
21%105100172,07931
Baremetrics baremetrics.com16%136590342,517266
Databox databox.com7%1103,6006860,8614
Looker Studio lookerstudio.google.com5%7240,5004525,456
Intempt intempt.com2%20
Google Sheets google.com2%1123,350,00053,7301,800,358,416$465,9445
ScaleXP scalexp.com2%32
Cyfe cyfe.com2%2
SaaS Metrics Dashboard in Excel2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (baremetrics.com, netsuite.com). The first result for “best saas metrics dashboard” is uxcam.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ARR analytics tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top SaaS metrics tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SaaS metrics dashboard for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a SaaS metrics dashboard. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SaaS metrics tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, Metabase
ChartMogulChanged
One alternativeBaremetrics
Google Analytics
Four alternativesBaremetrics, Heap, Hotjar, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Amplitude
ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesGeckoboard, Looker Studio
no first choiceagainst: Domo, FullStory, Google Analytics, Heap, Pendo, Salesforce Analytics, Tableau, Zoho Analytics
GPT-5.4 miniChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
BaremetricsChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Power BI, Subscript
Mixpanel
Five alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
Databox
Two alternativesChartMogul, Stripe Sigma
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartMogul
Five alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, Geckoboard, June.so, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogulHeld
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Maxio Metrics, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, PostHog
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesDatabox, Looker Studio, Stripe Billing Analytics
ChartMogul
Four alternativesBaremetrics, Causal, Mosaic, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Amplitude, Basic Stripe Reporting, Domo, Heap, Looker, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, Oracle NetSuite, Raw PayPal, Sisense, Tableau
Perplexity SonarDatabox
Five alternativesChartMogul, Dreamdata, Looker Studio, Mixpanel, PostHog
ChartMogulChanged
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Maxio Metrics, ScaleXP
Baremetrics, ChartMogul
Five alternativesDatabox, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Amplitude
Looker Studio
Four alternativesChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHog
against: Metabase
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Grok 4.20ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul
against: Founderpath, Maxio Metrics, SaaSGrid
BaremetricsChanged
Two alternativesChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Sigma Computing, Stripe Billing
ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, SaaSGrid
against: Amplitude, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, Pendo
Baremetrics
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio
against: Amplitude, Mixpanel, Pendo
no first choice
Six alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, ProfitWell Metrics, Usermaven
against: Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
against: Baremetrics, Maxio Metrics, ProfitWell Metrics
Mistral SmallIntempt
Four alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Metabase
Baremetrics, ChartMogulChanged
One alternativeProfitWell Metrics
Intempt
Five alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel
against: Maxio Metrics
Cyfe, Databox
Two alternativesChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Domo, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Pendo, Salesforce Analytics, Tableau
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio
BaremetricsChanged
Three alternativesChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell Metrics
Five alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHog
against: Amplitude
ChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, Looker Studio
against: Geckoboard, Klipfolio, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Databox
against: Maxio Metrics, Zuora Analytics
against: Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Google Analytics, Heap, HubSpot Analytics, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Pendo, Tableau
Llama 4 MaverickGoogle Sheets, SaaS Metrics Dashboard in Excel
Three alternativesIntempt, Metabase, Taskade Genesis
ChartMogul, ScaleXPChangedDatabox
Six alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Looker Studio
Three alternativesDatabox, Intempt, Microsoft Power BI
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashBaremetrics, ChartMogul
Two alternativesLooker Studio, ProfitWell Metrics
BaremetricsChanged
One alternativeChartMogul
against: Maxio Metrics
Baremetrics
Three alternativesMixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics
against: Amplitude, Databox, Intempt
ChartMogul
Seven alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, Excel or Google Sheets Templates, Looker Studio, Metabase, PostHog, Starkers.io
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, BigQuery, Google Analytics, Looker Studio, Microsoft PowerBI, Mixpanel, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Snowflake, Tableau
Kimi K2ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul
ChartMogul, ProfitWell MetricsChanged
One alternativeBaremetrics
ProfitWell Metrics
Seven alternativesAmplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Metabase, Mixpanel, PostHog
ProfitWell Metrics
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio
against: Baremetrics
ChartMogul, ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, Databox
against: SaaSGrid
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Funnel.io, Google Analytics, Heap, Hotjar, Mention, Mixpanel, PostHog, ProfitWell Metrics, Salesforce, Tableau
GLM 4.7 FlashXBaremetrics, ChartMogul
Two alternativesLooker Studio, Metabase
ChartMogulChanged
One alternativeBaremetrics
Mixpanel
Seven alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Heap, HubSpot, Intempt, Looker Studio, PostHog
against: Amplitude, Pendo
Looker Studio
Three alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, Google Analytics, ProfitWell Metrics
MiniMax M2.5ChartMogul
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Metabase, ProfitWell Metrics
ChartMogulHeld
Three alternativesBaremetrics, Databox, ScaleXP
Baremetrics, ProfitWell Metrics
Four alternativesChartMogul, GrowthBook, Intempt, Mixpanel
ChartMogul, Databox
Three alternativesLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, Sage Intacct
GPT-6 LunaChartMogul
Two alternativesProfitWell Metrics, Stripe's built-in Billing analytics
ChartMogulHeld
One alternativeBaremetrics
ProfitWell Metrics
Four alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Mixpanel, PostHog
ProfitWell Metrics
One alternativeChartMogul
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, ChartMogul, Maxio Metrics, Mixpanel, PostHog, RevenueCat
Muse Glimmer 30BBaremetrics
Three alternativesChartMogul, Databox, ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell MetricsChanged
Three alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, ScaleXP
ProfitWell Metrics
Two alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul
ProfitWell Metrics
Six alternativesBaremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Mixpanel, PostHog, Taskade Genesis
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Datadog, Looker, Maxio Metrics, New Relic, Segment, Snowflake, dbt
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:18yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:59yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:54yes1015 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:07yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:04yes826 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:31yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:19yes1817 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:41yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:59no023 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:33yes1334 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:31yes1417 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:42yes1530 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:42yes411 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:29yes1520 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:40yes107 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:50yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:36yes717 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:20yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:17yes524 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:43yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:01yes2017 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:34yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:35yes524 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:42yes2020 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:24yes1049 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:53yes1026 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:20yes211 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:52yes1518 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:14yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:57yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:43no013 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:52yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:18yes535 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:01yes510 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:40yes2329 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:22yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:34yes837 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:52yes1952 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:36yes1492 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:40yes1046 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:18yes619 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:01yes1325 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:07yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:16yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:14yes823 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:47yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:13yes534 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:18yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:43yes2423 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:55yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:32yes525 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:52yes1017 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:48yes2533 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:19yes538 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:36yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:19yes1423 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:59no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:50no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:50no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:42yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:05yes541 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:49no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:10yes2128 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:26yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:41no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:12yes957 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:58yes1458 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:49no075 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:28yes213 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:37yes1325 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:37yes198 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:34yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:46yes1019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:17yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes2533 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:27yes159 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:06yes2332 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:44yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:59yes1029 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:46yes1449 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:42yes2598 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:02yes1460 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:08yes522 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:58yes1424 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (DIY Approach) read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (Data Studio) read as Looker Studio
Google Looker Studio (formerly Data Studio) read as Looker Studio
Maxio read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly Chargify + SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly ProfitWell) read as Maxio Metrics
Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics) read as Maxio Metrics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
ProfitWell read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (Metrics) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (by Stripe) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now Paddle Retain) read as ProfitWell Metrics
ProfitWell (now part of Paddle) read as ProfitWell Metrics
Stripe's built-in analytics read as Stripe Billing Analytics
Zuora read as Zuora Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Basic Stripe Reporting
BetterStack
Chargebee's built-in analytics
CloudWatch
DuckDB
Excel or Google Sheets Templates
Firebase
Funnel.io
GrowthBook
HubSpot Analytics
Mention
Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft PowerBI
Raw PayPal
Saasly
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Sleek
Starkers.io
Stripe Billing dashboards
Stripe's built-in Billing analytics
Vena Solutions Free SaaS Revenue Planning Dashboard
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← FP&A platformsAccounts payable automat →