Third-party risk management
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55UpGuard12Vanta TPRM04LT-VRM29others
55% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.UpGuard held the lead, −2 points on 53%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UpGuard39%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard55%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
ProcessUnity19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management (20%) replaces ProcessUnity (25% then, 15% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
UpGuard39%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 44% → 35%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard55%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseProcessUnity19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management (20%) replaces ProcessUnity (25% then, 15% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01UpGuard55%4%57endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 51%
UpGuard55%4%57endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 53% → 51%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.53% → 51%02
Vanta TPRM12%14%36accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 6% → 14%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 14%
Vanta TPRM12%14%36accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 6% → 14%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 14%03
Prevalent4%9%22accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
Prevalent4%9%22accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%04ProcessUnity4%24%29accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
ProcessUnity4%24%29accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%05
Panorays2%0%26accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%
Panorays2%0%26accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 2%06
Drata2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Drata2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%07
LogicGate2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
LogicGate2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Archer0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Archer0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%47%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%47%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Bitsight0%42%31criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Bitsight0%42%31criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%42%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%42%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Riskonnect0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Riskonnect0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
SecurityScorecard0%26%34criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
SecurityScorecard0%26%34criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%08
Venminder0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Venminder0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Whistic0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Whistic0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
UpGuard vs PanoraysUpGuard vs DrataUpGuard vs LogicGateVanta TPRM vs PrevalentVanta TPRM vs ProcessUnityVanta TPRM vs PanoraysVanta TPRM vs DrataVanta TPRM vs LogicGatePrevalent vs ProcessUnityPrevalent vs PanoraysPrevalent vs DrataPrevalent vs LogicGateProcessUnity vs PanoraysProcessUnity vs DrataProcessUnity vs LogicGatePanorays vs DrataPanorays vs LogicGateDrata vs LogicGate
One product takes 55% of first choices here, so the chart would put fourteen markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Six products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management47%
17 of 36 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“You cannot afford a legacy, heavyweight enterprise platform (like Archer or high-end Diligent/OneTrust suites)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Bitsight42%
13 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Quote-only pricing (SecurityScorecard, BitSight): Often expensive and unpredictable” Kimi K2, budget prompt
SecurityScorecard26%
9 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Quote-only pricing (SecurityScorecard, BitSight): Often expensive and unpredictable” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Archer76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“You should avoid heavy legacy GRC platforms (like Archer or ServiceNow), which are too expensive, complex, and require dedicated administrators.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1037 links across 178 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · UpGuard56 answers · 106 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Vanta30 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mitratech28 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bitsight25 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Risk Ledger25 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SmartSuite23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Panorays22 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Enzuzo22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sprinto19 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 8 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 8 models
21 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com | 55% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 | |
| Vanta TPRM vanta.com | 12% | 101 | 72,260 | 120 | ||||
| Prevalent mitratech.com | 4% | 96 | 74,000 | 4,082 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 | |
| ProcessUnity processunity.com | 4% | 109 | 880 | 19 | 2,672 | 17 | 2 | |
| LT-VRM | 4% | |||||||
| Panorays panorays.com | 2% | 51 | 590 | 1 | 21,228 | 5 | 5 | |
| Drata drata.com | 2% | 368 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | ||
| LogicGate logicgate.ai | 2% | 118 | 18,100 | 70 | 421 | 31 | ||
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 2% | 235 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | ||
| SmartSuite smartsuite.com | 2% | 13 | 19,550 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bitsight.com, panorays.com, riskledger.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top third-party risk management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceUpGuardChangedPrevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardSmartSuiteno first choiceagainst: Archer, AuditBoard, Bitsight, CyberGRX, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Vanta TPRM
Four alternatives
Panorays, ProcessUnity, Sprinto, WhisticFour alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
Risk Cognizance, UpGuardGPT-5.4 miniProcessUnityagainst: Archer, LogicGate, MetricStream, NAVEX, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementPrevalentChangedagainst: ArcherBitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementVanta TPRMno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
UpGuard, Vanta TPRM, Venminder, WhisticThree alternatives
Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, WhisticEight alternatives
Archer, Black Kite, LogicGate, MetricStream, ProcessUnity, RiskRecon, SAI360, SecurityScorecardTwo alternatives
Creditsafe, VenminderGemini 3.5 FlashUpGuardagainst: Archer, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardHeldagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceFair TPRM, LT-VRMDrata, Vanta TPRMagainst: Archer, Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Black Kite, Delve, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Five alternatives
Drata, Panorays, Vanta TPRM, Venminder, WhisticFour alternatives
Drata, Vanta TPRM, Viso Trust, WhisticSix alternatives
Prevalent Vendor Threat Monitor, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, Sprinto, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Panorays, Prevalent, UpGuard, WhisticPerplexity SonarUpGuardagainst: Vanta TPRMVanta TPRMChangedno first choiceUpGuardno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusionTwo alternatives
Panorays, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, StandardFusionGrok 4.20UpGuardagainst: Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuard, Vanta TPRMChangedagainst: Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Vendictno first choiceUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, TeamMate
Four alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecardThree alternatives
Drata, Panorays, SprintoTwo alternatives
Secureframe, Vanta TPRMMistral SmallVanta TPRMPrevalentChangedServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard
Four alternatives
LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusion, UpGuardFive alternatives
Aravo, Mitratech, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnityTwo alternatives
SecurityScorecard, UpGuardOne alternative
Vanta TPRMDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuardUpGuardHeldServiceNow TPRMComplyJet, UpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, RiskRecon, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard
Five alternatives
LogicGate, Panorays, Prevalent, StandardFusion, VenminderThree alternatives
Panorays, Vanta TPRM, VenminderSix alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardFour alternatives
Censys, IntelligenceBank, Prewave, SecurityTrailsLlama 4 MaverickLogicGateno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
StandardFusion, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMQwen 3.7 FlashUpGuardagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementVenn Data, WEP RiskChangedagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, SAP GRCagainst: Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Four alternatives
Panorays, Riskonnect, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMThree alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecardFour alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Mitti, Security Scorecard, SmartSuiteKimi K2UpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuard, Vanta TPRMagainst: Bitsight, MetricStream, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecardno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, PanoraysThree alternatives
Panorays, SecurityScorecard, VenminderEight alternatives
Bitsight, ComplyScore, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow TPRM, UpGuard, VenminderTwo alternatives
Secureframe, StandardFusionGLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuardUpGuardHeldUpGuardLT-VRMagainst: Vanta TPRMno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity TPRM
Three alternatives
Panorays, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMThree alternatives
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Prevalent, VenminderEleven alternatives
CoreStream, Descartes Denied Party Screening, Drata, IBM OpenPages, ISMS.online, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskonnect, Secureframe, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, VenminderTwo alternatives
Fair TPRM, UpGuardMiniMax M2.5UpGuardagainst: Bitsight, Vanta TPRMPanorays, UpGuardChangedno first choiceCyberGRX, UpGuardagainst: BitsightProcessUnityagainst: Bitsight, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, Venminder
One alternative
PanoraysThree alternatives
Cyber Sierra, Prevalent, VenminderThree alternatives
RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard, Shared AssessmentsFour alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, VenminderGPT-6 LunaUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentUpGuardHeldPrevalent, ProcessUnityagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecardSecureframeno first choiceagainst: SIG EV
Two alternatives
Vanta TPRM, WhisticTwo alternatives
Vanta TPRM, WhisticFive alternatives
Archer, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardOne alternative
WhisticMuse Glimmer 30BUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Archer, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, RiskonnectUpGuardno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, UpGuard, Venminder
Four alternatives
LogicGate, LogicManager, Panorays, WhisticThree alternatives
Panorays, Prevalent, VenminderFour alternatives
ComplyJet, Lark, SecurityScorecard, SmartSuiteBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:41 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:06 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 9 | 153 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:36 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 10 | 56 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 22 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 16 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:42 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:11 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:31 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:36 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 1 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:50 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 13 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 23 | 106 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (Third-Party Management module) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust Third-Party Management read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Vanta read as Vanta TPRM
Unresolved, counted raw
Descartes Denied Party Screening
Dun & Bradstreet
Everstream Analytics
IntelligenceBank
Lockpath
NAVEX Global
Prevalent Vendor Threat Monitor (Free Tier via Mitratech)
Prevalent, now part of Mitratech
Prewave
ProcessUnity TPRM
Risk Hawk
SIG EV
Security Scorecard
SecurityTrails
Shared Assessments
TeamMate
Vendict
Venn Data
WEP Risk
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.