Digital risk protection
Asked as “digital risk protection platform”, and as “dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · ZeroFox 14%
22UpGuard BreachSight14ZeroFox12Guardz51others
22% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01
UpGuard BreachSight22%5%21accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 22% now.
UpGuard BreachSight22%5%21accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 22% now.03
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence6%5%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 6% now.
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence6%5%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 6% now.04
Rapid7 Threat Command4%0%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Rapid7 Threat Command4%0%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.06
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection4%32%38criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection4%32%38criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.08
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%25%12criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%25%12criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%13%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%13%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.09Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform0%12%17accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
UpGuard BreachSight vs FlareUpGuard BreachSight vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSight vs BrandShieldUpGuard BreachSight vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceZeroFox vs Rapid7 Threat CommandZeroFox vs FlareZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs BrandShieldZeroFox vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Rapid7 Threat CommandSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs FlareSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs BrandShieldSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionRapid7 Threat Command vs FlareRapid7 Threat Command vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRapid7 Threat Command vs BrandShieldRapid7 Threat Command vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs BrandShieldFlare vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection vs BrandShieldRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionBrandShield vs Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
020304
0506
0708N09
10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01UpGuard BreachSight22%
UpGuard BreachSight22%02ZeroFox14%
ZeroFox14%03SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence6%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence6%04Rapid7 Threat Command4%
Rapid7 Threat Command4%05Flare4%
Flare4%06Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection4%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection4%07BrandShield4%
BrandShield4%08Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%09Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform0%
10Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection0%11CloudSEK XVigil0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ZeroFox23%
11 of 47 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Users frequently report problems with inefficient alerts, slow performance ... and a high volume of false positives.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection32%
12 of 38 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to avoid ... Recorded Future: Quote-based, but generally above $10,000/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
CrowdStrike38%
3 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“All-in-one platforms from CrowdStrike or Microsoft bundle DRP as an add-on feature with limited dark web coverage.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
CTM36029%
2 of 7 labels negative · 2 of 14 models
“this platform has faced user frustration regarding limited functionality ... and integration hurdles” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1059 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · UpGuard57 answers · 91 citations · 13 models
53 answers · 54 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Guideflow48 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G246 answers · 96 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Breachsense28 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netcraft24 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cyble20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CyberPress19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ZeroFox18 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CloudSEK16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
48 answers · 13 models
46 answers · 12 models
45 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com UpGuard BreachSight 22% | 22% | 101 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 company | 25 | ||
| ZeroFox zerofox.com | 14% | 168 | 4,400 | 129 | 10,937 | $175 | 32 | 1 |
| Guardz guardz.com | 12% | 32 | 1,900 | 27 | 5,351 | $744 | 12 | |
| SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence socradar.io | 6% | 132 | 20 | 0 | 19,499 | 0 | ||
| PhishEye phisheye.com | 6% | 3 | 10 | 0 | 17 | |||
| Rapid7 parent site Rapid7 Threat Command 4% | 4% | 51 | 14,800 | 798 | ||||
| Flare flare.io | 4% | 62 | 49,500 | 97,656 | 12,128 | 6 | 2 | |
| Recorded Future recordedfuture.com Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 4% | 4% | 129 | 6,600 | 260 | 50,278 company | 22 | 8 | |
| BrandShield brandshield.com | 4% | 29 | 720 | 48 | 1,117 | 24 | ||
| Fortra fortra.com Fortra Brand Protection 4% | 4% | 32 | 30 | 0 | 125,581 company | $34 | 60 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudsek.com, g2.com, netcraft.com, zerofox.com). The first result for “best digital risk protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top digital risk protection platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a digital risk protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital risk protection platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble VisionUpGuard BreachSightChangedDigital ShadowsBolster, Guardzno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, Microsoft
Four alternatives
BlueVoyant Sky, CrowdStrike Falcon, Rapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
Bolster AI, Red Points, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
BlueVoyant, CrowdStrike Falcon, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Cyble Vision, Rapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSightGPT-5.4 miniZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldZeroFoxZeroRiskagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bitsight, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSightTwo alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSightThree alternatives
CrowdStrike, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat CommandOne alternative
CTM360Gemini 3.5 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceFlareChangedZeroFoxSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SpyCloud, ZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Flare, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Bolster AI, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CybelAngel, Flare, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
Flare, UpGuard BreachSight, WhiteIntelPerplexity SonarRapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSightagainst: CrowdStrike, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSightChangedno first choiceProofpoint Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
One alternative
CybelAngelTwo alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, SpyCloudThree alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, PhishLabs, ZeroFoxGrok 4.20UpGuard BreachSightagainst: CrowdStrike, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceZeroFoxChangedZeroFoxGuardzRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxagainst: CloudSEK XVigil, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Rapid7 Threat Command, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
BrandShield, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceEight alternatives
CTM360, CloudSEK XVigil, Flare, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatMonOne alternative
Rapid7 Threat CommandMistral SmallUpGuard BreachSightZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionPhishEyeno first choiceagainst: ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Kaduu, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFive alternatives
CrowdStrike, Cyberint, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, QSafe, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Guardz, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard BreachSightagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionBrandShieldChangedagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxGuardzagainst: BlueVoyant, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Brandwatch, CTM360, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Four alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Flare, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxSeven alternatives
Breachsense, CTM360, Cyberint, Digital Shadows, Doppel, Flare, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
CTM360, CrowdStrike Falcon GoSeven alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CrowdStrike Falcon, Flare, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxLlama 4 MaverickFortra Brand Protectionno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Kaduu, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSightQwen 3.7 FlashRapid7 Threat CommandZeroFoxChangedZeroFoxGuardz, PhishEyeagainst: Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platformno first choiceagainst: CTM360, ZeroFox
Four alternatives
Corvus Logic, Cyberhaven, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ThreatConnectTwo alternatives
Intel471, Tenable Exposure ManagementFive alternatives
Check Point Cyberint, Flashpoint, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike, UpGuard BreachSightKimi K2UpGuard BreachSightBolster, UpGuard BreachSightChangedagainst: PhishLabsno first choiceGuardz, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
ZeroFoxSeven alternatives
BrandShield, CloudSEK XVigil, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, PhishLabs, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, PhishEyeGLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard BreachSightagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionChangedGroup-IB Digital Risk ProtectionCrowdStrike Falconno first choiceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
One alternative
BolsterTwo alternatives
Bitsight, BrandShieldFive alternatives
Flashpoint, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Red Points, ZeroFoxFive alternatives
Censys, CloudSEK XVigil, Kickidler DLP, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, SpikerzMiniMax M2.5UpGuard BreachSightZeroFoxChangedno first choicePhishEyeno first choiceagainst: ZeroFox
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
Fortra Brand ProtectionFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Go, Guardz, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ThreatMonGPT-6 LunaCybelAngel CoreFortra Brand ProtectionChangedZeroFoxFlareno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Bolster, BrandShield, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Flare, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceSix alternatives
Bolster, Check Point External Risk Management, Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter DRPOne alternative
Brand ProtectorMuse Glimmer 30BUpGuard BreachSightBrandShield, DarkVaultChangedGroup-IB Digital Risk ProtectionGuardz, UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Serviceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
One alternative
CybelAngelTwo alternatives
Flare, ZeroFoxSix alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CrowdStrike Falcon, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon IntelligenceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:52 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:55 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:13 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:25 | yes | 24 | 192 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:52 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:21 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:45 | yes | 14 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:55 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:16 | yes | 14 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 18 | 66 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:33 | yes | 16 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:12 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 18 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 25 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 19 | 74 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 7 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 25 | 124 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:49 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:29 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:43 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:40 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:24 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:52 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:27 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 22 | 93 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:15 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:54 | yes | 14 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:35 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 17 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CloudSEK read as CloudSEK XVigil
CloudSEK (XVigil) read as CloudSEK XVigil
Cyble read as Cyble Vision
Flare.io read as Flare
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (formerly PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Group-IB read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Group-IB DRP read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Netcraft read as Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Rapid7 (InsightVM + InsightIDR) read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Recorded Future read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future (Digital Risk Protection) read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future DRP read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (GreyMatter DRP) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
SOCRadar read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
SOCRadar (by Outpost24) read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
SOCRadar Digital Risk Protection Platform read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard (BreachSight / Breach Risk) read as UpGuard BreachSight
UpGuard Breach Risk read as UpGuard BreachSight
Unresolved, counted raw
Check Point Cyberint
Check Point External Risk Management
Corvus Logic
CybelAngel Core
Digital Era Group's Dark Web Monitoring service
Flashpoint Brand Intelligence
Fortra's Online Brand Protection Software
Group‑IB
IntSights [now VMware Carbon Black]
Lunar
ScanmyEmail
Tenable Exposure Management
UpGuard Breach Risk Self-Service
WhiteIntel
ZeroRisk
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.