Digital risk protection for enterprise buyers
Asked as “digital risk protection platform”, and as “dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 21%
29ZeroFox21Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection08CrowdStrike Falcon42others
29% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
UpGuard BreachSight vs ZeroFoxUpGuard BreachSight vs SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceUpGuard BreachSight vs Rapid7 Threat Command
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
UpGuard BreachSight vs FlareUpGuard BreachSight vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSight vs BrandShieldUpGuard BreachSight vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceZeroFox vs Rapid7 Threat CommandZeroFox vs FlareZeroFox vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFox vs BrandShieldZeroFox vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Rapid7 Threat CommandSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs FlareSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs BrandShieldSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionRapid7 Threat Command vs FlareRapid7 Threat Command vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRapid7 Threat Command vs BrandShieldRapid7 Threat Command vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionFlare vs BrandShieldFlare vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection vs BrandShieldRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection vs Proofpoint Digital Risk ProtectionBrandShield vs Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02N03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01ZeroFox29%
ZeroFox29%02Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection21%
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection21%03Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform8%
04Group-IB Digital Risk Protection8%
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection8%05Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection2%06UpGuard BreachSight2%
UpGuard BreachSight2%07Rapid7 Threat Command0%
Rapid7 Threat Command0%08Fortra Brand Protection0%
Fortra Brand Protection0%09SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence0%10CloudSEK XVigil0%
CloudSEK XVigil0%11ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection0%
ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ZeroFox16%
8 of 49 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms with Known Issues ### ZeroFox - Inefficient alerts: Takedowns often take too long or remain incomplete” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection15%
9 of 60 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Examples to approach with caution: Recorded Future ... High total cost of ownership (TCO) with high analyst overhead and outsourced execution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection19%
5 of 26 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Limited automation for takedowns... Overwhelming UI: Dashboard complexity can be difficult to navigate” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
CrowdStrike40%
2 of 5 labels negative · 2 of 14 models
“paying for this platform solely for DRP is likely overkill and significantly more expensive than Recorded Future or Group-IB” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1117 links across 227 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
52 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow51 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · UpGuard45 answers · 52 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G239 answers · 77 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Breachsense32 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netcraft27 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ZeroFox23 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Recorded Future22 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CyberPress20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CloudSEK18 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
50 answers · 11 models
49 answers · 12 models
39 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platform”, “digital risk protection platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroFox zerofox.com | 29% | 168 | 4,400 | 129 | 10,937 | $175 | 32 | 1 |
| Recorded Future recordedfuture.com Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection 21%, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud 4% | 25% | 163 | 6,600 | 260 | 50,278 company | 22 | 8 | |
| Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform netcraft.com | 8% | 81 | 0 | 6,024 | 12 | 4 | ||
| Group-IB group-ib.com Group-IB Digital Risk Protection 8% | 8% | 42 | 20 | 0 | 44,299 company | 1 | 2 | |
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon 8%, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence 0% | 8% | 201 | 74,000 | 5,130 | ||||
| BrandShield brandshield.com | 4% | 29 | 720 | 48 | 1,117 | 24 | ||
| Cyble Vision cyble.com | 4% | 91 | 30 | 1 | 20,856 | 11 | ||
| Proofpoint parent site Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection 2% | 2% | 43 | 27,100 | 1,488 | ||||
| UpGuard upguard.com UpGuard BreachSight 2% | 2% | 101 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 company | 25 | ||
| RiskProfiler | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cloudsek.com, g2.com, group-ib.com, netcraft.com, recordedfuture.com, zerofox.com). The first result for “best digital risk protection platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital risk protection platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dark web and brand impersonation monitoring service would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade digital risk protection platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital risk protection platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a digital risk protection platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital risk protection platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionCyble VisionChangedCloudSEK XVigilCrowdStrike Falconno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, Microsoft
Five alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CrowdStrike, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
Digital Shadows, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxFour alternatives
BlueVoyant Sky, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat CommandOne alternative
UpGuard BreachSightGPT-5.4 miniZeroFoxRiskProfilerChangedZeroFoxRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
CTM360, Check Point Exposure Management, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Red Points, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceOne alternative
Searchlight CyberThree alternatives
CTM360, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceGemini 3.5 FlashZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxGroup-IB Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Brandwatch, Cyble Vision, Mention, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Reputation House, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox
Five alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, CybelAngel, Flare, Rapid7 Threat Command, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
Flare, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
CybelAngel, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
CTM360, ZeroFoxPerplexity SonarRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionUpGuard BreachSightagainst: CloudSEK XVigil, CybelAngel, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionFour alternatives
Kroll, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SpyCloudFive alternatives
Fortra PhishLabs, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxOne alternative
BitsightGrok 4.20Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionZeroFoxChangedagainst: FlashpointZeroFoxCrowdStrike Falconagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSight
Three alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxThree alternatives
Bitsight, Fortra Brand Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionSix alternatives
CTM360, CrowdStrike, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, UpGuard BreachSightMistral SmallNetcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionCyble Vision, ZeroFoxChangedGroup-IB Digital Risk ProtectionCrowdStrike Falconagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Agency, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortra Brand Protection
One alternative
Fortra Brand ProtectionThree alternatives
Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFOX Digital Risk ProtectionDeepSeek V4 FlashRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ZeroFoxZeroFoxChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protectionno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Netcraft DRP Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Rapid7 Threat CommandTwo alternatives
Fortra Brand Protection, SpyCloudFive alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Digital Shadows, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, ZeroFoxOne alternative
CrowdStrike FalconLlama 4 MaverickNetcraft Digital Risk Protection Platformno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
IRIS, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, SearchLightQwen 3.7 FlashBreachsense, Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionBrandShieldChangedRecorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionThree alternatives
Clearsky, Intel.io, RedPointsFive alternatives
DarkOwl, Digital Shadows, Fortra Brand Protection, IntSights, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatConnect PlatformKimi K2Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxNetcraft Digital Risk Protection PlatformChangedNetcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionProofpoint Digital Risk Protectionagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxNetcraft Digital Risk Protection Platformagainst: ZeroFox
Four alternatives
Digital Shadows, Mandiant Advantage, Microsoft RiskIQ, Proofpoint DRPOne alternative
Fortra Brand ProtectionFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra PhishLabs, Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, UpGuard BreachSightFour alternatives
PhishLabs, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxGLM 4.7 FlashXZeroFoxZeroFoxHeldZeroFoxRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionagainst: CrowdStrikeno first choiceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
CloudSEK XVigil, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceFour alternatives
CTM360, Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, Red Points, SOCRadar Extended Threat IntelligenceOne alternative
Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionMiniMax M2.5no first choiceZeroFoxChangedagainst: RiskReconMandiant Advantage, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionCrowdStrike Falcon, Secure60against: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Two alternatives
Digital Shadows, Intel471Three alternatives
Digital Shadows, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, ZeroFoxTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, RiskProfilerGPT-6 LunaZeroFoxZeroFox’s Digital Risk Protection serviceChangedno first choiceRecorded Future Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFox
Three alternatives
Bolster, Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionTwo alternatives
Flare, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionOne alternative
ZeroFoxMuse Glimmer 30BBrandShield, Recorded Future Intelligence CloudRecorded Future Digital Risk Protection, ZeroFoxChangedCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Recorded Future Digital Risk ProtectionGroup-IB Digital Risk Protectionno first choiceagainst: Axur Platform, CybelAngel
Two alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Fortra Brand ProtectionThree alternatives
Bitsight Brand & Executive Intelligence, CrowdStrike Falcon Digital Risk, Group-IB Digital Risk ProtectionFive alternatives
Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, ReliaQuest GreyMatter with Digital Shadows SearchLight, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFoxOne alternative
Secure60Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:12 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 7 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 23 | 54 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:21 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:36 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:49 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:20 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:04 | no | 0 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:38 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:45 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 16 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 18 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:44 | yes | 24 | 98 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:09 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 6 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 21 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 21 | 66 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:07 | yes | 18 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 20 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:01 | yes | 15 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:49 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:13 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:32 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:01 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 8 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:50 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:38 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:13 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:56 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 15 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:01 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:09 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 19 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:53 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CloudSEK read as CloudSEK XVigil
Cyble read as Cyble Vision
Flare.io read as Flare
Fortra read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (Brand Protection & Digital Risk) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Fortra (PhishLabs) read as Fortra Brand Protection
Group-IB read as Group-IB Digital Risk Protection
Mandiant read as Mandiant Advantage
Mandiant (Google Cloud) read as Mandiant Advantage
Netcraft read as Netcraft Digital Risk Protection Platform
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Proofpoint (with PhishLabs) read as Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Rapid7 (incl. InsightVM & Cloud Security) read as Rapid7 Threat Command
Recorded Future read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future (Digital Risk Protection Module) read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
Recorded Future (Mastercard) read as Recorded Future Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (formerly Digital Shadows SearchLight) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
ReliaQuest (via GreyMatter / Digital Shadows) read as ReliaQuest GreyMatter Digital Risk Protection
SOCRadar read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
SOCRadar Digital Risk Protection Platform read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
Upguard read as UpGuard BreachSight
Unresolved, counted raw
BforeAI
Bitsight Brand & Executive Intelligence
Clearsky
CrowdStrike Falcon Digital Risk
Cyble Brand Intelligence
DarkOwl (Veritas)
Group\u2011IB
Hibp
Intel.io
Mandiant Digital Risk Protection
Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring
Microsoft Defender for External Risk
Microsoft RiskIQ
Netcraft DRP Platform
RSA Brand Protection
Rapid7 Digital Risk Protection
RedPoints
ReliaQuest GreyMatter with Digital Shadows SearchLight
Reputation House
Resecurity
Searchlight Security
ThreatConnect Platform
Zensar Tech
ZeroDay
ZeroFOX Digital Risk Protection
ZeroFox HNTR
ZeroFox Protection
ZeroFox’s Digital Risk Protection service
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.