Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Process mining · November 2026 Edition

Microsoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

One of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Microsoft Power Automate was named by seven of the fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate carries 10 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Power Automate

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%33%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1049A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power AutomateFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Direct105 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Paraphrase013 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Comparative00
Budget-constrained101 against Microsoft Power Automate · 3 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Microsoft Power Automate · 5 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
ModelDirectSSParaphraseSSComparativeSSBudget-constrainedSSScale-constrainedSSNegativeSS
Claude Haiku 4.5SS
GPT-5.4 miniSSSSSS
Gemini 3.5 FlashSSSSSS
Perplexity SonarSSSSSSSS
Grok 4.20SSSSSSSSSS
Mistral SmallSSSSSS
DeepSeek V4 FlashSSSSSSSSSS
Llama 4 MaverickSS
Qwen 3.7 FlashSSSSSS
Kimi K2SSSSSS
GLM 4.7 FlashXSSSSSS
MiniMax M2.5SSSS
GPT-6 LunaSSSSSSSS
Muse Glimmer 30BSSSSSS
Microsoft Power AutomateSS SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniApromore alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcessMind alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXUiPath Process Mining, process.science alternatives: IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
Mistral SmallABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickMindzie
Kimi K2Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: IBM Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BKye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate leads by sixteen points.
Microsoft Power Automate16%#3 of 13
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Power Automate leads by two points.
Microsoft Power Automate4%#6 of 11
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Power Automate leads by four points.
Microsoft Power Automate4%#5 of 10
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#7 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional enterprise leaders like Celonis or SAP Signavio if budget is tight” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... SAP Signavio: Only makes sense if you're heavily invested in SAP ERP” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“I'd usually recommend SAP Signavio first if you want the best balance of capability and usability” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for SAP Environments ... Save Celonis or SAP Signavio for when: Your organization becomes larger/more complex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
“prioritize more widely endorsed platforms like Celonis, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, or SAP Signavio” Mistral Small · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.