Index › IT › Data platform › Data warehouses › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Data warehouses for small business buyers

Asked as “cloud data warehouse”, and as “analytical data warehouse platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
69%
Clear leader
69Google BigQuery20Snowflake03Amazon Redshift07others

69% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 63% → 69%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Google BigQuery held the lead, +6 points on 63%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Google BigQuery Lab in the set69%12%81endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 63% → 69%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.63% → 69%
02Snowflake20%33%78criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 20%
03Amazon Redshift3%22%80accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
04MotherDuck3%8%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
05ClickHouse Cloud2%19%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
06DuckDB2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Azure Synapse Analytics0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Databricks SQL0%41%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08PostgreSQL0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google BigQuery is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice four times of 4; the other thirteen models thirty-seven times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.

One product takes 69% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Snowflake
33%
26 of 78 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Snowflake — Its credit-based pricing with 60-second minimums and high entry floors can produce surprisingly large bills” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Amazon Redshift
22%
18 of 80 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Redshift *Provisioned* requires you to pay for nodes 24/7 regardless of whether you are running queries.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Databricks SQL
41%
16 of 39 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Why to avoid (for basic analytics): Databricks is an exceptional platform for data science, machine learning, and massive data engineering teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Google BigQuery
12%
10 of 81 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Why to be cautious: BigQuery uses an on-demand, pay-per-query billing model based on the amount of data scanned” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 676 links across 150 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 30 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · G231 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 43 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Fivetran19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Tinybird19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Atlan18 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 5 models
vendor site · MotherDuck16 answers · 36 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Google13 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud data warehouse”, “cloud data warehouse”, “cloud data warehouses”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Google BigQuery cloud.google.com69%2248,1003597,405,347
Snowflake snowflake.com20%226368,00037,077718,749118
Amazon aws.amazon.com
Amazon Redshift 3%, Amazon Athena 0%, Amazon Aurora 0%, Amazon RDS 0%
3%193151,000,0001,380,9399,238,321$20,476
MotherDuck motherduck.com3%295,4006622,21230
ClickHouse Cloud clickhouse.com2%1681,0001543,805473
DuckDB duckdb.org2%1218,10068615,468
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse 0%, Microsoft Fabric / Synapse 0%
0%632,240,000403,136
PostgreSQL postgresql.org
PostgreSQL 0%, PostgreSQL plus Metabase 0%
0%7774,00014,143465,585
Firebolt firebolt.io0%174,4009236,6200
Tinybird tinybird.co0%8

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (clickhouse.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best cloud data warehouse” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best cloud data warehouse for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which analytical data warehouse platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top cloud data warehouses for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud data warehouse for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a cloud data warehouse. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud data warehouses should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Databricks SQL
Google BigQuery, SnowflakeHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Two alternativesMotherDuck, Panoply
Google BigQuery
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift Spectrum, DuckDB
against: Snowflake
no first choiceagainst: SQL DB, Snowflake
GPT-5.4 miniGoogle BigQuery
One alternativeAmazon Redshift
against: Snowflake
SnowflakeChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Snowflake
Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery
One alternativeMicrosoft Fabric Data Warehouse
against: Databricks SQL, Snowflake
Snowflake
Two alternativesDatabricks SQL, Google BigQuery
against: Amazon Redshift
against: Amazon Redshift, Databricks SQL warehouses, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle BigQuery
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, MotherDuck, PostgreSQL, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Two alternativesMotherDuck, Snowflake
Snowflake
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Google BigQuery, MotherDuck
Google BigQuery, MotherDuck
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, DuckDB, Serverless Postgres
against: Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, MotherDuck
against: Amazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Snowflake, Teradata Vantage
Perplexity SonarGoogle BigQuery
Six alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, DuckDB, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, PostgreSQL, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, MotherDuck, PostgreSQL plus Metabase, Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Databricks SQL
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, PostgreSQL plus Metabase
against: Snowflake
no first choice
Five alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric / Synapse, Snowflake
against: Amazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud or Firebolt, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric or Azure Synapse, Snowflake
Grok 4.20Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, Snowflake
against: ClickHouse Cloud, Databricks SQL
Google BigQueryHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
against: Databricks SQL
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Snowflake
against: Azure Synapse Analytics
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric or Azure Synapse, Self-managed Postgres
against: Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
against: Databricks SQL, Oracle, Teradata Vantage
against: Amazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, SAP HANA, Snowflake
Mistral SmallGoogle BigQuery
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
One alternativeDatabricks SQL
against: Amazon Redshift
Google BigQueryagainst: Amazon Redshift, SnowflakeAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
Three alternativesClickHouse Cloud, Firebolt, Google BigQuery
against: Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
DeepSeek V4 FlashGoogle BigQuery
One alternativeSnowflake
against: Amazon Redshift
Google BigQueryHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, DuckDB, MotherDuck
against: Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, MotherDuck, Snowflake
Google BigQuery, MotherDuck
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud
against: Databricks SQL, Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
against: ClickHouse Cloud
against: Amazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Google BigQuery, IBM Db2 Warehouse, Snowflake, Teradata Vantage
Llama 4 MaverickGoogle BigQueryagainst: Amazon Redshift, SnowflakeGoogle BigQueryHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Mozart Data, Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAzure Data Lake Analytics, Databricks SQL, Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Two alternativesAzure Data Lake Analytics, Databricks SQL
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics
Qwen 3.7 FlashSnowflake
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Google BigQuery
Google BigQueryChanged
Three alternativesFivetran, Snowflake, Stitch
Google BigQuery
Six alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Firebolt, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, Snowflake, Tinybird
Google BigQuery
One alternativeAmazon Redshift
against: Snowflake
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Delta Lake, Pivotal HD / Cloudera CDP, Snowflake, Teradata Vantage
Kimi K2Google BigQuery
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Three alternativesClickHouse Cloud, Firebolt, Snowflake
MotherDuck
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, MotherDuck
against: Snowflake
Snowflake
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Google BigQuery
against: Azure Synapse Analytics, Databricks SQL
against: Amazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, Snowflake
GLM 4.7 FlashXGoogle BigQuery, Snowflake
One alternativeAmazon Redshift
against: ClickHouse Cloud, Databricks SQL, MotherDuck
Google BigQueryChanged
One alternativeAmazon Redshift
against: DuckDB, MotherDuck, Snowflake
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, MotherDuck, PostgreSQL
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Matillion, Snowflake
MiniMax M2.5Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Snowflake
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Azure Synapse Analytics, Snowflake
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
GPT-6 LunaGoogle BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, Snowflake
Google BigQueryHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Google BigQuery
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse, Snowflake
against: Databricks SQL
Google BigQuery
Two alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud
no first choice
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
against: Amazon Redshift, Databricks SQL, Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Muse Glimmer 30BGoogle BigQuery
Four alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Snowflake, Tinybird
SnowflakeChanged
Two alternativesGoogle BigQuery, Mozart Data
Google BigQuery, Snowflake
Three alternativesAmazon Redshift, ClickHouse Cloud, Databricks SQL
ClickHouse Cloud, DuckDB
Two alternativesGoogle BigQuery on-demand, MotherDuck
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Redshift, Amazon Redshift Provisioned, BigQuery On-Demand, Databricks SQL, Snowflake
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:20no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:28yes38 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:56no011 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:47yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:18yes511 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:28yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:40yes2327 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:43yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:41no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:05yes1016 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 19:02yes1445 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:50yes735 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:45yes414 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:09yes1321 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:29no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:18yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:11no018 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:33yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:16yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:29yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:50yes2120 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:00yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:19yes1545 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:41yes1336 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:44yes1419 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:13yes1532 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:59yes37 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:56yes818 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:03yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:43yes46 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:48no015 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:28yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:45yes1014 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:37yes1010 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:57yes2539 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:26yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:37yes534 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:27yes1527 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:36yes1358 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:13yes1019 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:22yes516 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:02yes1429 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:32no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:51yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:14no017 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:19yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:54yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:47yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:31yes2526 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:05yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:52yes529 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:50yes1552 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 19:04yes1547 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:42yes518 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:28yes48 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:12yes1320 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:32no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:32no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:18no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:35yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:16yes516 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:13no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:48yes1925 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:50yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:47no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:44yes560 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:44yes1586 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:58no063 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:29yes517 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:38no03 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:46yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:13yes47 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:45no017 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:14yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:29yes1414 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:24yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:50yes2455 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:59yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:56no030 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:03yes2043 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:34yes1827 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:05yes525 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:17yes415 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:45yes2326 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Azure Synapse read as Azure Synapse Analytics
Azure Synapse (Microsoft) read as Azure Synapse Analytics
Databricks read as Databricks SQL
Databricks (Lakehouse / Delta Lake) read as Databricks SQL
Databricks (Lakehouse) read as Databricks SQL
Databricks SQL / Lakehouse read as Databricks SQL
Microsoft Fabric read as Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Microsoft Fabric (or Azure Synapse) read as Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Microsoft Fabric (with Synapse) read as Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Microsoft Fabric Warehouse read as Microsoft Fabric Data Warehouse
Teradata read as Teradata Vantage
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Redshift Provisioned
Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Apache Iceberg
BigQuery On-Demand
ClickHouse Cloud or Firebolt
Databricks SQL warehouses
Delta Lake
Google BigQuery on-demand
Pivotal HD / Cloudera CDP
Postgres with Timescale
SQL DB
Self-managed Postgres (e.g., on AWS RDS, Supabase, or Neon)
Serverless Postgres (e.g., Neon or Supabase)
hosted PostgreSQL
managed Postgres
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Data virtualizationEDI →