AI governance platforms for small business buyers
Asked as “AI governance platform”, and as “tool to govern AI models and AI use cases”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Strac10Credo AI06Fairly AI41others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Strac held the lead, +12 points on 31%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Strac43%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-market
Credo AI19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIBM watsonx.governance29%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Strac43%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-marketCredo AI19%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIBM watsonx.governance29%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Strac43%3%37endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.31% → 43%
Strac43%3%37endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 31% → 43%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.31% → 43%02Credo AI10%50%50criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 10%
Credo AI10%50%50criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 10%03Fairly AI6%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
04
Vanta4%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Vanta4%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05
Microsoft Purview2%12%40accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Microsoft Purview2%12%40accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
Lumenova AI2%8%13accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Lumenova AI2%8%13accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%07
Drata2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Drata2%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
OneTrust AI Governance2%68%31criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
OneTrust AI Governance2%68%31criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09IBM watsonx.governance2%74%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Holistic AI0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Holistic AI0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Fiddler AI0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Fiddler AI0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Zapier0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Zapier0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Credo AI vs VantaCredo AI vs Holistic AICredo AI vs Fiddler AICredo AI vs IBM watsonx.governancedope.security vs Stracdope.security vs Microsoft Purviewdope.security vs Vantadope.security vs Holistic AIdope.security vs Fiddler AIdope.security vs IBM watsonx.governanceStrac vs Microsoft PurviewStrac vs VantaStrac vs Holistic AIStrac vs Fiddler AIStrac vs IBM watsonx.governanceMicrosoft Purview vs VantaMicrosoft Purview vs Holistic AIMicrosoft Purview vs Fiddler AIMicrosoft Purview vs IBM watsonx.governanceVanta vs Holistic AIVanta vs Fiddler AIVanta vs IBM watsonx.governanceHolistic AI vs Fiddler AIHolistic AI vs IBM watsonx.governanceFiddler AI vs IBM watsonx.governance
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102F03
0405060708I09
101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Strac43%
Strac43%02Credo AI10%
Credo AI10%03Fairly AI6%
04Vanta4%
Vanta4%05Microsoft Purview2%
Microsoft Purview2%06Lumenova AI2%
Lumenova AI2%07Drata2%
Drata2%08OneTrust AI Governance2%
OneTrust AI Governance2%09IBM watsonx.governance2%
10Zapier0%
Zapier0%11Fiddler AI0%
Fiddler AI0%12Holistic AI0%
Holistic AI0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
IBM watsonx.governance
74%
26 of 35 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“the majority of AI models across the board warn small businesses against enterprise-grade platforms like IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust, and Credo AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Credo AI50%
25 of 50 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Small businesses should skip enterprise platforms (Credo AI, Holistic AI, OneTrust AI Governance, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OneTrust AI Governance68%
21 of 31 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“often priced for larger compliance programs (estimates $10K–$50K+/year)... add unnecessary layers (and costs) for small ops” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ModelOp Center100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid over-engineering — Enterprise tools like IBM watsonx.governance or ModelOp are likely overkill and overpriced for small companies” Kimi K2, direct prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 805 links across 231 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 50 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Strac39 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)32 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Superblocks24 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zapier21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
vendor site · UpGuard10 answers · 10 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 9 models
30 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai governance platform”, “ai governance platforms”, “best ai governance platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strac strac.io | 43% | 81 | 3,600 | 26 | 6,518 | 1 |
| Credo AI credo.ai | 10% | 156 | 2,400 | 59 | 9,753 | 5 |
| Fairly AI fairly.ai | 6% | 19 | ||||
| Vanta vanta.com | 4% | 381 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 |
| VerifyWise verifywise.ai | 4% | 5 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview 2% | 2% | 514 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||
| Lumenova AI lumenova.ai | 2% | 15 | 70 | 0 | 1,571 | 7 |
| Drata drata.com | 2% | 368 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 |
| Langfuse langfuse.com | 2% | 48 | 18,100 | 216 | 8,530 | 4 |
| Qlik Staige | 2% | 10 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com). The first result for “ai governance platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best AI governance platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to govern AI models and AI use cases would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top AI governance platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI governance platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an AI governance platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AI governance platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Lumenova AIno first choiceChangedLumenova AIagainst: Credo AIZelkirno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
VerifyWise, ZelkirFour alternatives
Fiddler AI, Maxim AI, Microsoft Purview, ZelkirTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, VerifyWiseGPT-5.4 miniCredo AIMicrosoft's AI governance capabilities in Azure / FoundryChangedCredo AIagainst: Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Relyance AI, SAP, ServiceNow AI Control TowerVantaagainst: Airiano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerOne alternative
IBM watsonx.governanceThree alternatives
Monitaur, OneTrust AI Governance, TrustibleGemini 3.5 FlashCredo AI, Trustibleagainst: IBM watsonx, OneTrust AI GovernanceDrata, VantaChangedagainst: IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI GovernanceEnzai, Trustibleagainst: IBM watsonx.governanceLangfuse, VerifyWiseagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: DataRobot, IBM OpenScaleagainst: Collibra, Credo AI, DataRobot Enterprise Governance, Datatron, Domino Data Lab, IBM Cloud Pak, OneTrust Enterprise AI, ServiceNow AI Governance
Five alternatives
Drata, Fiddler AI, Microsoft Purview, Speakeasy, VantaFive alternatives
Galileo, Lakera, LangSmith, Optro, TrustibleSeven alternatives
Credo AI, Drata, Lakera AI, LangSmith, Langfuse, Portkey, VantaFive alternatives
Drata, Evidently AI, Giskard, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, VantaSix alternatives
Braintrust, Drata, Lakera, LangSmith, Nightfall AI, VantaPerplexity SonarStracagainst: OneTrust AI GovernanceCredo AIChangedagainst: IBM watsonx.governanceStracagainst: ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI GovernanceStracagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: AWS SageMaker Clarify, Credo AI, Forcepoint AI controls, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Responsible AI Dashboard, Netskope, OneTrust AI Governance, Palo Alto, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, Trustible, Zscaler
Three alternatives
Credo AI, Fiddler AI, Microsoft PurviewTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceThree alternatives
Credo AI, Fiddler AI, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Fiddler AI, Microsoft Purview, ZapierGrok 4.20StracCredo AI, Fairly AIChangedagainst: Arize AI, Datatron, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewCredo AIagainst: IBM watsonx.governance, ServiceNow AI Control TowerStracagainst: Arize AX, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Netskope, OneTrust AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, Zscaler
Five alternatives
Credo AI, Fairly AI, Lumenova AI, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceThree alternatives
ClickUp's AI features, Holistic AI, Lumenova AIFour alternatives
Holistic AI, OneTrust AI Governance, Scytale, StracThree alternatives
Fairly AI, Lumenova AI, ZapierMistral SmallStracOneTrust AI Governance, OsanoChangedno first choiceQlik Staige, Stracagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Centerno first choiceagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview
Four alternatives
Credo AI, Fairly AI, Microsoft Purview, Qlik StaigeThree alternatives
Google's Model Cards, Hugging Face's Responsible AI toolkit, IBM's AI FactSheetsSix alternatives
Credo AI, Fairly AI, Fiddler AI, Microsoft Purview, Strac, ZapierTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, ZapierDeepSeek V4 FlashStracFairly AIChangedagainst: OneTrust AI GovernanceArthur AIagainst: Credo AI, Holistic AIStracagainst: Credo AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI GovernanceStracagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx, OneTrust AI Governanceagainst: Credo AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance
Three alternatives
Lumenova AI, Microsoft Purview, ZapierFour alternatives
Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview, ZapierThree alternatives
Fairly AI, Lumenova AI, StracEight alternatives
AI Management DIY Starter Kit from GRC Solutions, Arize AI, Evidently AI, Lakera, Langfuse, Microsoft Purview, Promptfoo, ZapierThree alternatives
Holistic AI, Lumenova AI, Microsoft PurviewLlama 4 MaverickCredo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Stracno first choiceChangedno first choiceStracagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Lumenova AIno first choiceagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview
Qwen 3.7 FlashStracagainst: Credo AIStracHeldStracagainst: IBM watsonx, OneTrust AI GovernanceStracagainst: IBM watsonx.governance, Lumenova, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI GovernanceMicrosoft Purviewagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview
Three alternatives
LiteLLM, Microsoft Purview, PortkeyThree alternatives
Credo AI, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust AI GovernanceTwo alternatives
Braintrust, Lumenova AITwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, ZapierTwo alternatives
Lumenova AI, StracKimi K2Aurora Trustagainst: IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp CenterFairly AIChangedArthur AIagainst: Credo AIArize AI Phoenixagainst: IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governanceno first choiceagainst: Credo AI, Holistic AI, Lumenovaagainst: Collibra, Credo AI, DataRobot, Dataiku, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, OneTrust AI Governance, Securiti AI Governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, Zapier
Three alternatives
Credo AI, Microsoft Purview, StracTwo alternatives
Credo AI, StracTwo alternatives
Fiddler AI, Microsoft PurviewFive alternatives
Guardrails AI, LiteLLM, OpenSmartRoute, Portkey, ZapierThree alternatives
Aim Security, Layerup, NativeGLM 4.7 FlashXVerifyWiseStracChangedagainst: Credo AI, OneTrust AI Governance, VantaZapierStracno first choiceagainst: Arthur AI, Credo AI, Drata, EuConform, Fiddler AI, Holistic AI, IBM watsonx.governance, ModelOp Center, OneTrust AI Governance, Secureframe, Strac, Superblocks, Systima Comply, Vanta
Three alternatives
CoreWeave Forge, Microsoft Purview, ZapierTwo alternatives
Deeploy, IBM watsonx.governanceFour alternatives
Credo AI, Microsoft Purview, Strac, Weights & BiasesSix alternatives
Comp AI, Microsoft Purview, PrivacyForge, Prompts.ai, Sprinto, ZapierMiniMax M2.5Stracagainst: Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governanceDataRobotChangedagainst: Amazon SageMakerMicrosoft Purview, StracStracno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fairly AI, Microsoft SentinelFour alternatives
FairLearn, Fiddler AI, MLflow, Model Card ToolkitFour alternatives
Apono, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, ZapierFour alternatives
AWS, Govern365, Qlik Staige, SuperblocksGPT-6 LunaAuditfy Businessno first choiceChangedagainst: OneTrust AI Governance, VantaVerifyWiseagainst: Credo AI, Holistic AI, TrustibleGAINagainst: Aicurano first choiceagainst: IBM watsonx.governance
Two alternatives
Aicura, GovarnaTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview, VantaOne alternative
NIST's AI Risk Management FrameworkMuse Glimmer 30BStracStracHeldStracStracno first choiceagainst: Credo AI, Forcepoint, Holistic AI, IBM OpenPages, IBM watsonx.governance, Netskope, OneTrust AI Governance, Palo Alto, Zscaler
Three alternatives
Credo AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft PurviewThree alternatives
Credo AI, Fairly AI, Microsoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business PremiumSeven alternatives
Arize AI, Arize AX, Credo AI, Fiddler AI, IBM watsonx.governance, Lumenova AI, PromptfooFour alternatives
FairLearn, MLflow, NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails, Qlik StaigeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:33 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:48 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:53 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:23 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 15 | 70 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:12 | no | 0 | 116 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:50 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 25 | 129 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:08 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 25 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:00 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:46 | yes | 15 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:03 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:30 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:46 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:09 | no | 0 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 15 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 22 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:55 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Arize read as Arize AX
Databricks Community Edition read as Databricks Unity Catalog
Fiddler read as Fiddler AI
IBM read as IBM watsonx.governance
Microsoft Purview AI Hub read as Microsoft Purview
ModelOp read as ModelOp Center
OneTrust read as OneTrust AI Governance
Securiti read as Securiti AI Governance
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow AI Control Tower
Unresolved, counted raw
AI Management DIY Starter Kit from GRC Solutions
AI Verify Foundation
AIGovernr
Arize AI Phoenix
Auditfy Business
BigID AI Governance
ClickUp's AI features
DataRobot Enterprise Governance
EuConform
Forcepoint AI controls
GAIN
Google Workspace AI controls
Google's Model Cards
Holisti
Hugging Face's Responsible AI toolkit
IBM OpenScale
IBM's AI FactSheets
Layerup
Microsoft 365 Copilot Admin Center
Microsoft's AI governance capabilities in Azure / Foundry
Model Card Toolkit
NIST's AI Risk Management Framework
Native
NeMo Guardrails
Netskope AI
OneTrust Enterprise AI
OpenSmartRoute
OpsIntel AI Compliance
Prompt Armor
Prufer
SHAP
Systima Comply
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.