Index › IT › Data platform › Data observability › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Data quality and observability for small business buyers

Asked as “data observability platform”, and as “data quality tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Soda 13%
40Metaplane13Soda10Insycle37others

40% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 31% → 40%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Metaplane held the lead, +9 points on 31%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Metaplane40%5%58endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 31% → 40%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.31% → 40%
02Soda13%8%52accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 9% → 13%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 13%
03Elementary5%4%24accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 1% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 5%
04Great Expectations3%19%37accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 1% → 3%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 3%
05Monte Carlo3%72%57criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%
06Grafana Cloud2%10%20accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
07New Relic2%42%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Bigeye2%55%38criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 1% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.1% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Acceldata0%100%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Datadog Data Observability0%71%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Anomalo0%64%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
D11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Metaplane40%
02Soda13%
03Elementary5%
04Great Expectations3%
05Monte Carlo3%
06Grafana Cloud2%
07New Relic2%
08Bigeye2%
09Anomalo0%
10Acceldata0%
11Datadog Data Observability0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Monte Carlo
72%
41 of 57 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Small businesses should generally avoid Monte Carlo and Acceldata due to their enterprise focus and complexity.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Bigeye
55%
21 of 38 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Quote-based per-table pricing... "Bigeye $80,000 to $180,000 Per table"... costs explode” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Datadog Data Observability
71%
17 of 24 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“77% negative rate in small business evaluations; users consistently report "rapidly escalating costs and high subscription fees"” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Anomalo
64%
14 of 22 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for Small Teams: Monte Carlo, Anomalo, Acceldata, Bigeye, or Collibra” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 834 links across 213 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 20 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · G249 answers · 99 citations · 13 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Atlan25 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DataKitchen19 answers · 36 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Metaplane16 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Monte Carlo13 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data observability platform”, “data observability platform”, “data quality and observability platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Metaplane metaplane.dev40%108590124,6988
Soda soda.io
Soda 13%, Soda Core 2%
15%124165,000348,8021,651$4019
Insycle insycle.com10%14480413,246
Elementary elementary-data.com
Elementary 5%, Elementary Data 3%
8%42110,000185,7141,028
HubSpot hubspot.com
HubSpot Data Hub 5%
5%8368,0009,7762,276,428 company$83,92276
Melissa Data Quality Suite5%
Great Expectations greatexpectations.io3%8560,5004,9807930
Monte Carlo montecarlo.ai3%160135,00023,41224,468
Grafana Cloud grafana.com2%1832,4004084,520116
ZoomInfo Operations zoominfo.com2%92006,376,738$1,140120

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (datakitchen.io, g2.com, getorchestra.io, metaplane.dev, reddit.com). The first result for “best data observability platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best data observability platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data quality tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top data quality and observability platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data observability platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a data observability platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data quality and observability platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceMelissa Data Quality SuiteChanged
Three alternativesAtaccama ONE, Metaplane, OpenRefine
Metaplane
Five alternativesBigeye, Coalesce Quality, Elementary, Monte Carlo, Soda
Metaplane
Three alternativesOpenObserve, Sifflet, Soda
no first choiceagainst: Bigeye, Collibra Data Quality & Observability, Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo, New Relic, Soda Data
GPT-5.4 miniMetaplane
One alternativeBigeye
against: Monte Carlo
Great ExpectationsChanged
One alternativeOpenRefine
Soda
Two alternativesBigeye, Great Expectations
against: Anomalo, Monte Carlo
Great Expectations, Sodaagainst: Bigeye, IBM Databand, Monte Carlono first choiceagainst: Acceldata, Anomalo, Bigeye, IBM Databand, Informatica Data Quality & Observability, Monte Carlo
Gemini 3.5 FlashMetaplane
Three alternativesDatafold, Elementary Data, Soda
against: Anomalo, Monte Carlo
InsycleChanged
Five alternativesApollo.io, HubSpot Breeze, NeverBounce, OpenRefine, ZeroBounce
Elementary Data, Metaplane
Three alternativesDatifold, Great Expectations, Soda
against: Acceldata, Monte Carlo
Elementary Data
Two alternativesMetaplane, Soda
against: Acceldata, Anomalo, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
Elementary Data, Metaplaneagainst: Acceldata, Anomalo, Databand, Monte Carloagainst: Acceldata, Alation, Anomalo, Bigeye, Collibra Data Quality & Observability, Databand, IBM InfoSphere QualityStage, Informatica Data Quality, Monte Carlo
Perplexity SonarMetaplane
Two alternativesElementary, Soda
against: Grafana Cloud, Monte Carlo, New Relic
Melissa Data Quality SuiteChanged
Five alternativesCognism, Great Expectations, Soda, WinPure Clean & Match, ZoomInfo OperationsOS
Metaplane, Soda
Four alternativesAnomalo, Atlan Data Quality Studio, Elementary, Great Expectations
against: Monte Carlo
Metaplane
Two alternativesGrafana Cloud, New Relic
against: Datadog Data Observability, SigNoz
no first choiceagainst: Acceldata, Ataccama ONE, Bigeye, Collibra Data Quality & Observability, Datadog Data Observability, IBM Databand, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Metaplane, Monte Carlo, Soda
Grok 4.20Soda
Three alternativesElementary, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
against: Acceldata, Datadog Data Observability, Dynatrace, New Relic, Sifflet
Melissa Data Quality SuiteChanged
Three alternativesHubSpot Data Hub, Insycle, Traction Complete
against: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OpenRefine, SAS Viya
Elementary, Soda
Three alternativesDatafold, Great Expectations, Metaplane
against: Acceldata, Anomalo, Bigeye, Collibra Data Quality & Observability, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Monte Carlo
Grafana Cloud
Three alternativesApica Ascent, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus
against: Anomalo, Datadog Data Observability, IBM Databand, Monte Carlo, New Relic
Monte Carlo, Soda
Two alternativesBigeye, Great Expectations
against: Acceldata, Collibra Data Quality & Observability
against: Acceldata, Anomalo, Bigeye, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo, Sifflet
Mistral SmallMetaplane
Three alternativesGrafana Cloud, Soda, Soda Core
against: Bigeye, Elementary, Monte Carlo
HubSpot Data Hub, ZoomInfo OperationsChanged
One alternativeOpenRefine
Metaplane, Soda
Two alternativesGrafana Cloud, SigNoz
against: Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo
Metaplane, Soda
Two alternativesGrafana Cloud, New Relic
no first choiceagainst: Acceldataagainst: Acceldata, Bigeye, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
DeepSeek V4 FlashMetaplane
One alternativeSoda
against: Bigeye, Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo
InsycleChanged
One alternativeProspeo
against: OpenRefine
Metaplane, Soda
Two alternativesElementary, Great Expectations
against: Monte Carlo
Elementary, Metaplane, Soda
One alternativeOpenObserve
against: Datadog Data Observability
Elementary
Three alternativesDataKitchen, Great Expectations, Soda Core
against: Anomalo, Bigeye, Monte Carlo, Soda
against: Acryl Data, Anomalo, Bigeye, Datadog Data Observability, Dynatrace, IBM Databand, Monte Carlo
Llama 4 MaverickMetaplane
Three alternativesNew Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, Uptrace
no first choiceChangedno first choiceMetaplane
Three alternativesBigeye, Grafana Cloud, Uptrace
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMetaplane
Two alternativesElementary Data, Soda
InsycleChanged
Four alternativesHubSpot Data Hub, Melissa Data Quality Suite, Prospeo, ZoomInfo Operations
Metaplane
One alternativeSoda
against: Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
New Relic
Five alternativesElementary Data, Grafana Cloud, SigNoz, Soda, Soda Core
no first choiceagainst: Bigeye, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo, Soda Coreagainst: Anomalo, Bigeye, Dash0, Datadog Data Observability, Great Expectations, IBM Databand, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Monte Carlo, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Data Services
Kimi K2Metaplane
Two alternativesElementary, Soda
against: Bigeye
InsycleChanged
Three alternativesHubSpot CRM, OpenRefine, WinPure Small Business Edition
Metaplane
Three alternativesBigeye, Elementary, Soda
against: Datadog Data Observability, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
Elementary
Four alternativesDataOps TestGen, Grafana Cloud, Metaplane, SigNoz
against: Bigeye, Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo, Soda Core
Bigeye, Metaplane
Three alternativesGreat Expectations, Monte Carlo, Soda
against: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Monte Carlo, Qlik, Talend
GLM 4.7 FlashXMetaplane, Soda
Two alternativesBigeye, Datadog Data Observability
against: Monte Carlo
WinPure Clean & MatchChanged
Five alternativesDataBlist, HubSpot Data Hub, Insycle, OpenRefine, Prospeo
Metaplane, Soda
Four alternativesDatafold, Elementary, Great Expectations, dbt tests
against: DataKitchen TestGen, Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo
Soda Core
Two alternativesOpenObserve, groundcover
against: Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo
Metaplane, Soda
Three alternativesBigeye, Great Expectations, Monte Carlo
against: Ataccama ONE, Collibra Data Quality & Observability, Grafana Cloud, IBM InfoSphere, Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Monte Carlo Data
MiniMax M2.5Metaplane, Monte Carlo
Two alternativesGrafana Cloud, Soda
HubSpot Data Hub, ZeroBounceChanged
Two alternativesClearout, Databene
Metaplane, Soda
Five alternativesDatafold, Elementary, Great Expectations, Sifflet, dbt tests
against: Anomalo, Bigeye, Monte Carlo
Metaplane
One alternativeGreat Expectations
against: Datadog Data Observability, Dynatrace, New Relic, Soda
no first choiceagainst: Anomalo, Bigeye, Datadog Data Observability, Monte Carlo
GPT-6 LunaMetaplane
Three alternativesDatadog Data Observability, Elementary, Soda
against: Monte Carlo
HubSpot Data Hub, InsycleChanged
One alternativeDedupely
Elementary, Soda, dbt tests
Two alternativesDatadog Data Observability, Great Expectations
against: Monte Carlo
Metaplane
One alternativeElementary
Metaplane
Two alternativesElementary, Soda
against: Monte Carlo
against: Bigeye, Metaplane, Monte Carlo, Soda, Soda Core
Muse Glimmer 30BMetaplane
Three alternativesBigeye, Elementary, Soda
against: Monte Carlo
InsycleChanged
Three alternativesDedupely, Metaplane, Prospeo
Metaplane, Soda
Two alternativesElementary, Great Expectations
against: Bigeye, Monte Carlo
Metaplane, Soda
Two alternativesDataKitchen DataOps Observability / DataOps TestGen, Monte Carlo Start
no first choiceagainst: Ataccama ONE, Bigeye, Datadog Data Observability, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Metaplane, Monte Carlo
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:18no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:39yes24 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:13no015 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:01yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:02yes516 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:08yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:01yes2123 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:10yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:02yes1047 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:59yes2431 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:30yes1557 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:30yes551 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:58yes516 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:36yes1317 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:38yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:04yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:14no011 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:40yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:05yes56 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:38yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:18yes2323 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:41yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:16yes525 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:30yes1548 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:10yes1085 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:41no09 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:27yes311 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:08yes2030 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:11yes1614 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:12yes59 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:18yes323 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:04yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:59yes1017 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:04yes108 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:15yes2444 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:09yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:07yes1435 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:18yes2061 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:36yes2540 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:20yes2567 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:48yes521 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:09yes1531 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:25yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:03yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:33yes1324 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:00yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:41yes510 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:18yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:09yes2140 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:43yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:20yes533 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:54yes1525 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:17yes2478 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:21yes1032 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:52yes28 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:02yes1426 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:32no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:52no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:04no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:40yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:15yes1319 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:05no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:58yes2341 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:50yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:57no026 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:50yes981 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:31yes1593 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:50no015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:16yes516 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:44yes1422 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:34yes1911 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:50yes25 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:47no019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:20yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:34yes1915 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:51yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:08yes2333 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:28yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:47yes536 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:47yes2248 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:12yes2432 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:10yes2545 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:40yes425 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:24yes1530 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Collibra read as Collibra Data Quality & Observability
Datadog read as Datadog Data Observability
Grafana read as Grafana Cloud
HubSpot read as HubSpot Data Hub
HubSpot (Free Tier) read as HubSpot Data Hub
IBM Data Observability by Databand read as IBM Databand
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Soda.io read as Soda
WinPure read as WinPure Clean & Match
ZoomInfo read as ZoomInfo Operations
Unresolved, counted raw
Atlan Data Quality Studio
Bouncer
Clearout
DataBlist
DataKitchen DataOps Observability / DataOps TestGen
DataObservability
Databene
Datifold
MobyDQ
Monte Carlo Start
Oppora
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Data Services
Soda Data
WinPure Small Business Edition
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Data maskingData virtualization →