Index › IT › Data platform › Data catalogs › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Data catalogs and governance for small business buyers

Asked as “data catalog”, and as “data governance platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 64 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Secoda 19%
19OpenMetadata19Secoda16Select Star47others

19% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secoda (19%) replaces OpenMetadata (18% then, 19% now), 0 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Secoda leads at 19%, replacing OpenMetadata, which led at 18% and stands at 19% now: 0 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Secoda19%0%42accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 16% → 19%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 19%
02OpenMetadata19%11%57accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 19%
03Select Star16%4%27accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%
04Atlan8%16%51accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%
05DataHub6%24%46accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
06Microsoft Purview6%20%35accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 6%
07OvalEdge2%0%15accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%
08Collate2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Snowflake Horizon2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Databricks Unity Catalog2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Collibra2%88%58criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%96%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16Alation0%84%49criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
14Apache Atlas0%53%17criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13Amundsen0%42%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12data.world0%23%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
C08
09
10
11
12
A13
A14
15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Secoda19%
02OpenMetadata19%
03Select Star16%
04Atlan8%
05DataHub6%
06Microsoft Purview6%
07OvalEdge2%
08Collate2%
09Snowflake Horizon2%
10Databricks Unity Catalog2%
11Collibra2%
12data.world0%
13Amundsen0%
14Apache Atlas0%
15Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud0%
16Alation0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Collibra
88%
51 of 58 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 25 hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Collibra cost $100,000+ but may be overkill." ... "repeatedly described as an enterprise governance platform with complexity and cost that can be prohibitive for smaller organizations” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Alation
84%
41 of 49 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 23 hard negative
“Cons: High price point for small businesses, Steep learning curve for advanced features" ... "these are almost never right for a small team” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
96%
22 of 23 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“listed among criticized challengers with 89% negative labels ... "Legacy platforms like Collibra and Informatica run $130,000 to over $500,000 a year"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Apache Atlas
53%
9 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“requires real technical expertise to configure and maintain, and users increasingly describe it as heavyweight” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 860 links across 155 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 24 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Atlan48 answers · 99 citations · 14 models
31 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OvalEdge26 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G223 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Decube20 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Basedash17 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · ER/Studio15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data catalog”, “data catalog”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Secoda secoda.co19%70720930,3480
OpenMetadata open-metadata.org19%1082,900322,73714
Select Star selectstar.com16%404804966840
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Purview 6%, Microsoft Purview DLP 2%, Microsoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premium 2%
9%5142,240,000403,136
Atlan atlan.com8%1575,40043241,14784
DataHub datahub.com6%1115,4002757,220798
dbt Docs getdbt.com3%475,75312
OvalEdge ovaledge.com2%43260312,6881
Collate getcollate.io2%217
Snowflake snowflake.com
Snowflake Horizon 2%
2%41368,00037,077718,749 company118

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (atlan.com). The first result for “best data catalog” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best data catalog for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data governance platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top data catalogs and governance platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data catalog for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a data catalog. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data catalogs and governance platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Secoda
Three alternativesAcryl DataHub, Atlan, Select Star
no first choiceChangedDataedo
Seven alternativesApache Atlas, Ataccama ONE, Atlan, OpenMetadata, Secoda, Select Star, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Secoda
Five alternativesAmundsen, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Select Star, data.world
no first choiceagainst: Apache Atlas, BigID, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview
GPT-5.4 miniAtlan, Dataplex, Google Cloud Data Catalog
Two alternativesDataHub, OpenMetadata
against: Collibra, DataGalaxy
AtlanChanged
Three alternativesCollibra, Microsoft Purview, OvalEdge
Atlan
Five alternativesAlation, Collibra, DataHub, OpenMetadata, Secoda
DataHub
Four alternativesCollate, DataGalaxy, OpenMetadata, Secoda
against: Google Cloud Data Catalog
no first choiceagainst: Alation, Atlan, Collibra
Gemini 3.5 FlashSecoda, Select Star, dbt Docs
Five alternativesAWS Glue Data Catalog, CastorDoc, Databricks Unity Catalog, OpenMetadata, Snowflake Horizon
against: Alation, Collibra
InsycleChanged
Four alternativesDataedo, OpenMetadata, Secoda, Syncari
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Secoda
Four alternativesAtlan, CastorDoc, OpenMetadata, Select Star
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
OpenMetadata, dbt Docs
Six alternativesAWS Glue Data Catalog, Decube, GCP Dataplex, Secoda, Select Star, Snowflake Horizon
against: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Secoda, Select Star
Three alternativesElementary Data, OpenMetadata, dbt Docs
against: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, DataHub, IBM Knowledge Catalog
against: Alation, Amundsen, Apache Atlas, Collibra, DataHub, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog, Oracle Enterprise Metadata Management, SAP Data Intelligence, SAP Master Data Governance
Perplexity SonarSecoda
Four alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata
against: Alation, Collibra
OvalEdgeChanged
Five alternativesApache Atlas, Atlan, BigID, Microsoft Purview, data.world
against: Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Secoda
Seven alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, OvalEdge, Snowflake Horizon
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
OpenMetadata
Four alternativesCollate, Microsoft Purview, Secoda, Select Star
against: Alation, Atlan, Collibra
no first choiceagainst: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Alation, Apache Atlas, BigID, Collibra, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Informatica Cloud Data Governance & Catalog, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Securiti, ServiceNow Data Catalog, Snowflake Horizon, data.world
Grok 4.20Select Star
Five alternativesDataHub, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Secoda, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, SAS Viya
Microsoft PurviewChanged
One alternativeAtlan
against: Alation, Apache Atlas, Collibra
Secoda
Five alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Microsoft Purview, Select Star, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
OpenMetadata
Three alternativesDataHub, Microsoft Purview, Secoda
against: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, Select Star
Select Star
Three alternativesAtlan, Microsoft Purview, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra
against: Alation, Apache Atlas, Ataccama ONE, BigID, Collibra, IBM watsonx.data intelligence, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview
Mistral SmallSelect Star
Three alternativesAtlan, OpenMetadata, Secoda
Collibra, EgnyteChanged
Two alternativesClaravine, OvalEdge
Atlan, Microsoft Purview, data.world
Three alternativesDatabricks Unity Catalog, OpenMetadata, Snowflake Horizon
against: Alation, Collibra
OpenMetadata
Three alternativesAWS Glue Data Catalog, Collate, Tableau Catalog
no first choiceagainst: Alation, Ataccama ONE, Collibra, Informatica CDGC, Microsoft Purview, data.world
DeepSeek V4 FlashSelect Star
Four alternativesDataHub, Dataedo, OpenMetadata, Secoda
against: Alation, Collibra, DataHub Cloud, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Two alternativesAtlan, OpenMetadata
against: Alation, BigID, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, data.world
Collate, Secoda
Three alternativesAtlan, DataHub, OpenMetadata
against: Alation, Amundsen, Collibra
OpenMetadata
Two alternativesDataHub, Dataedo
against: Alation, Apache Atlas, Collibra
Secoda, Select Star
One alternativeAtlan
against: Alation, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OpenMetadata
against: Alation, Apache Atlas, Atlan, Azure Purview, Collibra, DataHub, IBM watsonx.governance, Immuta, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OneTrust DataGovernance, OpenMetadata
Llama 4 MaverickOpenMetadata
Four alternativesAtlan, OvalEdge, Secoda, Select Star
no first choiceChangedno first choiceSelect Star
Five alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog
no first choiceagainst: Collibra, Microsoft Purview
Qwen 3.7 FlashSecoda
Five alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata
against: Amazon Glue / AWS Lake Formation, Collibra
Microsoft PurviewChanged
Five alternativesHubSpot, Microsoft Power Automate, OpenMetadata, Salesforce, SharePoint
against: Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Atlan, OpenMetadataagainst: Alation, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudOpenMetadata
Five alternativesCollate, DataHub Cloud, Microsoft Purview, Select Star, Tableau
Atlan, CastorDoc
One alternativeOpenMetadata
against: Alation, Collibra, DataHub
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica CDGC, Oracle, SAP
Kimi K2Select Star
Four alternativesCollate, DataHub, OpenMetadata, Secoda
against: Alation, Collibra
Microsoft PurviewChanged
Three alternativesAtlan, OvalEdge, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Select Star
Four alternativesAtlan, CastorDoc, DataHub, OpenMetadata
against: Alation, Amundsen, Collibra
OpenMetadata
Three alternativesCollate, DataHub, Microsoft Purview
Atlan, Secoda
One alternativeDataHub
against: Alation, Apache Atlas, Collibra, DataHub, IBM InfoSphere, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, OpenMetadata, SAP Master Data Governance, SAS Data Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXSecoda
Five alternativesDataHub, Dawiso, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Select Star
against: Alation, Collibra
HubSpot Smart CRMChanged
Six alternativesDataBuck, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Microsoft Purview, Salesforce, Traction Complete, ZoomInfo Operations
against: Collibra Data Governance Center
Atlan
Four alternativesDataHub, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Secoda
against: Alation, Collibra
DataHub, OpenMetadata
Three alternativesApache Atlas, Atlan, OvalEdge
against: Alation, Collibra, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Apache Atlas, Collibra, DataHub, Databricks, IBM watsonx.data, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OneTrust, OpenMetadata, Oracle Enterprise Manager, SAP Master Data Governance, Transcend, Twilio Segment, Unanet GovCon
MiniMax M2.5Secoda
Three alternativesCatalog, DataHub, Unity Catalog OSS
against: Alation, Collibra
DemandToolsChanged
One alternativeClaravine
against: Collibra
Atlan, Secoda
Four alternativesAmundsen, Castor, Stemma, data.world
against: Alation, Collibra
DataHub, OpenMetadata
Three alternativesAWS Glue Data Catalog, Accurity, Atlan
Atlan
Three alternativesOvalEdge, Select Star, Stemma
against: Alation, Collibra
nothing named
GPT-6 LunaSecoda
Two alternativesDataHub, OpenMetadata
Microsoft PurviewChanged
One alternativeSecoda
Secoda, Select Star
Five alternativesAtlan, DataHub, Databricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata
against: Collibra
OpenMetadata
Two alternativesDataHub OSS, dbt Docs
Databricks Unity Catalog, Snowflake Horizon
Three alternativesDataHub, OpenMetadata, Secoda
against: Alation, Amundsen, Atlan, Collibra, DataHub, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata
Muse Glimmer 30BSecoda, Select Star
Three alternativesAmundsen, DataHub, OpenMetadata
Microsoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business PremiumChanged
One alternativeCYTRIO
Atlan, Secoda
Three alternativesCollate, DataHub, OpenMetadata
against: Amundsen, Collibra
Collate, DataHub, DataHub Cloud, OpenMetadata
One alternativeApache Atlas
no first choice
Three alternativesDatabricks Unity Catalog, Microsoft Purview, Snowflake Horizon
against: Alation, Atlan, Collibra, Informatica CDGC, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:36yes1610 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:50yes15 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:42no011 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:25yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:04yes1415 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:36yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:45yes2131 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:03yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:30yes536 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:47yes1938 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:50yes2542 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:31yes1541 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:24yes218 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:53yes2226 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:32no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:39yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:25no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:03yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:11yes99 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:54yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:23yes2042 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:06yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:47no033 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:40yes2527 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:14yes1738 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:50yes523 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:37yes217 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:03yes1526 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:27yes1710 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:50yes27 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:37no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:07yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:25yes2420 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:38yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:20yes2244 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:59yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:15yes1044 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:22yes1953 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:00yes1754 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:37yes1022 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:04yes738 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:57yes1126 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:27yes189 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:54yes56 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:54yes1015 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:21yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:37yes1514 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:24yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:39yes2428 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:09yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:56yes944 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:05yes519 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:06yes23142 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:19yes515 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:02yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:47yes1419 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:50no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:34no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:10yes821 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:55yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:30yes1216 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:50no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:54yes2544 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:22yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:55yes532 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:49yes1525 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:33yes9173 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:19yes1025 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:07yes424 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:50yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:37yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:23yes67 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:21no017 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:29yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:44yes1515 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:38yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:25yes2543 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:09yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:54yes537 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:54yes2449 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:20yes2333 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:09no026 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:56yes419 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:55yes1626 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud
Snowflake read as Snowflake Horizon
Snowflake (Horizon / Schema Browser) read as Snowflake Horizon
Snowflake Horizon Catalog read as Snowflake Horizon
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Glue / AWS Lake Formation
CYTRIO
Catalog (formerly CastorDoc)
Colibra
Data Catalog in Fabric
DataHub Cloud
DataHub OSS
Google Cloud's Dataplex
HubSpot Smart CRM
OneTrust DataGovernance
Oracle Enterprise Manager
Snowflake Catalog
Snowflake's Horizon
Snowflake's features
Tableau Catalog
Tableau's catalog
Transcend
Unanet GovCon
Unity Catalog OSS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← AI governanceData masking →