Index › IT › Data platform › Data catalogs › Atlan vs Secoda
Data catalogs and governance · November 2026 Edition

Atlan vs Secoda

Eight of fourteen models named Atlan first on the direct prompt; seven named Secoda. Atlan was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Secoda by thirteen and Atlan carries 57 labels and Secoda 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Atlan

endorsed leader

Named in five categories this edition.

Secoda

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share35%13%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels5726A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Atlan reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Atlan vs OpenMetadata · Atlan vs DataHub · Atlan vs Microsoft Purview

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data catalogs and governance page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AtlanFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSecoda
Direct87
Paraphrase90
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Atlan
Scale-constrained51
Negative311 against Secoda
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Atlan and Secoda were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 178 answers naming Atlan and the 81 naming Secoda. In those answers Secoda took the first choice sixteen times and Atlan eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Atlan and Secoda stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Atlan Secoda first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Atlan on the left and Secoda on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Atlan and Secoda stood in it.

Both were the first choice

2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallAtlan, Secoda
Qwen 3.7 FlashAtlan, Secoda alternatives: Coalesce Catalog, Microsoft Purview

Atlan first, Secoda an alternative

6 of 14 modelsSecoda was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniAtlan alternatives: Alation, DataHub, Dataplex, Microsoft Purview, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog
Gemini 3.5 FlashAtlan alternatives: AWS Glue Data Catalog, Acryl Data, CastorDoc, Databricks Unity Catalog, OpenMetadata, Secoda, Select Star, Snowflake Horizon
Perplexity SonarAtlan alternatives: Collibra, Microsoft Purview, OvalEdge, Secoda
Grok 4.20Atlan alternatives: DataHub, OpenMetadata, Secoda, Select Star
GLM 4.7 FlashXAtlan alternatives: DataGalaxy, Dawiso, OpenMetadata, Zeenea
GPT-6 LunaAtlan alternatives: OpenMetadata, Secoda, Your platform's built-in catalog

Secoda first, Atlan an alternative

5 of 14 modelsAtlan was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashOvalEdge, Secoda alternatives: Atlan, DataHub, Select Star
Llama 4 MaverickSecoda alternatives: Atlan, data.world
Kimi K2CastorDoc, Secoda alternatives: Atlan, Select Star
MiniMax M2.5Secoda alternatives: Atlan
Muse Glimmer 30BSecoda alternatives: Dataedo, OvalEdge, data.world

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Secoda leads by eleven points.
Secoda19%#1 of 16
Atlan8%#4 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Atlan leads at mid-market.
Atlan35%#1 of 16
Secoda13%#3 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Atlan leads by twenty-one points.
Atlan23%#2 of 11
Secoda2%#8 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Atlan

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“What to Avoid ... Enterprise tools like Collibra, Alation, or Atlan — Excellent products, but typically cost $50K–$200K+ annually.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid expensive enterprise tools like Collibra ($100k+/year), Alation, and Atlan at this stage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“far more practical than paid tools like Alation, Collibra, or Atlan” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Consider OpenMetadata (if you have engineering capacity) or Atlan (a modern, lighter alternative often praised for better UX and AI features) to start.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“If you are multi-cloud / Snowflake / Databricks / modern SaaS data and want fast adoption with AI context and a business-friendly catalog: Atlan.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Modern / Active Metadata Platforms (Strongest fit for ~500 employees): *Examples:* Atlan, Select Star, Secoda, CastorDoc, DataHub (Cloud/Acryl Data).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Secoda

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“mentioned as being "criticized challengers" or having negative reviews” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want the cheapest, fastest adoption with AI-assisted search, Secoda is the most common mid-market recommendation today.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Secoda is frequently highlighted as the strongest recommendation for most mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Strongest fit for ~500 employees): *Examples:* Atlan, Select Star, Secoda, CastorDoc, DataHub” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.