Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Products › Amazon RDS · November 2026 Edition
Managed relational databases · Ranked

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service from AWS, offered with a choice of seven database engines · aws.amazon.com ↗

#1Best rank (mid-market)
14/14Models named it
51First choices
39Warnings
November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.
Ranked inManaged relational databases #1 mid-market
What AI models recommend

Leads at mid-market. Ranked 2 of 99 for enterprise buyers.

The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.

Small business
Asked for a small B2B company
#2 of 77 named for small business
Share of first picks24%

Supabase is first at 29%.

Mid-marketStrongest
Asked for a mid-market B2B company
#1 of 82 named for mid-market
Share of first picks51%

Ranked first. Next is Azure SQL Database at 9%. 12 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.

Enterprise
Asked for an enterprise B2B company
#2 of 99 named for enterprise
Share of first picks20%

Amazon Aurora is first at 43%.

Why models recommend it

“AWS RDS or Azure SQL Database are solid default choices due to their maturity, reliability, compliance certifications, and strong support ecosystems”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Amazon's Relational Database Service offers a free tier for the first 12 months... AWS Lightsail is also budget-friendly for smaller workloads.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Broad engine choice and familiar database behavior... You're already on AWS, want a conventional engine, or need Oracle, SQL Server, or Db2.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, and Azure SQL Database are the natural starting points for conventional managed relational workloads”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice

What gives them pause

“Some models explicitly recommend avoiding RDS for production core systems unless absolutely necessary.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Some models explicitly recommend avoiding RDS for production core systems unless absolutely necessary.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“AWS RDS – hidden markup, vendor lock‑in, limited operational control.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“Why avoid the "Big Three" (AWS, Azure, Google)?”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Amazon RDS, over the 200 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

ProductNamed togetherPicked instead
Google Cloud SQL
1645Compare →
Azure SQL Database
1355Compare →
Amazon Aurora
10513Compare →
Supabase
7926Compare →
Neon
579Compare →
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
4911Compare →
PlanetScale
483View →
AlloyDB for PostgreSQL
290View →
CockroachDB
260View →
Google Cloud Spanner
220View →

What the models named instead of Amazon RDS →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

At a glance

Stated on Amazon RDS's own site, not checked by Gane.

Also from Amazon
Amazon API Gateway, Amazon API Gateway HTTP APIs, Amazon AppStream 2.0, Amazon Athena, Amazon Athena Federated Query, Amazon Aurora and 48 more
Visit aws.amazon.com ↗

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Amazon RDS came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 164 of the 200 answers that named Amazon RDS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aws.amazon.comIts own site81
gane.ai/indexpublisher (Gane)77
cloud.google.com47
docs.aws.amazon.comIts own site46
learn.microsoft.com41
g2.com38
github.com37
docs.cloud.google.com31
northflank.com31
azure.microsoft.com30

255 of the 459 domain citations in answers naming Amazon RDS came from a third party's page. Seventy-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.

Pages cited

aws.amazon.com/rds51
gane.ai/index/it/it-data/managed-relational-databases/smb34
cloud.google.com/sql29
aws.amazon.com/rds/pricing23
peerspot.com/products/comparisons/amazon-rds_vs_google-cloud-sql_vs_microsoft-azure-sql-da21
gane.ai/index/it/it-data/managed-relational-databases/enterprise20
github.com/PatrickWiloak/cloud-data-ai-security-zero-to-hero/blob/main/resources/service-c20
guideflow.com/blog/dbaas-providers20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Amazon RDS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionWarningLabels
Claude Haiku 4.540015
GPT-5.4 mini21014
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar31015
Grok 4.2023016
Mistral Small31116
DeepSeek V4 Flash21115
Llama 4 Maverick40015
Qwen 3.7 Flash21126
Kimi K211125
GLM 4.7 FlashX21216
MiniMax M2.551006
GPT-6 Luna30205
Muse Glimmer 30B21216

What it publishes

Addresses on aws.amazon.com
280,316
subdomains included
Content
42,799
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,345
Product · Integration
3,213 · 49,021
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog27,117undatedAPI gateways, ETL
Glossary or explainer6,521undatedETL, MFA
Case study2,47602019-03-01WAF, Observability
Webinar or virtual event2,057162026-07-01Streaming, API gateways
Comparison1,52102025-09-01Object storage, ETL
Conference or event1,48202025-11-01Vector databases
Report or ebook1,090162026-09-01WAF, NoSQL
Podcast or video351undatedETL
Template or tool15002025-05-01
News or press34undated

Most recent

Events in person

The twelve months before September 28, 2026

As the event pages on aws.amazon.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aws.amazon.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ETL (168); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 28, 2026.