Secure code training
Asked as “secure code training platform”, and as “developer security training”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · SecureFlag 12%
38Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform12SecureFlag08SafeStack Academy42others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform (38%) replaces SecureFlag (26% then, 12% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform leads at 38%, replacing SecureFlag, which led at 26% and stands at 12% now: 26 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SecureFlag25%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 26% → 25%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform (38%) replaces SecureFlag (26% then, 12% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%Clear leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
SecureFlag25%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 26% → 25%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform (38%) replaces SecureFlag (26% then, 12% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform62%Clear leader▲+25Since October 2026: 37% → 62%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%24%63endorsed leader▲+20Since October 2026: 18% → 38%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 38%
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%24%63endorsed leader▲+20Since October 2026: 18% → 38%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 38%02SecureFlag12%7%41accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 26% → 12%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.26% → 12%
SecureFlag12%7%41accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 26% → 12%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.26% → 12%03
Snyk Learn8%5%19accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
Snyk Learn8%5%19accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%04
SafeStack Academy8%6%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%
SafeStack Academy8%6%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 12% → 8%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 8%05
Security Journey2%16%32accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Security Journey2%16%32accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%06
AppSecEngineer2%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
AppSecEngineer2%0%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo2%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo2%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
Veracode Security Labs2%35%23criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Veracode Security Labs2%35%23criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Checkmarx Codebashing0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Checkmarx Codebashing0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Immersive Labs0%21%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Immersive Labs0%21%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Codebashing0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Codebashing0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10Kontra0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Avatao0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Security JourneySecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs AppSecEngineerSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Veracode Security LabsSecureFlag vs Snyk LearnSecureFlag vs SafeStack AcademySecureFlag vs Security JourneySecureFlag vs AppSecEngineerSecureFlag vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecureFlag vs Veracode Security LabsSnyk Learn vs SafeStack AcademySnyk Learn vs Security JourneySnyk Learn vs AppSecEngineerSnyk Learn vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSnyk Learn vs Veracode Security LabsSafeStack Academy vs Security JourneySafeStack Academy vs AppSecEngineerSafeStack Academy vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSafeStack Academy vs Veracode Security LabsSecurity Journey vs AppSecEngineerSecurity Journey vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoSecurity Journey vs Veracode Security LabsAppSecEngineer vs OWASP Secure Coding DojoAppSecEngineer vs Veracode Security LabsOWASP Secure Coding Dojo vs Veracode Security Labs
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708A09
K10
111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform38%02SecureFlag12%
SecureFlag12%03Snyk Learn8%
Snyk Learn8%04SafeStack Academy8%
SafeStack Academy8%05Security Journey2%
Security Journey2%06AppSecEngineer2%
AppSecEngineer2%07OWASP Secure Coding Dojo2%
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo2%08Veracode Security Labs2%
Veracode Security Labs2%09Avatao0%
10Kontra0%
11Codebashing0%
Codebashing0%12Immersive Labs0%
Immersive Labs0%13Checkmarx Codebashing0%
Checkmarx Codebashing0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform24%
15 of 63 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid premium platforms such as Secure Code Warrior or SecureFlag unless their stronger language coverage, labs, and analytics justify the higher cost” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Veracode Security Labs35%
8 of 23 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Paid enterprise platforms like Secure Code Warrior, Veracode Security Labs, or Immersive Labs are highly rated for depth and integration but often start at thousands of dollars annually” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Immersive Labs21%
4 of 19 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Excellent but built for larger enterprises; pricing is not transparent and usually expensive.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Checkmarx Codebashing25%
4 of 16 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 878 links across 138 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 93 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G233 answers · 73 citations · 13 models
vendor site · SourceForge31 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RansomLeak28 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Security Journey27 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Secure Code Warrior27 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)27 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SecureFlag26 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best secure code training platform”, “secure code training platform”, “secure code training platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform securecodewarrior.com | 38% | 179 | 2,802 | 7 | 2 | |||
| SecureFlag secureflag.com | 12% | 135 | 480 | 0 | 935 | $94 | 8 | 8 |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Learn 8% | 8% | 53 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| SafeStack Academy safestack.io | 8% | 41 | 10 | 0 | 92 | 1 | ||
| PortSwigger Web Security Academy portswigger.net | 4% | 13 | 1,000 | 4 | 89,623 | |||
| Secure Code Game | 4% | |||||||
| OWASP Security Shepherd owasp.org OWASP Secure Coding Dojo 2%, OWASP Security Shepherd 2% | 4% | 26 | 20 | 0 | 365,222 | 8 | ||
| SANS sans.org SANS Developer Security Training 2%, SANS Security Awareness 2% | 4% | 31 | 201,000 | 2,165,150 | 703,543 company | 81 | ||
| OpenSSF "Developing Secure Software" openssf.org OpenSSF "Developing Secure Software" 2%, OpenSSF (Open Source Security Foundation) Free Courses 2% | 4% | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Security Journey securityjourney.com | 2% | 103 | 390 | 8 | 1,490 | 10 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.secureflag.com, reddit.com, securecodewarrior.com, securityjourney.com). The first result for “best secure code training platform” is safestack.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best secure code training platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which developer security training would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top secure code training platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best secure code training platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a secure code training platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which secure code training platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformCode Review Lab, Wizerno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlag
Three alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Avatao, SecureFlagTwo alternatives
AppSecEngineer, CodebashingThree alternatives
Kontra, SecureFlag, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
Kontra, SafeStack Academy, Snyk LearnGPT-5.4 miniSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagagainst: CodebashingOWASP Security Shepherd, SecureFlag Small Businessno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AppSec Education Platform, Avatao, SafeStack Academy, SecureFlagThree alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, SANS Developer Security Training, SecureFlagTwo alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, SANS trainingGemini 3.5 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformPortSwigger Web Security Academyagainst: Immersive Labs, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Coursera, Hack The Box, KnowBe4, Proofpoint, Skillsoft, TryHackMe
Five alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Kontra, SecureFlag, Security JourneyFour alternatives
AppSecEngineer, PortSwigger Web Security Academy, SAFECode, Snyk LearnFour alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, PortSwigger Web Security Academy, Veracode Security LabsSix alternatives
Hacksplaining, Kontra Application Security, OWASP Juice Shop, OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, OpenSSF, TryHackMePerplexity SonarSecureFlagAppSecEngineerChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Coursera, SANS Developer Security TrainingSnyk Learnagainst: Coursera, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx Codebashing, SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security Labs
One alternative
Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformFour alternatives
Fraunhofer IEM, SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security LabsSix alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Checkmarx Codebashing, Codebashing, SecureFlag, Security Journey, VeracodeFive alternatives
Code Review Lab, OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, OpenSSF course, SafeStack Academy, Security JourneyGrok 4.20Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx Codebashing, Cybrary, HackerRank, Veracode Security LabsSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: KnowBe4, OWASP Secure Coding DojoOpenSSF (Open Source Security Foundation) Free Coursesagainst: Immersive Labs, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security LabsSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Coding Ninjas, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Three alternatives
SecureFlag, Security Journey, Snyk LearnFive alternatives
Avatao, Checkmarx Codebashing, Immersive Labs, KnowBe4, SANS Developer Security TrainingFive alternatives
Avatao, Codebashing, Immersive Labs, Kontra, Security JourneyFour alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, GitHub Secure Code Game, RansomLeak Free Training Materials, SafeStack AcademyThree alternatives
Immersive Labs, Security Journey, Veracode Security LabsMistral SmallSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSANS Developer Security Training, Veracode Security LabsChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSafeStack Academyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs
Two alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyOne alternative
Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformNine alternatives
Avatao, Codebashing, Immersive Labs, Kontra, OWASP Projects, RangeForce, SAFECode, SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
ImmersiveLabs, KnowBe4, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformDeepSeek V4 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformPortSwigger Web Security Academyagainst: Code Review Lab, Immersive Labs, SafeStack Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey, Veracode Security Labs
Two alternatives
SecureFlag, Security JourneyOne alternative
Security JourneySeven alternatives
Avatao, Codebashing, Kontra, SafeStack Academy, Security Journey, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
OWASP Application Security Curriculum, SecureFlagFour alternatives
Immersive Labs, SecureCodingHub, SecureFlag, Security JourneyLlama 4 MaverickSecureFlagno first choiceChangedno first choiceSafeStack Academyno first choiceagainst: Black Duck, Checkmarx Codebashing, Veracode Security Labs
Five alternatives
Avatao, ImmersiveLabs, KnowBe4, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
OWASP Security Knowledge Framework, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagQwen 3.7 FlashSecure Code Warrior Learning Platformagainst: Udemy for BusinessSecureFlagChangedSecureFlagagainst: Security JourneySafeStack Academyagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagno first choiceagainst: Coursera, HackTheBox, LinkedIn Learning, TryHackMe, Udemy, edX
Two alternatives
Hack The Box Academy, PluralsightThree alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Snyk LearnTwo alternatives
PortSwigger Web Security Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformThree alternatives
OWASP Security Shepherd, OpenOSS Labs, PortSwigger Web Security AcademyKimi K2Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSafeStack Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformChangedagainst: Immersive LabsSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSnyk Learnno first choiceagainst: KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs
Three alternatives
Avatao, Immersive Labs, Security JourneyOne alternative
KnowBe4Six alternatives
Codebashing, Hack The Box, Immersive Labs, PortSwigger Web Security Academy, SecureFlag, Security JourneyThree alternatives
OpenSSF "Developing Secure Software", SafeStack Academy, SecureFlagGLM 4.7 FlashXSecureFlagSANS Security AwarenessChangedSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, SecureFlagOpenSSF Education, Secure Code Gameagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platformno first choiceagainst: Black Duck (Coverity) Secure Coding, Code for All, Coding Dojo, Kable Academy, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Veracode Security Labs
Three alternatives
AppSecEngineer, Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyThree alternatives
Coursera, OWASP resources, UdemyEight alternatives
Avatao, Codebashing, Immersive Labs, OWASP Labs, Security Compass SSP, Security Journey, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsFour alternatives
AhaSlides Secure Coding Fundamentals Template, ImmersiveLabs, KnowBe4, SAFECode TrainingMiniMax M2.5Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecurity Journey, Snyk LearnChangedno first choiceOpenSSF "Developing Secure Software"no first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Two alternatives
SafeStack Academy, Security JourneyThree alternatives
OpenSSF Secure Software Fundamentals, Security Compass, Veracode Security LabsTwo alternatives
GitHub - Ransomleak Training Application Security, OWASP Secure Coding DojoGPT-6 LunaSecureFlagSecureFlagHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneySnyk Learnno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security JourneyFour alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, PortSwigger's free interactive Web Security Academy, SANS Developer Security Training, Secure Code Warrior Learning PlatformTwo alternatives
SecureFlag, Snyk LearnTwo alternatives
OWASP Secure Coding Dojo, SecureFlagMuse Glimmer 30BSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformHeldSecure Code Warrior Learning PlatformOWASP Secure Coding Dojo, Secure Code Gameagainst: Security Journeyno first choiceagainst: Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform, Security Journey
Two alternatives
Checkmarx Codebashing, SafeStack AcademyTwo alternatives
SANS Developer Security Training, Veracode Security LabsSix alternatives
Immersive Labs, SANS SEC522, SecureFlag, Security Journey, Snyk Learn, Veracode Security LabsThree alternatives
OpenSSF Education - Linux Foundation free courses, SecureCodeCards, Veracode Security Labs Community EditionBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 14 | 81 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 24 | 159 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 17 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:22 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 12 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:44 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:56 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 17 | 96 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:31 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:51 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:59 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:22 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:59 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:38 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 21 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:32 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:03 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 24 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 15 | 108 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OWASP read as OWASP resources
SANS read as SANS Developer Security Training
SANS Institute Developer Security Training read as SANS Developer Security Training
SANS developer training read as SANS Developer Security Training
SafeStack read as SafeStack Academy
Secure Code Warrior read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Secure Code Warrior (SCW) read as Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform
Veracode Secure Code Training read as Veracode Security Labs
Unresolved, counted raw
AhaSlides Secure Coding Fundamentals Template
AppSec Education Platform (HackEDU)
BSG's Developer Security Training (OWASP & Secure Coding)
Black Duck (Coverity) Secure Coding
Coding Ninjas
Cybrary.it Secure Coding Course
Fraunhofer IEM
Fraunhofer IEM's Software Security Training for Developer
GitHub Secure Code Game
GitHub's AppSec Training repository
HackTheBox
HackerRank
Kable Academy (Cybersecurity Part‑Time)
NIST-listed free content
OWASP Labs (Juice Shop, crAPI, Security Shepherd)
OWASP Projects
OWASP Security Knowledge Framework
OffSec Web Development
OpenOSS Labs
OpenSSF (Open Source Security Foundation) Free Courses
OpenSSF Education
OpenSSF Education - Linux Foundation free courses
OpenSSF course
OpenSSF courses
PortSwigger's free interactive Web Security Academy
RansomLeak Free Training Materials
SAFECode Training
SAFECode Training Resources
SANS SEC522
SANS training
SD Elements
SecureCodeCards
SecureFlag Small Business
Security Knowledge Framework
SecurityJourney
Skillsoft
Udemy for Business
edX
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.