November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Developer platform › Artifact registries · November 2026 Edition

Artifact and container registries

Asked as “artifact repository”, and as “container registry”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · JFrog Artifactory 22%
28Sonatype Nexus Repository22JFrog Artifactory08Amazon ECR42others

28% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 22% → 28%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Sonatype Nexus Repository held the lead, +6 points on 22%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Sonatype Nexus Repository28%5%38accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 22% → 28%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 28%
02JFrog Artifactory22%14%57accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 14% → 22%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 22%
03Amazon ECR8%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%
04GitHub Packages5%9%64accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 5%
05Harbor5%5%42accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 5%
06Azure Container Registry5%6%35accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 5%
07Google Artifact Registry Lab in the set5%10%41accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 5%
08Cloudsmith3%4%26accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 8% → 3%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 3%
09Amazon Elastic Container Registry3%0%13accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 10% → 3%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 3%
10Sonatype Lifecycle3%0%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
11GitLab Package Registry2%10%21accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Docker Hub0%52%33criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14AWS ECR0%25%12criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13Azure Artifacts0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12AWS CodeArtifact0%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Artifact Registry is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
A03
G04
05
A06
G07
08
A09
10
11
A12
A13
A14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Sonatype Nexus Repository28%
02JFrog Artifactory22%
03Amazon ECR8%
04GitHub Packages5%
05Harbor5%
06Azure Container Registry5%
07Google Artifact Registry5%
08Cloudsmith3%
09Amazon Elastic Container Registry3%
10Sonatype Lifecycle3%
11GitLab Package Registry2%
12AWS CodeArtifact0%
13Azure Artifacts0%
14AWS ECR0%
15Docker Hub0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Docker Hub
52%
17 of 33 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Unverified Public Registries (e.g., Standard Docker Hub) ... they pose high risks because they allow anyone to push images.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
GitHub Packages
9%
6 of 64 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“public registries like Docker Hub, GitHub Container Registry (GHCR), or Google Artifact Registry are convenient, they pose high risks” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
JFrog Artifactory
14%
8 of 57 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid JFrog for mid-market unless you specifically need its 60+ format support” Kimi K2, direct prompt
Google Artifact Registry
10%
4 of 41 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“public registries like Docker Hub, GitHub Container Registry (GHCR), or Google Artifact Registry ... they pose high risks” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 759 links across 193 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 50 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · GitHub31 answers · 62 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sonatype20 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · JFrog17 answers · 26 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CloudRepo15 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Harness14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “artifact and container registries”, “artifact repository”, “best artifact repository”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Sonatype sonatype.com
Sonatype Nexus Repository 28%, Sonatype Lifecycle 3%
32%1217203871,814 company$1,87975
JFrog Artifactory jfrog.com
JFrog Artifactory 22%, JFrog Container Registry 3%
25%1552,90017238,697$371201
Amazon parent site
Amazon ECR 8%, Amazon Elastic Container Registry 3%
12%40151,000,0001,380,939
GitHub github.io
GitHub Packages 5%
5%1351,500,00031,4793,010
Harbor goharbor.io5%11174,000331,9183,420
Azure azure.com
Azure Container Registry 5%, Azure Artifacts 0%
5%90301,00047,904
Google Cloud google.cn
Google Artifact Registry 5%
5%102165,0007,596
Cloudsmith cloudsmith.com3%651,300253,190$98234
GitLab parent site
GitLab Package Registry 2%
2%4590,5004,844
Artifactory2%8,100575

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (harness.io, jfrog.com, sonatype.com, sourceforge.net). The first result for “artifact and container registries” is docs.cloud.google.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best artifact repository for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which container registry would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top artifact and container registries and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best artifact repository for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an artifact repository. What should we look at?”Negative“Which artifact and container registries should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Artifactory, Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
JFrog Container RegistryChanged
Four alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Harbor
no first choice
Three alternativesCloudsmith, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Nexus Repository OSS
Three alternativesApache Archiva, Artifactory Open Source, GitHub Packages
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
GPT-5.4 miniSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory
against: GitHub Packages
Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
One alternativeJFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Google Container RegistrySonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeJFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Container Registry
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Six alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, ECR, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesCNCF Harbor, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
against: Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
no first choice
Ten alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, AWS Container Registry, Azure Artifacts, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Six alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, AWS ECR, Azure Artifacts, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, Docker Registry API v1, Google Container Registry, Kubernetes Legacy Registry, Public GHCR, Public Quay.io
Perplexity SonarCloudsmith
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon ECRChanged
Five alternativesAzure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub
no first choice
Ten alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, Harbor
against: Cloudsmith
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
Grok 4.20JFrog Artifactory
Eight alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, GHCR, GitHub Packages, Harbor, ProGet, Sonatype Lifecycle
Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Harbor
against: Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository
Eight alternativesAWS, Cloudsmith, GCP Artifact Registry, GitHub Packages, GitLab Packages, Harbor, Reposilite, Verdaccio
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, Harbor
against: ACR, Amazon ECR Public, Artifactory, Docker Hub, ECR, GCR, GitHub Packages, GitLab public, Google Artifact Registry public buckets, Nexus, Quay.io, exposed Docker Registry v2
Mistral SmallJFrog Artifactory
Six alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog ArtifactoryHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitHub Packages
against: Sonatype Nexus Repository
Google Artifact Registry
Five alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Artifacts, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repositoryagainst: JFrog Artifactoryno first choiceagainst: Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
DeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon ECRChanged
Three alternativesGitHub Packages, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub, GitLab Package Registry
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Seven alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Artifacts, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Llama 4 MaverickJFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog ArtifactoryHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Harbor
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesCloudRepo, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: DockerHub, Quay.io, gcr.io, ghcr.io
Qwen 3.7 FlashJFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Lifecycle
no first choiceChanged
Seven alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
against: Harbor
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Four alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: AWS ECR
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycleagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry
Kimi K2Sonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesCloudsmith, GitHub Packages
against: JFrog Artifactory
Azure Container Registry, GitHub PackagesChangedagainst: AWS ECR, Google Artifact Registryno first choice
Eight alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Artifact Keeper
Three alternativesAzure Artifacts, GitHub Packages, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesCloudsmith, Harbor, JFrog Cloud, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: ACR, Azure Artifacts, ECR, GAR
against: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, PyPI, RubyGems, ghcr.io, npm Registry
GLM 4.7 FlashXSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesHarbor, JFrog Artifactory
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, HarborChanged
Two alternativesAzure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
against: GitLab Package Registry
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository
Five alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Harbor, Reposilite, Verdaccio
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudsmith
against: Docker Hub
MiniMax M2.5Sonatype Nexus Repository
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Harbor, JFrog Container RegistryChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, GitHub, GitLab Package Registry
no first choice
Ten alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Artifact Hub, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesCloudsmith, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, PyPI, RubyGems, npm
GPT-6 LunaCloudsmith
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon ECRChanged
Three alternativesArtifact Registry, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages
no first choice
Eight alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
Muse Glimmer 30BJFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesCloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon ECRChanged
Four alternativesAzure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Container RegistrySonatype Nexus Repository
Four alternativesArtifact Keeper, GitHub Packages, Nexspence, Reposilite
against: JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Quay.io
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:40no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:06yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:02no015 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:06yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:10yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:00yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:38yes2027 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:55yes54 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:41no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:41yes1922 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:46yes2253 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:39yes1034 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:04yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:45yes1424 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:39yes1610 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:05yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:22no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:53yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:00yes514 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:28yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:59yes2226 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:09yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:14yes528 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:23yes1537 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 19:42yes985 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:44yes520 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:45yes411 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:12yes1324 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:23yes910 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:33yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:09no020 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:44yes1010 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:49yes510 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:14yes108 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:35yes2555 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:17yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:10yes524 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:11yes1758 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:07yes1992 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:15yes1029 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:46yes823 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:23yes1422 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:44no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:57yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:26no015 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:30yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:58yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:18yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:51yes2120 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:33yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:00no026 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:37yes1766 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:15yes21317 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:17yes525 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:17yes310 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:59yes1324 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:43no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:00no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:58no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:47yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:58yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:23no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:21yes2138 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:47yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:01no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:46yes2384 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:02yes15124 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:13yes520 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:25yes318 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:36no01 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:47yes1811 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:29yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:01yes521 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:13yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:45yes57 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:05yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:13yes2532 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:35yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:41yes519 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:09yes2530 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:25yes2451 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:55yes2534 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:45yes610 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:05yes2533 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR) read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
Azure ACR read as Azure Container Registry
Azure Container Registry, ACR read as Azure Container Registry
GitHub Container Registry read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry, ghcr.io read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages & GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitLab Community Edition (Self-Hosted) read as GitLab Package Registry
GitLab Container Registry read as GitLab Package Registry
GitLab Package & Container Registry read as GitLab Package Registry
Google Cloud Artifact Registry read as Google Artifact Registry
JFrog Artifactory / JFrog Container Registry read as JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype Nexus Community Edition read as Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition read as Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS read as Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS (Open Source Edition) read as Sonatype Nexus Repository
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Container Registry (ECR)
Amazon ECR – AWS Elastic Container Registry
Apt-Cacher-NG
Artifactory Open Source
Athens
Devpi
Distribution
Docker Registry API v1
Docker Registry/Harbor
GitLab Pkg Reg
GitLab public
Gitea Packages
Google Artifact Registry public buckets
JFrog Cloud
Kubernetes Legacy Registry (`k8s.gcr.io`)
Nexspence
Public GHCR
Public Quay.io
Pulp
Red Hat Quay.io
Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager
exposed Docker Registry v2
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← App shieldingCI/CD →