JFrog Artifactory is a universal repository manager and artifact repository, listed among artifact and container registries · jfrog.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
GitHub Packages is first at 50%.
Sonatype Nexus Repository is first at 28%. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Sonatype Nexus Repository at 22%.
“the recommended container registry for a mid-sized B2B company would be JFrog Artifactory, as it is considered the best for enterprise artifact management”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
“If you are supporting a diverse product portfolio, JFrog Artifactory is usually worth the investment for the governance capabilities alone.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“JFrog Artifactory | Large enterprises needing broad format coverage + advanced security (Xray) | Complex pricing, consumption-based costs”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“JFrog Artifactory (or its cloud-managed version, JFrog Cloud) is generally the strongest choice for a mid-market B2B company”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Avoid JFrog for mid-market unless you specifically need its 60+ format support”Kimi K2 · Direct question · warning
“Expensive compared to native cloud registries; typically overkill unless you manage complex, multi-language library dependencies”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“JFrog Artifactory: starts at $20k/year for the on-prem Pro tier. Free tier ("OSS") is severely feature-limited.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Not a security risk, but widely reported as problematic for small teams and cost-sensitive projects.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as JFrog Artifactory, over the 180 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | 27 | Compare → | |
| 103 | 26 | Compare → | |
| 100 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 93 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 79 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 66 | 0 | View → | |
| 64 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 58 | 2 | View → | |
| 53 | 6 | View → | |
| 46 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of JFrog Artifactory →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on JFrog Artifactory's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 155 of the 180 answers that named JFrog Artifactory and are not a share of its labels.
357 of the 456 domain citations in answers naming JFrog Artifactory came from a third party's page. Forty-two were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 959 | 0 | 2021-04-07 | SIEM, SAST | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 210 | 0 | 2026-03-11 | IaC, SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 139 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | IaC, SAST | |
| News or press | 106 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 91 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 59 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 43 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 9 | 0 | 2021-02-09 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-05-05 |
As the event pages on jfrog.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page jfrog.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.