Dynamic application security testing
Asked as “DAST tool”, and as “dynamic web application security scanner”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · OWASP ZAP 26%
33Invicti26OWASP ZAP13Acunetix28others
33% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Invicti (33%) replaces OWASP ZAP (29% then, 26% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Invicti leads at 33%, replacing OWASP ZAP, which led at 29% and stands at 26% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
OWASP ZAP51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Invicti33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Invicti (33%) replaces OWASP ZAP (29% then, 26% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseInvicti58%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
OWASP ZAP51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketInvicti33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Invicti (33%) replaces OWASP ZAP (29% then, 26% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseInvicti58%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Invicti33%12%51endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 20% → 33%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 33%
Invicti33%12%51endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 20% → 33%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 33%02OWASP ZAP26%25%57accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 26%
OWASP ZAP26%25%57accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.29% → 26%03
Acunetix13%6%35accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 13%
Acunetix13%6%35accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 13%04
StackHawk11%2%41accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%
StackHawk11%2%41accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%05Bright Security2%0%11accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
06
Escape2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Escape2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Probely2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Probely2%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Veracode DAST2%24%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Veracode DAST2%24%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Burp Suite0%28%40criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12
Nuclei0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Nuclei0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%12%25accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%12%25accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Qualys Web Application Scanning0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qualys Web Application Scanning0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Detectify0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Detectify0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Invicti vs Bright SecurityInvicti vs EscapeInvicti vs ProbelyInvicti vs Veracode DASTOWASP ZAP vs AcunetixOWASP ZAP vs StackHawkOWASP ZAP vs Bright SecurityOWASP ZAP vs EscapeOWASP ZAP vs ProbelyOWASP ZAP vs Veracode DASTAcunetix vs StackHawkAcunetix vs Bright SecurityAcunetix vs EscapeAcunetix vs ProbelyAcunetix vs Veracode DASTStackHawk vs Bright SecurityStackHawk vs EscapeStackHawk vs ProbelyStackHawk vs Veracode DASTBright Security vs EscapeBright Security vs ProbelyBright Security vs Veracode DASTEscape vs ProbelyEscape vs Veracode DASTProbely vs Veracode DAST
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304B05
060708B09
10111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Invicti33%
Invicti33%02OWASP ZAP26%
OWASP ZAP26%03Acunetix13%
Acunetix13%04StackHawk11%
StackHawk11%05Bright Security2%
06Escape2%
Escape2%07Probely2%
Probely2%08Veracode DAST2%
Veracode DAST2%09Burp Suite0%
10Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%11Detectify0%
Detectify0%12Nuclei0%
Nuclei0%13Qualys Web Application Scanning0%
Qualys Web Application Scanning0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OWASP ZAP25%
14 of 57 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“it is advisable to avoid or proceed with extreme caution when using OWASP ZAP or Invicti in automated pipelines” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Burp Suite
28%
11 of 40 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid these if you are mid-market: Burp Suite Professional” Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt
Invicti12%
6 of 51 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“it is advisable to avoid or proceed with extreme caution when using OWASP ZAP or Invicti in automated pipelines” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Arachni
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Arachni: Avoid relying on the original project for current coverage. Its GitHub repository was archived on May 31, 2026” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 782 links across 196 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 51 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Safeguard30 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ImmuniWeb29 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
vendor site · GitHub18 answers · 39 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx18 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Invicti17 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Escape12 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · StackHawk12 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best dast tool”, “dast tool”, “dast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invicti invicti.com Invicti 33%, Netsparker 2% | 35% | 161 | 90,500 | 83 | 54,568 | $50 | 24 | |
| OWASP ZAP owasp.org | 26% | 194 | 3,600 | 122 | 365,222 | 1 | ||
| Acunetix acunetix.com | 13% | 92 | 880 | 43 | 15,291 | 10 | ||
| StackHawk stackhawk.com | 11% | 175 | 590 | 10 | 8,458 | 8 | 6 | |
| Bright Security | 2% | 170 | 9 | |||||
| Escape escape.tech | 2% | 31 | 90,500 | 261,733 | 2,252 | $190 | 2 | 5 |
| Probely probely.com | 2% | 27 | ||||||
| Intruder intruder.io | 2% | 291 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| Veracode veracode.com Veracode DAST 2% | 2% | 43 | 4,400 | 194 | 12,543 company | 17 | ||
| Bright | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, escape.tech, github.com, safeguard.sh, stackhawk.com). The first result for “best dast tool” is snyk.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best DAST tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dynamic web application security scanner would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top DAST tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best DAST tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a DAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which DAST tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5InvictiAcunetixChangedno first choiceOWASP ZAPno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Bright Security, StackHawkThree alternatives
Bright Security, Burp Suite DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSecFour alternatives
Burp Enterprise, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkThree alternatives
Nikto, Nuclei, WapitiGPT-5.4 miniStackHawkagainst: OWASP ZAPBurp Suite Enterprise Edition, InvictiChangedOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSecno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, StackHawk
Two alternatives
Burp Suite, InvictiThree alternatives
Detectify, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable Web App ScanningSix alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawk, Veracode DASTOne alternative
Burp SuiteGemini 3.5 FlashStackHawkagainst: HCL AppScan, OWASP ZAP, Veracode DASTInvicti, StackHawkChangedno first choiceOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, OpenText Fortify, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTno first choiceagainst: Arachni, Nikto, Nuclei, Skipfish, Vega, w3af
Four alternatives
Acunetix, Bright Security, Escape, InvictiTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, Rapid7 InsightAppSecFive alternatives
Burp Suite, Intruder, Nuclei, Probely, StackHawkPerplexity SonarInvictiagainst: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAPInvictiHeldBurp SuiteOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Nuclei, OWASP ZAP
Three alternatives
Bright Security, Escape, StackHawkFour alternatives
Burp Suite DAST, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawkFive alternatives
Checkmarx DAST, Escape, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkOne alternative
StackHawkGrok 4.20Invictiagainst: Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Checkmarx One, OWASP ZAP, Veracode DASTInvictiHeldagainst: Qualys Web Application ScanningInvictiOWASP ZAPagainst: Arachni, WapitiInvicti, Netsparkeragainst: Burp Suite, Invicti, Nikto, OWASP ZAP, SQLMap, ffuf
Four alternatives
Escape, Intruder, Probely, StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSecSeven alternatives
Bright Security, Burp Suite, Nuclei, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, StackHawk, Tenable Web App ScanningOne alternative
NucleiFive alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Probely, StackHawkMistral SmallAcunetix, InvictiInvictiChangedno first choiceOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Invicti, OWASP ZAP
Two alternatives
OWASP ZAP, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite Enterprise EditionDeepSeek V4 FlashAcunetixInvictiChangedno first choiceOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp SuiteInvictiagainst: Arachni, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, OWASP ZAP, OpenText Fortify WebInspect
Three alternatives
Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Bright Security, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkTen alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, Detectify, HCL AppScan, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Nikto, StackHawkFive alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawkLlama 4 MaverickInvictiVeracode DASTChangedEscapeOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: OWASP ZAP
Three alternatives
Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkThree alternatives
Black Duck DAST, DerScanner DAST, HostedScan DASTThree alternatives
Detectify, Invicti, PortSwigger Burp Suite EnterpriseQwen 3.7 FlashInvictiagainst: AppScan, Burp SuiteAcunetixChangedagainst: OWASP ZAPAcunetix, InvictiOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suiteno first choiceagainst: OWASP ZAP, SQLMap
Four alternatives
Acunetix, Apidog, Postman, Veracode DASTTwo alternatives
Invicti, SnykSix alternatives
Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, SOOS, StackHawkOne alternative
NucleiKimi K2Acunetix, Intruderagainst: SnykInvictiChangedInvictiOWASP ZAPBright, Escape, StackHawkagainst: Invicti, Veracode DASTagainst: Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Qualys DAST, Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Two alternatives
Bright Security, DetectifyTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, OWASP ZAPSix alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Detectify, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, StackHawkFive alternatives
Blacksight, Burp Suite, Dastardly, Nuclei, StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application ScanningGLM 4.7 FlashXOWASP ZAP, ProbelyInvictiChangedBurp SuiteOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suiteno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, Nikto, Nuclei, OWASP ZAP
Three alternatives
Burp Suite, Invicti, StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSecFour alternatives
Acunetix, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkThree alternatives
Astra Security Suite, Nuclei, StackHawkMiniMax M2.5Acunetix, Bright Securityagainst: InvictiInvictiChangedAcunetix, InvictiOWASP ZAPagainst: Checkmarx DASTno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Detectify, IntruderSeven alternatives
Burp Suite, Detectify, HCL AppScan, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, WapitiGPT-6 LunaStackHawkStackHawkHeldno first choiceOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Arachni, OWASP ZAP
Two alternatives
Burp Suite DAST, InvictiOne alternative
Burp Suite DASTMuse Glimmer 30BInvictiAcunetixChangedAcunetix, Invicti, formerly NetsparkerZed Attack Proxyagainst: Burp Suiteno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Burp Scanner, GitLab DAST proxy-based analyzer, Skipfish
Two alternatives
Acunetix, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Invicti, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
ImmuniWeb Neuron, OWASP ZAP, now ZAP by Checkmarx, PortSwigger Burp Suite EnterpriseTwo alternatives
Nuclei, StackHawkBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:05 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:00 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 88 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:14 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:30 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:37 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 45 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:59 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:41 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:56 | yes | 22 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:32 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:35 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:18 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 10 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 13 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:36 | no | 0 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:44 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 23 | 83 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 9 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:53 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
ImmuniWeb read as ImmuniWeb Neuron
Qualys read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Qualys WAS read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Qualys Web App Scanning read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Veracode read as Veracode DAST
Veracode Dynamic Analysis read as Veracode DAST
Unresolved, counted raw
AppCheck Ltd
Astra Security Suite
Black Duck DAST
Burp
Burp Enterprise
Burp Professional
Burp Scanner
Caido
DerScanner DAST
GitLab DAST proxy-based analyzer
Goohydra / Hyracks
HostedScan DAST
Invicti, formerly Netsparker
MisterScanner
OWASP ZAP, now ZAP by Checkmarx
Zed Attack Proxy
ZeroThreat
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.