November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › IT › Developer platform › Developer portals · November 2026 Edition

Internal developer portals

Asked as “internal developer portal”, and as “internal developer platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
57%
Clear leader
57Port12Backstage08Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud22others

57% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 58% → 57%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Port held the lead, −1 point on 58%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Port57%7%71endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 58% → 57%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.58% → 57%
02Backstage12%42%72criticized challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 23% → 12%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.23% → 12%
03Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud8%12%49accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%
04Roadie8%0%32accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%
05Atlassian Compass4%17%30accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
06OpsLevel2%7%42accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07Humanitec0%18%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08Cycloid0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

One product takes 57% of first choices here, so the chart would put seven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Backstage
42%
30 of 72 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“it is arguably the biggest trap for companies without a dedicated "Platform Team" of at least 3–5 senior engineers” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Atlassian Compass
17%
5 of 30 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“I would not start a new evaluation with Atlassian Compass as a standalone option.” GPT-6 Luna, scale prompt
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
12%
6 of 49 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Other Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Cortex, configure8, or Cycloid are excellent but are paid SaaS platforms” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Humanitec
18%
5 of 28 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Humanitec is better if your main problem is environment and infrastructure orchestration, not primarily the developer portal experience” GPT-5.4 mini, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 776 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 57 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · OpsLevel33 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Port33 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cycloid26 answers · 54 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cortex17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Backstage16 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · SourceForge16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Roadie15 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub14 answers · 26 citations · 6 models
publisher (Gane)13 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best internal developer portal”, “internal developer portal”, “internal developer portals”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Port port.io57%19390,500598,2887,729261
Backstage backstage.io12%197110,0007,0812,9292
Palo Alto Networks parent site
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud 8%
8%27340,5001,088
Roadie roadie.io8%94110,0006,8384165
Atlassian atlassian.com
Atlassian Compass 4%, Confluence 0%
4%200165,0006,6174,724,388 company$5,90661
OpsLevel opslevel.com2%11532002,20612
Configure82%200
GitBook gitbook.com2%736,60011310,1181
Notion notion.com2%128673,00015,6081,061,46652
Spotify's Backstage2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cortex.io, port.io, roadie.io). The first result for “best internal developer portal” is cortex.io.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best internal developer portal for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal developer platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top internal developer portals and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best internal developer portal for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an internal developer portal. What should we look at?”Negative“Which internal developer portals should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choicePortChanged
Three alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Qovery
no first choice
Three alternativesBackstage, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
GitBook, Notion
One alternativeBackstage
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniRoadie
Two alternativesPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
RoadieHeld
Two alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
against: Backstage, Humanitec
no first choice
Seven alternativesAtlassian Compass, Backstage, Cycloid, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie, WSO2 Developer Platform
Backstage
Four alternativesCompass, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
no first choiceagainst: Backstage
Gemini 3.5 FlashPort
Four alternativesAtlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Roadie
against: Backstage
PortHeld
Six alternativesDuploCloud, Humanitec, Mia Platform, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Qovery, Roadie
against: Spotify Backstage
Backstage
Five alternativesAtlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
Port
One alternativeAtlassian Compass
against: Spotify Backstage
Port
Four alternativesAtlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Roadie
against: Spotify Backstage
against: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, Datadog Service Catalog, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, ServiceNow Service Catalog
Perplexity SonarPort
Four alternativesAtlassian Compass, Backstage, Humanitec, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
PortHeld
Five alternativesBackstage, Cycloid, Humanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Backstage
Five alternativesAtlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
Atlassian Compass
Two alternativesBackstage, Port
no first choiceagainst: Backstage, Humanitec
Grok 4.20Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Three alternativesOpsLevel, Port, Roadie
against: Argonaut, Harness, Humanitec, Self-Hosted Backstage
Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudHeld
Three alternativesHumanitec, OpsLevel, Port
against: Backstage
Backstage, Port
Three alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Roadie
Backstage
Two alternativesAtlassian Compass, Port
against: Configure8, Cycloid, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
no first choice
Four alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
against: Backstage
Mistral SmallPortagainst: Backstage, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudBackstageChanged
Four alternativesHumanitec, Internal, Port, Railway
Port, Roadie
Three alternativesAtlassian Compass, Backstage, Cycloid
Port
One alternativeAtlassian Compass
against: Backstage
no first choiceagainst: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
DeepSeek V4 FlashPort
Two alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
against: Backstage
PortHeld
Two alternativesCycloid, Qovery
against: Backstage
Backstage
Six alternativesHarness IDP, Humanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
Port
One alternativeAtlassian Compass
against: Backstage
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Portagainst: Backstageagainst: Backstage, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickPort
Three alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
PortHeldPort
Three alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Atlassian Compass
One alternativePort
against: Backstage
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashPort
One alternativeHumanitec
against: Spotify Backstage
Configure8Changed
Two alternativesControl Plane, Microtica
against: Backstage
Spotify Backstage
Four alternativesHumanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
Backstage
Four alternativesConfluence, Docusaurus, GitBook, Port
Spotify's Backstage
Four alternativesCompass, Harness, Humanitec, Stackhero
against: AWS Control Tower, Astronomer Astro, Azure Landing Zones, Backstage, Docusaurus, Flyport, GCP’s internal tools, Hugo, Humanitec, Mintlify
Kimi K2Port
One alternativeOpsLevel
against: Backstage
PortHeld
Two alternativesConfigure8, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
against: Backstage
Backstage
Four alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
Port
One alternativeAtlassian Compass
against: Backstage
no first choice
Two alternativesPalo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
against: Backstage
against: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
GLM 4.7 FlashXPort
Four alternativesBackstage, Humanitec, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
RoadieChanged
Five alternativesBackstage, Cycloid, OpsLevel, Port, Red Hat Developer Hub
Port
Eleven alternativesAtlassian Compass, Backstage, Configure8, Cycloid, Humanitec, Mia‑Platform, Northflank, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Qovery, Roadie
Backstage
Four alternativesForgePortal, FrontStage, Port, Red Hat Developer Hub
no first choiceagainst: Atlassian Compass, Backstage, OpsLevel, Port
MiniMax M2.5OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Three alternativesBackstage, Harness IDP, Roadie
PortChanged
Two alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
against: Backstage
Backstage
Three alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
Port
Two alternativesAtlassian Compass, Cycloid
against: Backstage
no first choiceagainst: Backstage
GPT-6 LunaPort
Two alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel
PortHeld
Two alternativesBackstage, Humanitec
Backstage
Six alternativesOpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Red Hat Developer Hub, Roadie, Spotify Portal
against: Humanitec
Port
One alternativeBackstage
no first choice
Four alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port
against: Atlassian Compass
against: Backstage
Muse Glimmer 30BPort
Three alternativesBackstage, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Port, RoadieChanged
Five alternativesAtlassian Compass, Cycloid, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Red Hat Developer Hub
against: Backstage
Backstage
Five alternativesAtlassian Compass, OpsLevel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Port, Roadie
Backstage, Port
One alternativeRoadie
no first choiceagainst: Backstage
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:37no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:59yes15 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:31no016 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:47yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:52yes1416 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:45yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:19yes2230 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:39yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:04no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:13yes1525 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:52yes25100 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:23yes533 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 19:35yes312 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:06yes1317 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:15yes168 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:53yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:25no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:14yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:51yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:54no04 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:56yes2328 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:35yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:35yes529 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:08yes1523 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:40yes22116 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:37yes519 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:58yes317 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:26yes1322 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:48yes148 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:28yes210 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:38yes1023 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:50yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:32yes1417 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:55yes1513 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:59yes2331 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:35yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:35yes519 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:10yes1443 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:05yes10165 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:34yes2463 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:50yes828 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:14yes1422 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:21no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:02yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:48yes919 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:40yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:26yes58 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:38yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:09yes2420 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:43yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:46no028 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:07yes1753 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:24yes2248 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:38yes916 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:26yes211 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:45yes1319 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:03yes1011 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:07yes68 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:20no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:40yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:17yes513 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:33no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:44yes1644 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:28yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:07no033 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:02yes1542 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:13yes1479 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:08yes916 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:58yes425 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:58no03 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:37no03 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:43yes111 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:57yes1122 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:05yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:23yes511 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:18yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:37yes2435 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:27yes96 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:11no040 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:53yes2530 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:34yes1577 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:12yes1457 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:59yes210 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:42yes2532 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Port.io read as Port
Port.io (Port) read as Port
Spotify Portal for Backstage read as Spotify Portal
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Control Tower
Argonaut
Azure Landing Zones
Catalogue
Datadog Internal Developer Portal
Datadog Service Catalog
Flyport
ForgePortal
GCP’s internal tools
Gloo Portal
Hasura Console
Mendix Copilot
Mia‑Platform
Pulumi IDP
ServiceNow Service Catalog
Spotify's internal Portal
Stackhero
WSO2 API Content Hub
WSO2 Developer Platform
Zudoku
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Feature flagsSecure code training →