Bright Security
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
OWASP ZAP is first at 51%.
Invicti is first at 33%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Invicti is first at 58%.
Why models recommend it
“I'd recommend starting with Acunetix or Bright Security”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Use modern AI-assisted DAST tools (Bright Security, Invicti, Checkmarx DAST, Detectify) that support modern architectures”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“Bright Security is best for mid-market companies with API-first architectures seeking early SDLC security integration.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Bright Security targets mid-market API-first companies with AI validation and vulnerability remediation”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Bright Security, over the 25 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 10 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 10 | 2 | View → | |
| 10 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Bright Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 21 of the 25 answers that named Bright Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for Bright Security, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |