Index › HR › Products › SmartRecruiters › Alternatives · November 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to SmartRecruiters, as AI models named them

In the November 2026 Edition, 435 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where SmartRecruiters holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 435 answers that did not name SmartRecruiters, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Applicant tracking systems

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when SmartRecruiters is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessSmartRecruiters holds 2 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

Breezy HR31 of 84
100Hires13 of 84
Workable11 of 84
Zoho Recruit10 of 84
JazzHR8 of 84
BambooHR4 of 84
Manatal3 of 84
Recruitee2 of 84
4 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketSmartRecruiters is #13 of 17 here at 0% of first choices, 18 labels.

Eighty of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

Greenhouse23 of 80
Workable11 of 80
Breezy HR8 of 80
Lever7 of 80
Ashby4 of 80
100Hires2 of 80
Manatal2 of 80
6 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseSmartRecruiters is #4 of 10 here at 7% of first choices, 47 labels.

Fifty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those fifty-three answers, six products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

Recruitment marketing and career sites

Talent acquisition. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when SmartRecruiters is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessSmartRecruiters holds 7 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-two answers, twenty products in all, the eight most named:

Manatal16 of 82
Teamtailor14 of 82
Workable12 of 82
Zoho Recruit12 of 82
Breezy HR4 of 82
TalentLyft4 of 82
inploi3 of 82
100Hires2 of 82
12 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketSmartRecruiters is #13 of 17 here at 0% of first choices, 15 labels.

Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

Teamtailor20 of 74
Manatal6 of 74
Phenom6 of 74
Greenhouse4 of 74
Workable4 of 74
Gem3 of 74
Beamery2 of 74
7 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseSmartRecruiters is #5 of 15 here at 5% of first choices, 32 labels.

Sixty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name SmartRecruiters; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those sixty-two answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

Phenom26 of 62
Avature4 of 62
Greenhouse3 of 62
Beamery2 of 62
Bullhorn2 of 62
Radancy2 of 62
Ashby1 of 62
7 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled SmartRecruiters neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named SmartRecruiters only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from SmartRecruiters's side.

The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of SmartRecruiters was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.