ChartHop vs Miro
Nine of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Miro by thirteen and ChartHop carries 48 labels and Miro 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMiro
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ChartHop Miro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Miro on the right.The direct prompt
ChartHop first, Miro not the choice
9 of 14 modelsMiro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ChartHop28%#1 of 15Miro2%#8 of 15What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Miro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Lucidchart, Miro, Canva, or generic diagramming tools are great for visual design, but they don’t automatically pull or update from employee data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“org charts are possible, but Miro is more of a whiteboard/workshop tool than a dedicated org chart system” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Miro – ⚠️ Not Purpose-Built - Better for brainstorming than dedicated org charting” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lucidchart/Miro (for org charts + process maps)” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Testing found Miro is best for org chart maintenance with sync updates and automated recurring updates.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“Miro is a collaborative visual planning tool that has a shared infinite canvas and is free to use.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.