Gong is a revenue platform for B2B go-to-market teams, covering conversation intelligence and call recording, coaching, and related revenue workflows · gong.io ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Fireflies.ai is first at 41%.
Avoma is first at 29%. 4 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Weflow at 7%.
“The most powerful proprietary AI for conversation intelligence — if your primary need is analyzing calls for insights rather than structured training, Gong leads the pack.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Gong is one of the leading conversation intelligence platforms in the market, known for its robust capabilities in recording, transcribing, and analyzing sales calls.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Gong excels at analyzing actual sales calls and emails to provide actionable insights, making it ideal for teams with complex sales cycles and high deal values.”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose an AI Platform (Gong) if your reps know how to sell, but you are struggling to coach managers because you lack objective data”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“What to Avoid (Budget-Busters) | Gong | $1,200-$2,700+/user/year | Enterprise pricing, multi-year contracts required”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid standard enterprise vendors (Gong, Mindtickle, Seismic/Lessonly) unless you have at least 15–20+ reps”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Platforms Strongly Advised to Avoid or Be Very Cautious About: Gong”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid starting with Gong or Clari if your budget is tight.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Gong, over the 410 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 210 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 160 | 36 | Compare → | |
| 122 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 110 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 97 | 27 | Compare → | |
| 93 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 87 | 1 | View → | |
| 78 | 2 | View → | |
| 69 | 1 | View → | |
| 62 | 3 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Gong →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Gong's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 361 of the 410 answers that named Gong and are not a share of its labels.
704 of the 794 domain citations in answers naming Gong came from a third party's page. Ninety were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Grok 4.20 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 19 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 638 | 12 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 500 | 0 | 2023-10-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 173 | undated | |||
| News or press | 153 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 0 | 2018-08-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 98 | 9 | 2026-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 38 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-02-13 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2019-11-13 |
Every page gong.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.