Four of fourteen models named Gong first on the direct prompt; zero named Fireflies.ai. Both were named by all fourteen models and Gong carries 67 labels and Fireflies.ai 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Gong.io, Ramat Gan, Israel, founded 2015. Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Gong and Fireflies.ai were named in the same answer 110 times, of the 410 answers naming Gong and the 163 naming Fireflies.ai. In those answers Fireflies.ai took the first choice twenty-eight times and Gong twenty-six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“What to Avoid (Budget-Busters) | Gong | $1,200-$2,700+/user/year | Enterprise pricing, multi-year contracts required” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid starting with Gong or Clari if your budget is tight.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gong is one of the leading conversation intelligence platforms in the market, known for its robust capabilities in recording, transcribing, and analyzing sales calls.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“*Cruz v. Fireflies.AI*, Case No. 3:25-cv-03399 C.D. Ill. alleges the Fireflies.AI's meeting assistant recorded, analyzed, transcribed and stored participants' voice” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“class-action lawsuits (*Cruz v. Fireflies.AI Corp.*) were filed alleging the company collected biometric data (voiceprints) without proper consent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fireflies.ai - due to alleged biometric privacy violations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best conversation intelligence and call recording platform for a company with a limited budget is Fireflies.ai, Avoma, or Sybill.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“prioritize platforms with zero data retention and no AI training by default (like Fireflies or self-hosted solutions)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Fireflies.ai – cheapest all-round phone / video CI ... It is the most cited low-cost conversation intelligence alternative” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.