Avoma vs Gong
Seven of fourteen models named Avoma first on the direct prompt; four named Gong. Both were named by all fourteen models and Avoma carries 58 labels and Gong 67, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
By Gong.io, Ramat Gan, Israel, founded 2015. Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.
By framing
AvomaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGong
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Avoma and Gong were named in the same answer 160 times, of the 280 answers naming Avoma and the 410 naming Gong. In those answers Gong took the first choice forty-seven times and Avoma thirty-six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Avoma Gong first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Avoma on the left and Gong on the right.The direct prompt
Avoma first, Gong an alternative
7 of 14 modelsGong was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gong first, Avoma an alternative
4 of 14 modelsAvoma was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Gong72%#1 of 15Avoma2%#4 of 15What the models said about Avoma
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“the consensus right now is Avoma as the best price-to-feature fit for call recording + conversation intelligence” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the recommended call recording and conversation intelligence tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Avoma” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best conversation intelligence and call recording platform for a mid-market B2B company is Avoma” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Gong
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“What to Avoid (Budget-Busters) | Gong | $1,200-$2,700+/user/year | Enterprise pricing, multi-year contracts required” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid starting with Gong or Clari if your budget is tight.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gong is one of the leading conversation intelligence platforms in the market, known for its robust capabilities in recording, transcribing, and analyzing sales calls.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.