Index › Finance › Receivables and billing › Ecommerce fraud › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Ecommerce fraud prevention for small business buyers

Asked as “ecommerce fraud prevention platform”, and as “online payment fraud detection tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · NoFraud 14%
34Stripe Radar14NoFraud12Signifyd40others

34% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Stripe Radar (34%) replaces NoFraud (34% then, 14% now), 20 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Stripe Radar leads at 34%, replacing NoFraud, which led at 34% and stands at 14% now: 20 points clear, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Stripe Radar34%0%56endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 20% → 34%, +14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.20% → 34%
02NoFraud14%15%41accepted challenger▼−20Since October 2026: 34% → 14%, −20 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.34% → 14%
03Signifyd12%35%54criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%
04SEON9%11%46accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 9%
05ClearSale9%12%33accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.5% → 9%
06FraudLabs Pro3%9%11accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 10% → 3%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 3%
07Chargeflow2%14%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Fingerprint2%12%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Shopify Protect2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
10Riskified2%65%26criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Forter0%72%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Kount0%67%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Sift0%41%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
11Wyllo0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
C05
06
07
08
09
10
W11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Stripe Radar34%
02NoFraud14%
03Signifyd12%
04SEON9%
05ClearSale9%
06FraudLabs Pro3%
07Chargeflow2%
08Fingerprint2%
09Shopify Protect2%
10Riskified2%
11Wyllo0%
12Sift0%
13Kount0%
14Forter0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Signifyd
35%
19 of 54 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid or be very cautious about: Enterprise-focused platforms (Signifyd, Riskified, Forter)” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Riskified
65%
17 of 26 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Riskified reviewers noting "unclear value for small companies" and false positives causing financial losses” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Sift
41%
13 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise tools like Signifyd, Riskified, Sift, or Kount” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Forter
72%
13 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused platforms (Kount, Forter, Accertify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, scale prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 831 links across 191 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · G249 answers · 87 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Stripe36 answers · 55 citations · 11 models
vendor site · cside29 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Fraudio25 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Whop16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 20 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Visa13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ecommerce fraud prevention platform”, “ecommerce fraud prevention platform”, “ecommerce fraud prevention platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Stripe parent site
Stripe Radar 34%
34%109823,000102,741
NoFraud nofraud.com14%681,300322270
Signifyd signifyd.com12%1953,6006210,180$5,17937
SEON seon.io9%1242,9001,70924,522712
ClearSale9%4804
FraudLabs Pro fraudlabspro.com3%1814008,4657
Chargeflow chargeflow.io2%1711,6001420,684$1,152107
Fingerprint fingerprint.com2%4960,50061,27532,146122
Shopify shopify.com
Shopify Protect 2%, Shopify Fraud Analysis 0%
2%111,000,00038,0673,486,997 company$3,351110
Trustmi trustmi.ai2%1539041,37111

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 27 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fraudio.com, stripe.com). The first result for “best ecommerce fraud prevention platform” is sift.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which online payment fraud detection tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top ecommerce fraud prevention platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an ecommerce fraud prevention platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ecommerce fraud prevention platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5FraudNet
One alternativeSEON
against: NoFraud
Eftsure, Trustmi, TrustpairChanged
One alternativePaySentinel
NoFraud, SEON
Three alternativesFingerprint, Riskified, Stripe Radar
NoFraud
Three alternativesFingerprint, FraudLabs Pro, SEON
no first choiceagainst: Arkose, ClearSale, Kount, NoFraud, SEON, Sardine, Signifyd
GPT-5.4 miniSignifyd
Three alternativesClearSale, Riskified, Sift
against: Chargeflow
Stripe RadarChanged
Two alternativesChargeflow, Sift
Riskified, Signifyd
Six alternativesChargeflow, Fingerprint, NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Wyllo
Fingerprint, SEON
Two alternativesChargeflow, NoFraud/Wyllo
no first choiceagainst: ClearSale, Kount, Riskified, Sift, Signifyd
Gemini 3.5 FlashClearSale, Signifyd
Four alternativesNoFraud, SEON, TreviPay, Two
Stripe RadarChanged
Four alternativesMiddesk, Plaid, Resolve, SEON
against: Kount, Sift
NoFraud, Signifyd
Three alternativesClearSale, FraudLabs Pro, SEON
Stripe Radar
Five alternativesFraudLabs Pro, MaxMind minFraud, NoFraud, Shopify Fraud Filter, Shopify Protect
NoFraud, Riskified, Signifyd
Four alternativesSEON, Shopify Protect, Sift, Stripe Radar
against: Bolt, ClearSale, Kount, LexisNexis ThreatMetrix, NoFraud, Riskified, Sift, Signifyd
Perplexity SonarNoFraud
Two alternativesSEON, Stripe Radar
against: Signifyd
Stripe RadarChanged
One alternativeSEON
against: Forter, Riskified, Sift
NoFraud/Wyllo, Stripe Radar
Five alternativesClearSale, Fingerprint, SEON, Sift, Signifyd
NoFraud—now branded Wyllo
Two alternativesFraudLabs Pro, Stripe Radar
against: SEON
no first choiceagainst: Kount, Riskified, Shield, Sift, cside
Grok 4.20ClearSale, NoFraud
Two alternativesSEON, Signifyd
against: Sift
Stripe RadarChanged
One alternativePayPal Fraud Protection
against: Sift, Signifyd
Fingerprint, SEON
Three alternativesArkOwl, Chargeflow, Sift
against: Forter, Kount, Riskified, Signifyd
Stripe Radar
Two alternativesIPQualityScore, NoFraud
against: Kount, Riskified, Sift, Signifyd
no first choice
Five alternativesNoFraud, Riskified, Shield, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
against: Basic built-in fraud filters, Forter, Kount, NoFraud, OrderProtection.com, Riskified
Mistral SmallClearSale, Stripe Radar
Three alternativesNoFraud, SEON, Signifyd
Stripe RadarChanged
One alternativeSEON
no first choice
Eight alternativesChargeflow, ClearSale, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, NoFraud, SEON, Signifyd, Stripe Radar, Wyllo
FraudLabs Pro, NoFraud
Two alternativesFingerprint, Stripe Radar
no first choiceagainst: Fingerprint, RefundCat, SEON, Sift, Signifyd
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON
Three alternativesNoFraud, PayPal's built-in risk tools, Stripe Radar
against: Signifyd
SEONHeld
Five alternativesFraudio, Signifyd, Stripe Radar, Trustmi, Trustpair
against: Forter, Riskified, Sift
Stripe Radar
Five alternativesClearSale, SEON, Shopify Protect, Signifyd, Wyllo
Stripe Radar
One alternativeNoFraud
Adyen's risk management, Stripe Radar
Five alternativesClearSale, NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Signifyd
against: Accertify, Forter, Kount, Riskified
against: Equifax, Forter, Kount, LexisNexis ThreatMetrix, NoFraud, Riskified, Signifyd, Wyllo
Llama 4 MaverickClearSale
Three alternativesChargeflow, NoFraud, SEON
no first choiceChangedno first choiceNoFraudno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSignifyd
Three alternativesOrderID, SEON, Stripe Radar
Stripe RadarChanged
Three alternativesNoFraud, PayPal Business Protection, Signifyd
NoFraud, Stripe Radar
Five alternativesCloudflare, FingerprintJS, Riskified, SEON, Signifyd
Chargeflow
Four alternativesFingerprint, SEON, Shopify Fraud Analysis, Stripe Radar
no first choice
Six alternativesCera, Cleva, PayPal Protection, Reconciliation.com, Shopify Protect, Stripe Radar
against: Forter, Signifyd, ThreatMetrix
against: Forter, MaxMind, Payoneer, Riskified, SEON, Signifyd
Kimi K2NoFraud, SEON
Three alternativesChargeflow, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
Stripe RadarChanged
Two alternativesSift, Trustmi
Stripe Radar
Two alternativesClearSale, SEON
against: Sift, Signifyd
NoFraud
One alternativeChargeflow
against: ClearSale, Forter, Riskified, Signifyd
no first choice
Five alternativesClearSale, NoFraud, PayPal Fraud Protection, Shopify Fraud Filter, Stripe Radar
against: Forter, Riskified
against: Fingerprint, Forter, Riskified, Signifyd
GLM 4.7 FlashXSignifyd
Four alternativesClearSale, NoFraud, SEON, Stripe Radar
PayPal Business Risk Management, Stripe RadarChanged
Two alternativesFraudNet, Trustpair
Stripe Radar
Five alternativesClearSale, NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Signifyd
Stripe Radar
Four alternativesChargeflow, NoFraud, SEON, Shopify Protect
no first choiceagainst: Authorize.net Advanced Fraud Detection Suite, Chargeflow, FraudLabs Pro, NoFraud, Riskified, Shopify Fraud Filter, Sift, Signifyd
MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, Signifyd
One alternativeSEON
Stripe RadarChanged
Three alternativesClearSale, Signifyd, Trustmi
NoFraud, Signifyd
Four alternativesClearSale, IPQualityScore, SEON, Stripe Radar
Signifyd
Four alternativesChargeflow, ClearSale, NoFraud, SEON
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaStripe Radar
Two alternativesNoFraud, Signifyd
Stripe RadarHeld
Two alternativesAuthorize.net, PayPal Fraud Protection
Stripe Radar
Four alternativesClearSale, Shopify Fraud Analysis, Signifyd, Wyllo
Shopify Protect, Stripe Radarno first choiceagainst: Forter, Riskified, Signifyd
Muse Glimmer 30BSEON
Four alternativesChargeflow, ClearSale, NoFraud, Stripe Radar
Stripe RadarChanged
One alternativeCybersource Fraud Management Essentials
Wyllo
Four alternativesChargeflow, Fingerprint, SEON, Stripe Radar
against: Riskified, Signifyd
FraudLabs Pro, Stripe Radar
Two alternativesChargeflow Insights, NoFraud
no first choiceagainst: Chargeflow, Forter, SEON, Sift, Signifyd
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:50yes168 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:50yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:36yes923 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:08yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:18yes935 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:51yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:55yes2129 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:50yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:29no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:41yes1556 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:54yes2537 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:31yes536 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:06yes315 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:38yes1222 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:04yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:28yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:36yes320 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:40yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes1427 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:02yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:50yes2421 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:59yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:00no028 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:39yes1010 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:05yes2366 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:45yes1031 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:25yes312 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:18yes1519 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:33yes1610 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:53yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:48yes1225 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:51yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes1437 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:27yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:13yes2232 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:46yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:18yes537 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:04yes1567 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:49yes1961 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:28yes2047 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:31yes520 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:16yes2238 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:19yes159 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:12yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:16yes717 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:16yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:19yes2035 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:58yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:01yes2322 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:04yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:56yes527 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:54yes1030 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:02yes2427 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:48yes1026 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:40yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:28yes1423 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:59no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:12no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:38no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:53yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:30yes533 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:10no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:20yes2231 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:30yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:45no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:20no073 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:20yes2035 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:17no031 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:02yes521 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:25yes1319 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:19yes1711 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:39yes26 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:02no019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:44yes94 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes1528 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:11yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:38yes2433 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:51yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:20no036 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:15yes2432 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:42yes23157 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:38no014 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:29yes418 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:46yes2427 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bureau read as Bureau ID
PayPal read as PayPal Fraud Protection
Shopify read as Shopify Fraud Analysis
Stripe read as Stripe Radar
Unresolved, counted raw
Adyen's risk management
Approov
ArkOwl
Arkose
Authorize.net Advanced Fraud Detection Suite (AFDS)
Basic built-in fraud filters (e.g., on Shopify, BigCommerce, or similar platforms)
Cera
Chargeflow Insights
Cleva (formerly Sift)
Cloudflare
Cybersource Fraud Management Essentials
FingerprintJS
Google reCAPTCHA
Mamo Business
Mastercard Identity 360
NoFraud—now branded Wyllo
OrderID
OrderProtection.com
PayPal Business Protection
PayPal Business Risk Management
PayPal Fraud Management
PayPal Merchant Services
PayPal Protection
PayPal fraud tools
PayPal's built-in risk tools
PayPal's protections
PayPal's seller protection
PaySentinel
Reconciliation.com
RefundCat
RevenueProtect
ShieldLabs
Shopify Fraud Protect
Shopify's built-in fraud detection
Shopify's built-in tools
Shopify's fraud filters
Square Fraud Detection
Square Virtual Terminal
The KYB
Visa Protect
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Chargeback managementEmbedded payments →