Index › Finance › Receivables and billing › Ecommerce fraud › SEON vs Fingerprint
Ecommerce fraud prevention · November 2026 Edition

SEON vs Fingerprint

Three of fourteen models named SEON first on the direct prompt; zero named Fingerprint. SEON was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fingerprint by twelve and SEON carries 43 labels and Fingerprint 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

SEON

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Fingerprint

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4321A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SEON reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Signifyd was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Stripe Radar vs SEON · Stripe Radar vs Fingerprint · Signifyd vs SEON

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SEONFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFingerprint
Direct30
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained122 against SEON
Scale-constrained00
Negative201 against SEON · 3 against Fingerprint
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SEON and Fingerprint were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 136 answers naming SEON and the 50 naming Fingerprint. In those answers Fingerprint took the first choice one time and SEON three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SEON and Fingerprint stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
SEON Fingerprint first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SEON on the left and Fingerprint on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SEON and Fingerprint stood in it.

SEON first, Fingerprint not the choice

3 of 14 modelsFingerprint was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20SEON alternatives: ClearSale, Sift, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON alternatives: Sift, Signifyd
MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, SEON, Sift alternatives: Kount

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trustpair alternatives: Riskified, SEON, Signifyd
Gemini 3.5 FlashSift alternatives: Kount, SEON, Trustmi AI
Perplexity SonarSignifyd alternatives: ClearSale, SEON, Sift
Kimi K2Signifyd alternatives: SEON, Sift, Wyllo
GLM 4.7 FlashXStripe Radar alternatives: SEON, Signifyd
Muse Glimmer 30BClearSale alternatives: SEON, Sift, Signifyd, Trustpair

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSift alternatives: Forter, Riskified, Signifyd
Mistral SmallClearSale, Signifyd alternatives: Stripe Radar, Sumsub
Llama 4 MaverickSignifyd
Qwen 3.7 FlashSift alternatives: LexisNexis Intelligent Investigator, Ping Identity, Signifyd, Wyllo
GPT-6 LunaSignifyd alternatives: Kount, Sift, Trustmi

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SEON leads by seven points.
SEON9%#4 of 14
Fingerprint2%#8 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
SEON leads by seven points.
SEON11%#3 of 11
Fingerprint4%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
SEON leads by six points.
SEON6%#5 of 15
Fingerprint0%#14 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about SEON

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“Reported pricing starts around $699/month, so it may be less suitable for very small merchants.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if the vendor cannot explain what data it uses, how long it retains it” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“SEON publishes self-serve pricing at $699/month for the Starter tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“SMBs on a tight budget should compare SEON, FraudLabs Pro, and Sift... SEON's free tier can help you get started without immediate investment.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Reviews suggest this platform is user-friendly and offers better visibility into how fraud signals are calculated” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“For a mid-market B2B company, SEON is the strongest overall choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fingerprint

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Fingerprint, for instance, has noted complaints about being "too high" for the value.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fingerprinting or risk scoring alone does not validate a purchase.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pricing and accuracy are the most cited cons in aggregate reviews.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fingerprint offers a free tier up to 1,000 API calls/month... one of the best options for businesses that need to recognize returning users” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For very limited budgets, start with Fingerprint's free tier” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“provides a free tier with 1,000 web API calls per month, which is useful for basic fraud detection needs” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.