Three of fourteen models named SEON first on the direct prompt; zero named Forter. Both were named by all fourteen models and SEON carries 43 labels and Forter 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SEON and Forter were named in the same answer fifty-three times, of the 136 answers naming SEON and the 99 naming Forter. In those answers Forter took the first choice three times and SEON nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Reported pricing starts around $699/month, so it may be less suitable for very small merchants.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if the vendor cannot explain what data it uses, how long it retains it” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“SEON publishes self-serve pricing at $699/month for the Starter tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“SMBs on a tight budget should compare SEON, FraudLabs Pro, and Sift... SEON's free tier can help you get started without immediate investment.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Reviews suggest this platform is user-friendly and offers better visibility into how fraud signals are calculated” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“For a mid-market B2B company, SEON is the strongest overall choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Riskified, Forter, and Kount” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Premium pricing: Listed at $120K/year on AWS Marketplace for under 1M decisions—significantly more expensive than competitors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“if you need enterprise-grade protection with chargeback guarantees (though they're primarily enterprise-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tier 1 (Enterprise/High Touch): Forter, Signifyd. (High cost, full liability guarantee, heavy focus on human-in-the-loop workflows).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Riskified or Forter for high-volume retail, international sales, and aggressive false-decline reduction.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is widely considered the industry standard for high-volume transactions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.